well deserved
He's about to rack up more awards. I don't think he prepared that many speeches.
Thank God, the sportswriters made the right choice.
So where do we put him?
1.Jim Brown
2.Barry Sanders
3.Walter Payton
4.Adrian Peterson
????
We really do have to go with...dominance of era...but how do we ignore he's doing his thing against the greatest defensive players ever as a whole?
if Sanders had played when Brown did it would have looked just like a video game. Runs that last 2 minutes as he zigged and zagged all over the place with those slow white cats chasing him.
What a ty post.
Nobody can ever accuse you of a lack of perseverance.
Sorry man...
Jim Brown (Syracuse) was a Cleveland Brown, he ruled the late 50's mid 60's. 6-2 230 and fast with agility.
Barry Sanders (Oklahoma St) was a Detrot Lion, incredible elusiveness, on a whole different level when it came to getting out of trouble running.
Walter Payton (Jackson St) was a Chicago Bear, the guy was a human wrecking ball with agilty and good speed.
Of course you know that Peterson (Oklahoma) is the best of the Viking backs, yep, ahead of Robert Smith (Ohio St) and Chuck Foreman (Miami).
There ya go little fella.
The greatest back that we will never see on the all time yardage list......Gale Sayers (Bears/Kansas)......only O,J.Simpson (Bills/USC) rivaled him as far as speed goes and he was only second to Sanders when it came to...WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...running. Injuries did him in.
Last edited by Avante; 02-03-2013 at 01:32 AM.
Nothing more stupid than comparing AP to the all time greats, hahahaha!!!!!!!!!
Does it hurt not knowing anything?
AP hasn't even broken 9k yards.
take you and your crusty almanac and eat a .
Are you really that ing lame? Nobody can be that ing dense, nobody!!!!!!!!!!!!
Do you know anything about anything at all?
The guy has a career average of.....5.0....a carry and he is playing against the best defenders ever all geared to stop him. He's 27, now what do you think we are going to be seeing?
Dude, you gotta be the biggest waste of time ever on a forum, not a brain in your ing head.
Oh yeah ya dumb ...
Still wanna compare those Saint backs totals to the Niner backs?
Last edited by Avante; 02-03-2013 at 01:47 AM.
Avante, I'm gonna need you to stop leeching off my threads with your ty takes...
You're right.
Let me do it Spurtalk style.
He deserved it.
Better?
You already put him #4 of all time.
You're stupid. Again. It's old. Like your crusty almanac.
No need. I was easily right about the 49ers. You were terribly wrong, fat, old and stupid in saying the Saints stable was better.Dude, you gotta be the biggest waste of time ever on a forum, not a brain in your ing head.
Oh yeah ya dumb ...
Still wanna compare those Saint backs totals to the Niner backs?
Eat a , princess.
I can easily put him at number 4, and if you knew anything about age/avg you would to, nope, too ing dumb.
You were dead wrong about the Niners vs Saints backs, totally wrong as usual. Remember dummy we are talking "stable of backs"..I know you don't get it.
Eat a , hahahaha!!!!!!!!!!! Grow up little fella that's how little kids talk.,
There's no way you wouldn't make such a ty ranking. It's what you do.
Which means I could not have been any more dead on target correct.You were dead wrong about the Niners vs Saints backs, totally wrong as usual.
Seriously, go eat a penis.Eat a , hahahaha!!!!!!!!!!! Grow up little fella that's how little kids talk.,
Since I can name every NFL back since Beattie Feathers was the first to gain over a 1000 in a season, yep...4th.
Do I really have to compare the stats betweeen the Niner backs and Saints back to prove how wrong you were....again?
Doesn't it bug you being so ing dumb, dude.....do you know anything?
I'm really starting to pity ya guy.
Sorry man.
Boy howdy AP sure deserves it.
Better?
Never seen a football forum so..."keep it simple"...in my life. No wonder nobody here knows . Just a bunch of punk kids trying to act badass in hiding. No a ing brain among them.
Last edited by Avante; 02-03-2013 at 03:49 AM.
I don't care what names you pull from the crusty ol almanac. Your basic thinking skills are ty.
Knock yourself out, princess. The pile is already enormous; one more ty take won't matter at this point.Do I really have to compare the stats betweeen the Niner backs and Saints back to prove how wrong you were....again?
Doesn't it bug you being so ing dumb, dude.....do you know anything?
I'm really starting to pity ya guy.
And when I tell you to chew on a , it's just advice on how you can do your part to improve this forum. Nothing more.![]()
You mean those thinking skills that has a guy totally dominating the best defensive athletes of all time?And thinking just maybe averaging 5.0 yards a carry vs that level of compe ion is far more awe inspiring that what others before him were doing. Do you have a clue about what I'm even talking about?
If you are really worried about this forum then why not try and educate yourself on the game instead of bugging those who know the game with all your stupid bull and....suck a .....what are you re ed?
Grow up little freak, learn the game. Why do you even post on a football forum?
Princess, you have no clue what you are even talking about.
you don't know . That's why your posts are .If you are really worried about this forum then why not try and educate yourself on the game instead of bugging those who know the game with all your stupid bull and....suck a .....what are you re ed?
I'm here to talk football with other posters that know the game.Grow up little freak, learn the game. Why do you even post on a football forum?
Go eat a , princess.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)