Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 39 of 39
  1. #26
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    one of the very best economic analysts going:

    Economy Shrinks -- Here's Why It's Not Bad News ...

    http://www.alternet.org/print/econom...s-not-bad-news



    and btw

    Obama’s Job Approval Hits Three Year High

    Fresh off of victory and his second inauguration President Obama has seen his job approval rating soar to the highest it has been since the beginning of his first term. According to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll 60 percent of Americans approve of the job Obama is doing and 37 percent disapprove. Obama’s approval rating had been struck around 50 percent for the last few years but has increased significantly in recent months.

    Obama’s inauguration speech also received high markers. The poll found 51 percent approved of the speech and only 24 percent disapproved, with the rest having no opinion.

    http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/201...ree-year-high/

  2. #27
    Rising above the Fray spursncowboys's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    7,669
    With a shrinking population especially within the realm of 'haves' you can count on it.
    What do you mean. There are going to be less people in the upper income? Less rich people?

  3. #28
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,321
    Consumer spending added 1.5 percentage points to GDP, and business investment added 1.1 points (source: Fox news). That's basically a 2.6% uptick from the private sector alone. It's the private sector that will need to pull the economy forward, so that's a positive outcome in my book.

    I think most of us can agree that certain government spending needs to be cut, and defense is a fair place to start. Now cutting government spending will drag down the economy, so the net GDP growth going forward might well turn out to be lower than expected. But that's OK in my book as long as the private sector keeps growing. Over the next several months I'll be primarily following the private sector's contribution to GDP. Once a lower, more stable level of government spending is reached, then I'll be interested in the overall GDP number.

    Also, another factor in this quarter's GDP drop was the fall in inventories. If consumer demand has grown, businesses will grow inventory, so this is unlikely to repeat. All in all, I think the next quarter will still show a modest overall GDP growth, mostly fueled by private sector consumption and investment.
    Nice analysis. Thx!

  4. #29
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    What do you mean. There are going to be less people in the upper income? Less rich people?
    how many millionaires+ have enough kids equal or greater than replacement number?

    Certainly most recent college grads with $25K average college debt, and many with much more, won't be buying houses, new cars, or are starting families for many years.

  5. #30
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    How More Austerity Will Push The U.S. Further Away From Full Employment



    http://thinkprogress.org/economy/201...ll-employment/

    The Banksters Great (Jobs) Depression continues to screw 10Ms of Americans (Banksters doing OK)

    Has any Repug mentioned "23 million unemployed (Obama's fault)" since the Pres campaign was over?

  6. #31
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    Another great, laughable link, brought to you by ShazBot.
    Last edited by Wild Cobra; 01-30-2013 at 04:26 PM.

  7. #32
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    "buy shazbot"? I'm way out of your price range

  8. #33
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    "buy shazbot"? I'm way out of your price range
    No...

    is cheap, and I don't want any.

  9. #34
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    No...

    is cheap, and I don't want any.
    whoa! you're really at the top of your game.

    And what makes you laugh at the GDP that is still-cratered by the Banskters?

  10. #35
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    whoa! you're really at the top of your game.

    And what makes you laugh at the GDP that is still-cratered by the Banskters?
    I'm not laughing at the GDP. It's no laughing matter. I'm laughing at your assessment.

  11. #36
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,886
    What do you mean. There are going to be less people in the upper income? Less rich people?
    A shrinking population in and of itself leads to less economic transactions but by wealth being concentrated into a smaller and ever smaller pool that tends to save their money as it is furthers the issue. Do you think one man with $5m spends more or less than the total of 5 people with $1m each?

  12. #37
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,321
    A shrinking population in and of itself leads to less economic transactions but by wealth being concentrated into a smaller and ever smaller pool that tends to save their money as it is furthers the issue. Do you think one man with $5m spends more or less than the total of 5 people with $1m each?
    I've never approached this idea from that angle but I would guess the 5 w/1 million would outspend the single with 5 mill. Rather handily I suspect.

  13. #38
    Lab Animal Capt Bringdown's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    11,443
    Why defense spending plunged 22% last quarter — and killed GDP

    Government defense expenditures plunged by a staggering 22.2 percent between October and December. According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the Pentagon spent significantly less on just about everything except military pay. Had the Pentagon not cut back on spending, the economy would have grown at a weak but positive 1.27 percent pace.

    Was this big plunge in defense spending unusual? Yes and no. To a certain extent, it’s part of a pattern: Defense spending often rises in the third quarter of a year and drops in the fourth quarter.

    There’s a reason for this. The fiscal year ends in September, and government agencies typically try to spend all the money Congress allotted them for that year by then — otherwise, they fear, they’ll get a smaller budget next time around.

    “In the Pentagon, you have to use it or lose it by the end of the fiscal year in September,” said Lawrence Korb, a former assistant secretary of defense now at the Center for American Progress, in a recent interview. “You see this a lot. ‘We’ve got to fly a lot this month for training, otherwise Congress will take back the money they gave us.’”
    - more - >

  14. #39
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    Why defense spending plunged 22% last quarter — and killed GDP
    Such decreases in my experience are normal... but at the end of the fiscal year, and not to that degree.

    The fiscal year and calendar year are not the same Captain!

    I suggest something else is likely the case.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •