If Hitler Won World War II We'd Have A Better, More Just World Today
.
Legendary U.S. General George S. Patton realized late in the war that the United States fought the wrong country. Patton felt the U.S. should have sided with Germany to destroy Jewish Bolshevik/Communist USSR. This information comes from Patton's diary entries, letters he wrote to his wife, and comments he made to military officers and staff.
World War II was incredibly complex. However, in the final analysis, WWII was essentially a war between two competing ideologies: Nationalism -vs- Jewish Internationalism/globalism. Adolf Hitler and his allies fought to preserve the concept of Nationalism, not just for Germans but for all peoples the world over. Nationalism really just means the sovereignty of an ethnic people and the right of such ethnic people/nationalists -within their own bordered country - to self-determination. What is meant by self-determination? Self-determination just means an ethnic people preserving their unique culture & heritage and pursuing their collective goals as a unique people. This applies to any ethnic peoples: Nigerians, Germans, Swedes, Vietnamese, Mexicans, Tibetans, etc.
On the other side of WWII was Jewish Bolshevik Internationalism (today we just call this 'globalism'). This is the Jewish worldview (or rather, plan) to eventually eliminate all nations except for a Jewish homeland... (what was later to be - after WWII - the nation of Israel in 1948). Jewish Internationalism/globalism seeks to eventually merge all peoples in the world into one globalist system with a global government, global bank, global currency, etc. In short, Jewish globalism (i.e., the weakening and eventual elimination of all nations) is the exact opposite of Nationalism (i.e., a worldcomposed of nations). The Allied powers of WWII (led by Roosevelt, Churchill, Stalin, et al) were tools of International Jewry and thus de facto fighting for the Jewish globalist worldview. After the (Jewish run) Allies won WWII in 1945, International Jewish forces were then free to exercise a Jewish 'Sphere of Influence' over the greater Western World (and as we see today, increasingly over the rest of the world).
Alternatively, if Hitler had won World War II and then exercised a Nationalist'Sphere of Influence' over the greater Western World, we'd have a more just, fair, and moral Western World today. The rest of the world would have similarly benefited had the Germans been victorious since German influence would have surely spread elsewhere (ideas such as non-usurious banking and strong family oriented culture would likely have spread globally).
Had Hitler won World War II, what would be different in the post war world? Here are a few examples:
1 - No USSR (the Soviet government murdered millions of its own people during its 70 year reign - to study this topic read the writings of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn; Hitler would have liberated the USSR, though taking large parts of its Western region for lebensraum, "living space")
2 - No cold war (because there would beno USSR)
3 - No Communist Eastern Europe/Iron Curtain (when WWII ended, Eastern Europe fell to Communism - this was part of Stalin's spoils of war)
4 - No Red China and Mao's subsequent killing of 40 - 60 million Chinese (the USSR created favorable conditions for Mao's Communists which ultimately led to Mao's victory over Chiang Kai-shek's Nationalists in 1949, thus if no USSR, no Mao victory)
5 - No Communist North Vietnam (both the Soviet Union and Red China aided Ho Chi Minh)
6 - No Communist Cambodia and Pol Pot's slaughter of 2 million Cambodians (Red China aided Pol Pot)
7 - No dividing Korea into North Korea & South Korea (the allies split Korea after WWII ended, with North Korea becoming Communist... another of Stalin's spoils of war)
8 - No Communist Cuba (given the previous, what support would Castro have had in the 1950's?)
9 - No Communism anywhere (Hitler was the world's most fervent anti-Communist)
10 - Liberalism & multiculturalism wouldn't dominate Western ethos (both are Jewish creations and both have always been heavily promoted/advanced by Jews; thus if no Jewish influence, then no liberalism and no multiculturalism... at least certainly nowhere near the degree we see today)
11 - No Cultural Marxism and no political correctness (these are social engineering "tools" which came out of the Jewish think tank known as the Frankfurt School)
12 - No third world immigration into Western nations (Jews wouldn't be in power positions to craft and force through liberal immigration laws; Jews are responsible for each and every Western nation's liberal immigration policy/laws, as all were orchestrated by a consortium consisting of the World Jewish Congress, the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, and B'nai B'rith)
13 - No depraved filth on TV, in movies, etc. (because Jews wouldn't run Hollywood)
14 - No widespread pornography (Jewish lawyers and Jewish activists were the main challengers of anti-obscenity laws, under the guise of "Freedom of Speech")
15 - There would still be prayer in public schools (Jewish lawyers were instrumental in banning prayer in public schools under the guise of so-called "separation of church and state," something that appears nowhere in the U.S. Cons ution)
16 - No man-hating radical feminist movement (Jews such as Betty Friedan, Sonia Pressman, and Gloria Steinem, among others, were the key drivers of radical feminism)
17 - No Israel and all the problems it has brought the USA and the immeasurable misery it has wrought on the Palestinians
18 - Jews would be living in Madagascar (perhaps) and would be carefully monitored (Madagascar was one place Hitler considered as a Jewish homeland)
Many reading this will ask, "But what about the Holocaust?" The Holocaust has been grossly exaggerated by organized Jewry in order to create sympathy for Jews worldwide and thus help advance the Jewish agenda (i.e., people seen as victims tend to get their way). It is also used as a political weapon to justify Israeli militarism against the Palestinians. Hitler's Final Solution (rebranded in the early 1970's as the "Holocaust") was a plan to remove Jews from Europe, not to kill them. During WWII, just as the U.S. couldn't trust Japanese Americans, thus causing FDR to round many of them up and place them in concentration camps, Hitler couldn't trust Jews since many were partisans sympathetic to the USSR and hence they aided the USSR in various subversive, anti-German activities. Therefore the Nazis rounded up Jews and placed them in concentration camps.
Somewhere around one million Jews died during WWII (not six million) mostly due to disease and starvation in the final months of the war. Heavy Allied bombing of Germany and parts of German occupied Europe destroyed many roads, rail lines, and bridges making it impossible for Germany to adequately supply the camps with food and medicine. The result is that many Jews died of starvation and disease; and of course many non-Jews also died of starvation and disease (again, due to a massive Allied bombing campaign and its destruction of German transportation infrastructure). Lastly, there were no "gas chambers." Much has been written about this. To study the "gas chamber" subject, read the research papers published by Germar Rudolf & Carlo Mattogno (there are many others as well). To get a broad overview of the Holocaust, read my article, What Was The Holocaust... What Actually Happened?
It should also be noted that Hitler never wanted to "conquer the world." He simply wanted to safeguard Europe and the greater Western World from all manner of nefarious Jewish influence and, more broadly, safeguard the world-at-large specifically from, 1) usurious Jewish banking and, 2) Jewish-driven cultural degradation.
As previously stated, the Allied heads-of-State (Roosevelt, Churchill, et al) were puppets of International Jewry; each sold his soul for power and prestige. Again, as earlier stated, World War II was a war between two competing ideologies: Nationalism -vs- Jewish Bolshevik Internationalism/globalism -- unfortunately International Jewry won.
Was World War II "the good war" as is often claimed? No, it was exactly the opposite. The Allied victory marked the beginning of the end of Western Civilization.
tbh..
russians worshiped stalin, because he saved them from the nazis, the ones that he killed were colateral damage, you could say, no one's perfect, id rather have some russians die than be conquered by germans, and you should be thanking Stalin, if he didn't stop Hitler, you'd be screaming Seig Heil! today
Americans woulda got there either way tbh. Stalin helped but he ed the russian people overall. They should have listened to Patton and just marched into Russiarussians worshiped stalin, because he saved them from the nazis, the ones that he killed were colateral damage, you could say, no one's perfect
One of Hitler's biggest mistake was rushing Operation Barbarossa. He got too greedy.
I had a dream one night to stab Stalin in the back. So sue me.
lol? hitler had all of europe but britain annexed when he attacked russia, if he beat russia, he would have drove to the middle east and far east, pretty much conquering the whole world other than americas, you do realize nazi's had a far superior war machine than the sideshow allies? they send 5 divisions on d day, hitler would have all over on this puny invasion force if thats the only front he was fighting on, but of course that wasn't the case he was taking in the rear from the russians who already pretty much won the war by the time america stepped in, lol wow, the australian educational system is even worse than the american one
It was our snazzy uniforms that did it. You can't say our SS troops looked great while flipping the switch to gas the juden.
You getting better at this, im impressed, but he actually kept delaying this particular operation, to the point where he had less time in the summer to attack russia, thereby causing his soldiers not to have winter clothing and not reaching moscow in time, causing the nazi troops to freeze to death instead. If you mean in general, he attacked russia to soon, then yes, I agree he should have taken out britain first, rather than fight a war on two fronts.
commies and yids were the true winners of the war, the rest of us were all losers tbh
they warshiped him because he brainwashed those people, he "saved" russians from nazis and put them into a situation which might be even worserussians worshiped stalin, because he saved them from the nazis, the ones that he killed were colateral damage, you could say, no one's perfect
No doubt, nazi fashion sense was ahead of its time, IMO TBH
Great converstation, carry on !!
Too bad, where are those NAZI trolls when needed ??
C/o Hugo Boss. Yes, det perfume maker.
Hugo Boss did some great stuff for us; why do you think so many French es opened their homes and legs when we strolled down those lovely roads of theirs. Did you know they planted those trees so we can walk in the shade? Lovable bas s
an educational system that doesn't brainwash the kids ain't nearly as bad as one that does tbh. japan would control the vast majority of asia and make the whole region as prosper as today's japan is.
"who already won the war when americans stepped in"? what actually happened in history seemed just the opposite to me tbh. russian pussies were too scared to fight them germans until they were pushed to the brink of precipice, and they refused to declare war against japan in the east until AMERICANS dropped the atom bombs on japan. russian schools must teach your heads to turn a blind eye to what happened from 1941 to 1945 in the pacific tbh.
True that, the Allied are so damn bland, meh, especially those GIs. Only the British's Red Devils can wow me somehow. OTOH, those Italians WW2 troops, that's a true LOL case.
you're exposing your ignorance yet again, it was no secret that hitler intended to attack russia from the start, he was preaching to his followers before he even acquired power in germany, russia's economy in the 30's was prehistoric, were stalin's means brutal in modernizing it? yes, but sometimes it takes a bad mother er to defeat someone as evil as hitler, and stalin had no intention of conquering the world, all he did was defend russia and the world against unprovoked nazi aggression
You believe that Greater East Asia co-prosperity sphere ?Japan invaded because they were running out of resources and they joined the Axis powers because it would be a nice cop-out for being ruthless savages.
But hey if you believe that they did that so Asia could be as prosperous and weird as them.
Great converstation, carry on !!
Too bad, where are those NAZI trolls when needed ??
Let's face it, I can't be friends with this asshole. I tried, I really did. Goebbels helped me wake from that awful nightmare though.
They were good men
How's Eva? Still overdosing on cyanide?
lol germans were the best fighting machine to date, the ed up all of europe, before attacking russia, it just shows the resilience of the russian soldiers that they were able to stem the tide and turn the tables, thereby butt ing germany in return, its true what they say, you're only as good as you compe ion, you do realize(most likely not) the war in the east after the defeat of germany was a joke, veteran russian forces rolled all over the jap ties in china, there was no need for atomic bombs,
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
