Reply With Quote
As I previously said, I consider future purchases being limited as infringing. What have I, a law abiding citizen, done to deserve such treatment?
Very true. Now find me a single person who believes the mentally ill should have the right to bear arms. What a stupid ing question.
As I previously said, I consider future purchases being limited as infringing. What have I, a law abiding citizen, done to deserve such treatment?
so...if they're non transferrable, waht happens in 50 years when all the owners of these guns die and they are unable to pass them on, and there are no new ones being produced? yep, in 50 years they will have castrated the 2nd amendment, this is why NO restrictions are to be passed, it isn't ANYONE'S business how big of a gun i own, if you want to take the guns from law abiding gun owners or even our GRANDCHILDREN you're going to have to fight us, plain and simple.
I was simply establishing the fact that you support federal gun control. An now it is a matter of degree. You think gun control should go no further than background checks - only infringing on the rights of the mentally ill and felons to keep and bear arms. Others disagree and think more drastic steps can be taken to reduce gun crime. What we know is that the people have the right to keep and bear arms, but as you appear to agree that right is not unlimited.
Is it tiring being fake outraged by so many imaginary things that don't happen?
And why would anyone from stormfront follow the NBA in any way?
What has the law abiding mentally ill person done to have his rights infringed upon?
It's really a moot point since you have already agreed that the federal government has the right to infringe on the right to bear arms by denying some people the right to own a gun via a background check. If congress passes a law preventing the sale of a certain gun (it won't), it is your responsibility to follow that law.
So they are STILL not coming for your guns. You are running away anyway so I don't think that you will have 2nd amendment protections in costa rica or canada or wherever you are running to.
I also haven't seen you getting so angry about the fact that they Westboro baptist church has to get city permits to protest... They have first amendment rights!
yes slowly taking away our 2nd amendment through attrition while not as radical is still considered infringing on our 2nd amendment rights
What has the law abiding mentally ill person done to be denied the right to drive?.....oh yeah, pass a test.
And if congress does pass such a law, consider me a criminal, along with tens of millions more.
Not quite sure where you're going with this. Would you be ok with gun regulation requiring potential gun owners to take a test show they are capable of handling a firearm?
So you would buy a banned gun? Why haven't you gone out an purchased fully automatic assault rifle?
Does a drivers license make you a safe driver?
I can't afford a fully auto at the moment.
Not necessarily, but I am glad that it is a requirement.
Why do you think fully automatic weapons are as expensive as they are? The technology is not complicated.
why don't you modify your semis
I can't afford or even find the ammo to make that happen. Besides, I don't find fully automatic weapons useful or practical.
Pusher......are you afraid of guns?
TSA......are you hypervigilant?
no one's coming for your guns, yet.
It makes for good discussion.
And I really enjoy shooting guns.
So...
What is the bill number? It would be nice to read this for ourselves.
No. You're the paranoid one. Not me. They're coming to get my guns! I gotta get more guns to protect myself! Obama has a laser sight trained on my liberty! !
If I was as paranoid as you think I am, why would sell an AR15?
because you exploit the paranoia of other paranoid dumb s to make a few $$
Then I'm obviously not paranoid.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions