Reply With Quote
So it's the 1st amendment that isn't that important.
TSA starts a thread and gets roasted.
So it's the 1st amendment that isn't that important.
17yrs ago those guns that were cash in were usually guns own during the federation years,
u dont see ppl handing in glocks/handguns and semis thats is smuggled into the country...
the only ppl now that use/own guns to be menace of society are mainly bikies, crime families and crims...the avg joe that have nothing to do with crime dont own guns...
most of the ppl killed by guns down here are mainly crims shooting each other, u rarely hear collateral innocent by standers gettin killed by guns
down here ppl getting killed in vehicle accidents > killing by guns..
If the example doesn't apply, why are threads being started about it?
Because the fuzzy lumpkins of the world think Australia=USA, and that we should model our society after them.
How people feel about it shouldn't change crime statistics or certain ban outcomes (and by this I don't mean to validate or otherwise what fuzzy posted, I really haven't kept up).
more guns = more gun crime, more gun deaths. non-gun crime and non-gun deaths are of no interest.
heard my first gunshots on the street yesterday - it was in a house place and late at night. 20 years before I heard shots on the street
i actually agree with this to be honest, and there should be a rule that they can only talk about it for one day so that everybody can get the memo and move on.
no, they're very much of interest you stupid head. go get beat with a metal bat and raped got.
Seems like you need to hit the gun range and let off some steam brah.
Which NRA talking point are you parroting? Take away gun death, injuries, and gun crime, and America becomes almost as civilized as ADULT advanced countries for non-gun death, injuries, crime.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 01-21-2013 at 09:44 AM.
They are all important Chump. My point is that their free speech is not being impinged because "reporting" is not individual speech and that reporting can be limited and controlled.
You apparently had no problem with "Seal Team Six" (a generic term) killing OBL without demanding the name of the individual Seal responsible for double tapping OBL.
The First Amendment only applies to the govt preventing freedom of speech and assembly.
Everybody non-govt can block free speech and assembly, and do all the time.
Really? Where's the court ruling that says that?
Which news outlet had that information? There is a difference between the federal government's classifying its own information and censoring every person in the United States, which is what would have to happen for your little scheme to be effective.You apparently had no problem with "Seal Team Six" (a generic term) killing OBL without demanding the name of the individual Seal responsible for double tapping OBL.
Reporting isn't individual speech, but it falls under freedom of the press.
"my little scheme"
GFY
It would work better than banning assault rifles. Possession of an assault rifle in Connecticut was already a felony.
It wouldn't work at all, given this little thing called "the internet."
Perhaps you have heard of it.
LOL @ Chump thinking he is the final word on what will and won't work.
I don't think mine is the final word any more than yours.
I certainly see flaws in your scheme, practical as well as cons utional, that would likely consign it to failure. I imagine you've struck upon those by yourself, so trying to change the subject to me again is a logical tactic.
Since you are automatically conditioned to nit pick and argue with anything I propose you wouldn't be able to see that it would have a better chance of being effective than trying to ban guns.
Is your word now the final word?
I think the difference in degree of failure between each scheme is negligible.
Just my opinion. You haven't really posted anything to persuade me to think differently.
So Chump...why do you think these losers do the mass shootings? What does Chump think they are trying to gain?
Why are we setting up a straw argument here?
We're talking about implementation.
Why are you running from a direct question like a little ?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
