Moon Landing

[InRareForm]

http://gizmodo.com/5977205/why-the-m...finitive-proof

[redzero]

This was an interesting video. I never thought of it from that perspective.

It still doesn't mean anything, because conspiracy theorists believe in these ridiculous conspiracies because they want to believe. No amount of facts will dissuade them.

[TDMVPDPOY]

so how come they didnt make a return trip after all these years

dont blame finance constraints when they have spent more money sending probes and building the ISS

dont the limitation of astronauts, when armstrong and his crew is no different to todays crews...

has improved, yet they dont return?

[redzero]

so how come they didnt make a return trip after all these years

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_12
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_14
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_15
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_17

dont blame finance constraints when they have spent more money sending probes and building the ISS

I don't have to do that, since you are wrong.

dont the limitation of astronauts, when armstrong and his crew is no different to todays crews...

See above.

has improved, yet they dont return?

You're a semi-literate dumbass.

[SA210]

so how come they didnt make a return trip after all these years

dont blame finance constraints when they have spent more money sending probes and building the ISS

dont the limitation of astronauts, when armstrong and his crew is no different to todays crews...

has improved, yet they dont return?

[Juggity]

so how come they didnt make a return trip after all these years

They did make a return trip to the moon. 5 times.

Apollo 12

Apollo 14

Apollo 15

Apollo 16

Apollo 17

Edit: redzero beat me

[Agloco]

"...the light source was too far away for the inverse square law to have an effect...."

Legit

[mouse]

They did make a return trip to the moon. 5 times.

Apollo 12

Apollo 14

Apollo 15

Apollo 16

Apollo 17

I think the OP meant "The actual Moon" not the movie set of the 1960s

[redzero]

I think the OP meant "The actual Moon" not the movie set of the 1960s

Of course, you didn't watch the video.

Conspiracy theorists don't let facts get in the way.

[Wild Cobra]

I think the OP meant "The actual Moon" not the movie set of the 1960s

Wow...

You still believe that conspiracy , after all the facts you have been presented with?

Think about it. They did not have the capability to fake all those photos and video.

[Wild Cobra]

This was an interesting video. I never thought of it from that perspective.

It still doesn't mean anything, because conspiracy theorists believe in these ridiculous conspiracies because they want to believe. No amount of facts will dissuade them.

I've mentioned several times in the conspiracy threads that they wouldn't have been able to fake it.