it's true: the crazy stuff candidates say can and do come back to haunt them in the form of lost votes.
it's true: the crazy stuff candidates say can and do come back to haunt them in the form of lost votes.
yep, crazy, racist Repug crackers on the right gonna kill immigration reform, and then the Dems will kill them FOR THEIR HATEFUL LANGUAGE AND OBSTRUCTIONISM in 2014 and 2016 (at least in those districts where the Repugs haven't gerrymandered themselves into eternal victory).
I think Darrin is sensitive to the term "cracker" in this context.
Sorry, cracker.
The left hears dog whistles and code words, but their own hate is clearly audible.
So Darrin, you consider the word "cracker" as used above to be hate speech?
Yes or no.
I like crackers
Darrin Race Thread!
That show is constantly trying to beat out Ed Shultz
The liberal version of FOX News.
obviously the left hates, and the media openly makes fun of, white people.
there is a double standard there and a bit of hypocrisy. calling the House GOP crackers strikes me as catty and undignified for a pro broadcaster. understood that standards for diction and demeanor may be changing.
were you offended?
LOL...
My sense of being offended comes from the fact society thinks it's OK to say "cracker," but not "niggеr." This too, is a double standard.
does the word "cracker" offend you as such, or only that its use is socially tolerated?My sense of being offended comes from the fact society thinks it's OK to say "cracker," but not "niggеr." This too, is a double standard.
I have a degree of discomfort when someone calls me that. No more than other derogatory words though. I do however, see it's usage every bit as racist as someone calling another a niggеr.
there is a LOT to despise, hate on what the Repugs/VRWC/1% have done and continue doing to the country.
And your BIG LIE is of false equilance, that the left is just as bad as the right, which is the ONLY defesne you right-wingers try to bring. IT SIMPLY AIN'T SO.
The Confederate states, their racists, their Bible-thumping "Christians", their old, white, male assholes, now dominate the Repug party, joined by ignorant, equivalent bubbas from red states. And they're all being exploited by the Repugs with on social issues to vote Repug. So, yes, cracka is the correct, appropriate word in describing the Repug Southern racists.
lol..
when white people are called crackers during their enslavement you may have a point...
Really WC? I didn't think that there was a single person alive (or dead) who react with anything but mild amusement when called cracker/cracka or honky.
I've posted it before but:
I would watch the whole thing, but as it relates to this conversation: go to about 2:00.
That being said I agree that it isn't very professional for someone on the news to use.
your zeal against racial injustice does you credit, Wild Cobra, but you might be overstating the equivalence.
those mean old minorities -- in collusion with elite, self-hating liberals -- are keeping the white man down. the racism of it is just appalling.
they called 'em crackers 'cuz they'd "crack the whip" on the backs of slaves. not so much derogatory since it implies a level of dominance and control over black people. whereas, n----r is meant to degrade and to treat blacks as less than and subservient to whites. I wouldn't say they are on equal footing, but do agree that it was an inappropriate comment by a commie lib.
I roughly agree with that last part. It was bush.
as for the cracker thing, I thought they were subsumed more generically as teamsters, as in "I'm just a good ole Florida cracker."
dunno. might be apocryphal.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)