This is how much of a fake you are. You know my stance on vaccines, FDA, pharmaceutical drugs, the wars, GMO's, Obama, Bush, 9/11, and you somehow want to "pretend" that I'm afraid to tell you what I have already said in other threads about Sandy Hook?! You know damn well I don't giva F**** lol
what a moron
you keep trying to make this about me, when this is entirely about you dodging a very simple question.
No amount of you're this or that is going to change the fact that you're a hypocrite that hides behind dead children for political reasons and don't want to answer a very, very simple question...
lol still dodging
lol trying to deflect making it personal and STILL dodging
lol measures of outrage
lol Still lying and dodging the fact that my original question was dodged
No amount of you're this or that is going to change the fact that you're a hypocrite that hides behind dead children for political reasons and don't want to answer a very, very simple question...
lol still dodging
lol trying to deflect making it personal and STILL dodging
lol measures of outrage
The hypocrisy echo chamber knows no bounds... next up you're going to put me on ignore and then run back to hide behind dead children you don't give a about unless it furthers your political agenda...
lol Don't get it twisted, the ignore is used to ignore trolls, anyone spinning that into anything else is simply just a lie. There have been a few in here who can't debate anything, they simply just spin and personally attack. I just decided recently to attack back and you just can't take it lol so you have to lie. I have no time for trolls, and yup ur heading in that direction. You have nowhere really ever debated me, from the get go you have only trolled my topics or messages and have added nothing at all. So a troll is a troll whether you admit it or not.
The hypocrisy echo chamber knows no bounds... next up you're going to put me on ignore and then run back to hide behind dead children you don't give a about unless it furthers your political agenda...
And no he didn't answer. He told me about a "private" grieving. My question is clearly about what he talks about here online. Somehow he and many others are outraged on here about 20 kids, but aren't outspoken about other countries children that Obama murders. You trying to spin that and troll away an entire topic with silly wannabe "gotcha" questions message after message is simply just trolling, childish and it shows your defeatIf you don't wanna troll anymore you have earned a day off the list. lol
Why must I be publicly scornful of drone attacks that kill children on an internet message board for me to actually be scornful of drone attacks that kill children in foreign countries?
Is the only acceptable way for me to actually grieve the loss of innocent lives in those places -- whether by drone attack or any other means of warfare -- to post bombast on SpursTalk?
For whatever it's worth, your assumption that my lack of posts on an internet message board somehow marks the totality of my views on that subject (or any other subject, for that matter) is remarkably self-serving given your choice (for whatever reason) to deride me for no apparent reason.
But don't let any of that deter you. You're certainly en led to think of me whatever you wish. If you think your view of me and my character is justified based on whatever fraction of my worldview you can actually glean from what I post here (cue SA210's silly joke about my post count), all the better.
For my part, I wouldn't ever suppose that I could read all of your posts and discover everything that you truly think and believe on any subject. Who has the time to express the universe of his or her views on an internet message board? Certainly not me. (cue SA210's silly joke questioning either my professional credentials or my current employment status).
My point in this thread was to question the silliness of a conspiracy theory about the Sandy Hook shootings. Hence my original question.
You've chosen to simply assume you know what I think and believe on other subjects and to use your assumptions to conclude that my disagreement with a conspiracy theory makes me a hypocrite. I'm not sure truly how one follows the other, but you've clearly made a connection and it suits your purposes here. I know my heart -- far better than you know my heart, I suspect. I can tell you that you're wrong, but I'm not sure that it would make any difference to you. So, if it makes you feel somehow better to anonymously ridicule people and to question their sentiments without even the slightest clue about them, well who am I to stop you?
Enjoy the rest of your morning, SA210.
lol Don't get it twisted, the ignore is used to ignore trolls, anyone spinning that into anything else is simply just a lie. There have been a few in here who can't debate anything, they simply just spin and personally attack. I just decided recently to attack back and you just can't take it lol so you have to lie. I have no time for trolls, and yup ur heading in that direction. You have nowhere really ever debated me, from the get go you have only trolled my topics or messages and have added nothing at all. So a troll is a troll whether you admit it or not.
And no he didn't answer. He told me about a "private" grieving. My question is clearly about what he talks about here online. Somehow he and many others are outraged on here about 20 kids, but aren't outspoken about other countries children that Obama murders. You trying to spin that and troll away an entire topic with silly wannabe "gotcha" questions message after message is simply just trolling, childish and it shows your defeat
Your ideas of how other people should grieve, express themselves or disagree with you are entirely constructions within your head. Things like 'measures of outrage' are exactly the type of stupid, unquantifiable metrics that a hypocrite like you comes up with when you're getting your ass handed to you (which happens quite often these days).
What's even funnier is the fake outrage you display when Barry (who's a piece of ) parades kids around politicizing dead children, then you turn around and use the same dead children for the exact same political purpose (which makes you the exact same piece of ).
Your avoidance again of answering a very simple question, going on personal tirades, self-proclaiming internet e-victories, etc only because it doesn't advance your political views is just another sad chapter in your continuous string of hypocrisy.
The ignore list is yours to use, you can do whatever you want with it, it just goes to show that you're not interested in debate at all, you want it your way or the highway. The fact that it includes very reasonable posters like LNGRrr really says a lot more about you than it says about anybody else.
Of course, now you're gonna go in another rant about sheep, the 'truth', lies... All irrelevant and simple euphemisms behind the sad reality: you're a hypocrite that uses dead ing children to further your political agenda. And you'll continue to do so, because they're the tool that are useful to you. You don't care about children, you care about advancing the message that brings the political leaders of your choosing to power. And you use dead children to do so. You're as much of a de able person as the ones you accuse and as far as I'm concerned I'm going to keep,laughing my ass off as the political assholes you pick to support get their asses handed to them. Not because of them, but because of you.
Why not? You clearly are about Sandy Hooks kids on message boards. Is it because you voted Obama?
Of course not. Why do you feel the need to exaggerate with "bombast"? All I said was equal.
You seem to jump on the bandwagon and talk some smack about me from time to time with the others in other topics, what's the difference, at least I actually have a point.
Right, Which is why I never said I knew everything about you. I only called you out specifically about the 20 kids Obama has used as pawns for political agenda and your silence on the political forum on his murder of 11 times more children than those kids he used as pawns. But nice extreme there, again.
Fair enough, I understand this, but I still brought up a valid point. Maybe an even better point would be that it's pretty silly of you to act like it is so silly for one to believe that the government would ever try such a conspiracy. If you want to keep thinking silly like that, then look up Operation Northwoods, completely and then tell me about our trustworthy government that would never do, attempt, or ever plan such a thing.My point in this thread was to question the silliness of a conspiracy theory about the Sandy Hook shootings. Hence my original question.
I already explained the connection I made, see above. You have had your share in ridiculing me, that is for sure so that in itself makes you a hypocrite, especially now with you playing the victim card. Can't take the heat, then don't start it. Again, read Operation Northwoods before you act so appalled about "Conspiracy Theories".You've chosen to simply assume you know what I think and believe on other subjects and to use your assumptions to conclude that my disagreement with a conspiracy theory makes me a hypocrite.
Likewise
You should take your own advice. Stop asking the same questions when you don't like the answers and keep getting ur ass handed to you
Well, it's been nice kicking your ass this past week as bad as I have. Especially gave me a few chuckles at your pretend victories and spin. Peace in the Middle East
lol
lol back to hiding behind dead children
lol more self e-victories proclamations
lol hypocrites can't read this post
I honestly don't recall ridiculing you. If I have, then please have my apology -- I try to make it a point around here to disagree with ideas (sometimes sarcastically) but to never ridicule those who offer them. Perhaps that's a shortsighted finesse on my part and perhaps I've failed to stay true to that vow. Either way, I will rethink that approach.
I'm still struck by my apparent obligation to weigh in on all potentially-related topics in order to avoid being a hypocrite as to any of them. But if you believe I'm a hypocrite because I don't post on every subject that comes up in this forum, so be it. We can agree to disagree on that.
Very well, no problem. But I never assumed that you do or should post on all topics, that is still an exaggeration. I made the connection between Obama and children. Not all topics.
Either way, have a good day.
You apparently assume that I can't post on Sandy Hook without posting on drones -- or at least that if I post on one without the other, I'm a hypocrite. I'm not really bothered by you calling me a hypocrite, since I'm not that, but you've devoted quite a bit of cyber ink to impugning me (and others) -- and not just my views -- based on your assumptions drawn from what I (we) haven't posted. That's a pretty remarkable willingness to attack people based purely on an assumption.Very well, no problem. But I never assumed that you do or should post on all topics, that is still an exaggeration. I made the connection between Obama and children. Not all topics.
Either way, have a good day.
Frankly, most of the time, I choose not to post in threads precisely because I think the discussions have devolved into partisan name calling and rampant assumptions about motives such that the threads themselves no longer provide a particularly useful forum for discussion. So, I'd advise you to discern beliefs from silence with some caution.
I don't remember FWDT coming on here after the Sandy Hook incident and expressing rage.
That's not true. I was pointing out that a greater number of children were killed by the President you support, and that it's sad that you didn't show outrage for that, but instead chose to wanna tear someone down for believing a conspiracy theory about children that the President you support used as pawns for political agenda, as if the government has never been a part of a conspiracy or planned things like that before. I'd advise you to be a bit more open minded and read Operation Northwoods before assuming the government is so innocent and that others are so offensive for suggesting otherwise. And you are correct on the name calling. I barely did that myself just recently to some others who have done this to every single one of my topics. But I blocked the trolls, and that's a better way to deal with that, however you may disagree.
You know, SA210 is this close to making me in favor of dead babies.
lol SA210 being a lying bag as usual.
My agenda is poverty, but right now there seems to be a huge group of people in America, yourself included who won't really speak up for defensless kids. So you know, I bring that subject up, and lowlife trolls like yourself feel like you aren't doing enough in your life and the only way to hide that is to troll the person bringing it up, just to make yourself feel better. That about sums it up. Thanks again for not adding anything whatsoever to the forum. I have some libertarian friends btw who laughed at your posts and are truly ashamed that you call yourself one, no joke lol. You will be headed to my list pretty soon, since you have proven time and again (regardless of anything else unfunny that you spew after this) that you never ever debate anything with me at all, you only troll. You should get a girlfriend or something, find a hobby besides living online. For your own mental health
You add piles of youtube/meme to the forum, hypocrite.
Wonder how the parents would feel if they knew you were using their dead kids to score political points on a website...
If you really gave a damn you would know they are protesting over there to call attention to their children being murdered by drones, it isn't for political points, I try discussing it because it's important to me, and I figured other human beings would care as well. You and other childish jerks have used every opportinty to turn that all around and makes jokes out of the situation. You should be ashamed of yourself. I'm sure they would appreciate you trying to silence someone trying to bring up a discussion on what they are trying to bring attention to.
The drones killing of children is a different topic than the conspiracy of the killings at Sandy Hook. You shifted from one topic to another in this thread and still have not answered what you believe the conspiracy is all about at Sandy Hook.
And just because someone doesn't comment on one topic doesn't mean he shouldn't comment on another because they are two different topics.
You never actually said what you think really happened on 9/11 tbh. You melted down like you did here last night, but you never answered any questions about it.This is how much of a fake you are. You know my stance on vaccines, FDA, pharmaceutical drugs, the wars, GMO's, Obama, Bush, 9/11, and you somehow want to "pretend" that I'm afraid to tell you what I have already said in other threads about Sandy Hook?! You know damn well I don't giva F**** lol
I'd be satisfied if you just stay on topic here and say who you think killed the kids at Sandy Hook. Is it really that difficult for you?
This is all about advancing gubment conspiracies, Barry/lib s being corrupt and peddling the great Ron Paul behind dead childrens photos, memes and youtubes.
CN is somebody I probably don't agree with on many topics politically or economically, but one thing he can do is articulate his ideas without hiding behind dead children, tbh...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
