Damn, Cenk Uyger on The Young Turks goes off on Obama, calls him out on his lies, for protecting Bush, and his attack on heroes/whistle-blowers.
Obama needs to drone up to his mistakes
Wow, nothing is going to change!
most "transparent" administration ever
what else do all y'all expect from Fox Repug Propaganda's fist-bumping, foreign-born, terrorist Muslim president?
In that same show, they also covered "Why Obama is Deeply Conservative"
Because he's an anticolonialist marxist fascist liberation theologist muslim.
Duh.
Great interview with the hero that Obama is imprisoning. Ever since he blew the whistle on torture in 2007 he has been investigated, and also audited by the IRS every year since.
Transparency/Hope/Change
Abby Martin talks to former CIA official, and torture whistleblower, John Kiriakou, about his prison sentence and Obama's war on whistleblowers. Wraps up the show with a discussion with Media Roots journalist, Robbie Martin, about the gradual deterioration of civil liberties in the US and its relevance to past times of war.
Last edited by SA210; 01-31-2013 at 10:35 PM.
LOL SA210..
lol She forgot to mention imprisoning innocent whistleblowers, NDAA, protecting Wallstreet, protecting Bush/Cheney from war crimes, Americans murdered by drones without trial, child drone murders, expansion of illegal wars, NSA wiretapping, record pot busts, deportations, etc
Last edited by SA210; 02-01-2013 at 12:16 AM.
cant forget to mention if didnt happen
Oh, but they did happen..and they are happening
Bradley Manning is an innocent whistleblower too....
Oxymoron...imprisoning innocent whistleblowers
Guessed SA210 missed this...NDAA
http://skepticalcubefarm.wordpress.c...-and-the-ndaa/He signed it because if he didn’t, defense spending including benefits to veterans and their families would not have been authorized. The sections of NDAA that many people here seem to have a problem with are sections that were added into the do ent by primarily Republican legislators and which the President adamantly opposes but was powerless to stop. I’ll repeat that: the parts of this bill that many people here hate were included against the President’s wishes and in a way that he is powerless to stop. The only way he could have stopped these sections from being included would have been to try to veto the bill in its entirety, a move that would have been both political suicide as well as being futile, as Congress would simply have overridden him. He is explicit in his opposition to exactly the parts of the bill everyone here hates, going so far as to detail exactly which sections he opposes and why."
protecting Wallstreet,
So much so that they donated to Romney by a wide margin
http://blogs.marke ch.com/thetell/2011/08/22/obama-l...Sixty-seven New York City metro area financial-sector workers who donated at least once to Obama in 2008 have directed more than $147,000 in contributions to Romney’s campaign, the Capitol Hill newspaper reported.
Only three of the 67 have given to Obama this year, the Hill reported.
You want war crimes? Call your Senator.protecting Bush/Cheney from war crimes
Don't give aid to extremistsAmericans murdered by drones without trial
record pot busts
Wow, Dan. I figured you wouldn't stoop to that level. I guess you missed where Chris Hedges won in Federal court to overturn that specific provision in NDAA on indefinite detention of US Citizens, and how OBAMA appealed that decision within 24 hours.
Obama administration has already appealed yesterday's historic court ruling. That court ruling found indefinite detention to be uncons utional, and issued a permanent block of that provision.
When did the 16 year old American boy from Colorado do that? Where is the charge or accusation that he did anything wrong?
So much so that they donated to Romney by a wide margin
http://blogs.marke ch.com/thetell/2011/08/22/obama-l...
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=208501
Well more raids than Bush, in half the time
http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com...ikes-in-2012-2Reported civilian deaths fell sharply in Pakistan in 2012, with Bureau data suggesting that a minimum of 2.5% of those reported killed were civilians – compared with more than 14% in 2011. This suggests the CIA is seeking to limit non-militant casualties, perhaps as a result of sustained criticism.
Drone strikes in Pakistan are now at their lowest level in five years, as Islamabad protests almost every attack. The CIA also appears to have abandoned ‘signature strikes’ on suspected militants fitting certain patterns of behaviour – at least for the present. Almost all attacks in recent months have been against named al Qaeda and other militant leaders.
So when did Bush types of crimes suddenly become ok, 2008? How convenient.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
