Huh? I'm taking the PPD the site is showing me?You're an imbecile if you're taking the posts per day the site its showing you at worth. As I said already, you cant go basely on that. Secondly, you're taking my entire post count over whatever years I have been posting here and applying it to your registering date.
How is that even remotely accurate? You would have go gather posts I made say in 2009 and then compare them to your own.
Comparing 4 years versus 1 year
The time between your registration date and today is 1565 days. You've made 10311 posts, so that's a 6.58849840256 posts per day.
The time between my registration date and today is 397 days. Let's say 2400 posts, so that's a 6.04534005038 ppd
You actually have an advantage when I compare 4 years versus 1 year. Chances are, the average poster would begin to post less and less on average, as more time passes by.
faulty math
http://web.archive.org/web/200902070...er.php?u=14412
Total Posts: 1,573 (15.84 posts per day)
Another proof why you have an advantage, you ing idiot
That weakass dunk got you wet? Come stronger son.
No, wrong.Huh? I'm taking the PPD the site is showing me?
The time between your registration date and today is 1565 days. You've made 10311 posts, so that's a 6.58849840256 posts per day.
The time between my registration date and today is 397 days. Let's say 2400 posts, so that's a 6.04534005038 ppd
You actually have an advantage when I compare 4 years versus 1 year. Chances are, the average poster would begin to post less and less on average, as more time passes by.
I started out only posting a handful of posts only in the Spurs forum. I rarely posted in the NBA forum at all when I first started.
Also, I used to leave on the off season and come back later in the season. I am posting more now then I ever did.
My average posting a few years ago was probably in the tank. In a span of a year my Posts per day have inflated to whatever they are now.
Time to get your GED buddy.
That weakass dunk got you wet? Come stronger son.
Told you Dwight wouldn't cover up that ty perimeter defense and LeBron/Wade would have a field day.
You're hopeless dude.http://web.archive.org/web/200902070...er.php?u=14412
Total Posts: 1,573 (15.84 posts per day)
Another proof why you have an advantage, you ing idiot
Oh ok, so you're posting now more than you've ever did. Is that why you have a 15.84 PPD in 2009? And I had 2.5 midway through 2012?
- shadowflamesYou'll never win this argument.
Screw all of you all.
he exposed me again
10k+ posts over a 5 year period is less than 5 posts per day.
WrongI don't post during the off season
Changing arguements? How thick are you?
Oh ok, so you're posting now more than you've ever did. Is that why you have a 15.84 PPD in 2009? And I had 2.5 midway through 2012?
I made a comment about my posting in the NBA forum exclusively and that my posts per day were the lowest they've ever been at that time since I only posted there.
I am making a point that your stupid basis of taking the stat the site is giving you and applying it for however many years is idiotic.
In other words, since I know you have problem with comprehension this means that the more posts you make in a day the more inflated that stat gets. The less you make the lower it gets. Simple enough.
In case you fail to understand let me say it in a way even you would understand..
Posts Per Day ac ulates how many posts you make every day for a period of time (Less than a year) then it crunches that number into your average posts per however many posts you make in a month.
You're taking that erratic statistic and trying to apply it to years instead of days, weeks or up to a month which is what its design to do.
There is a reason why its posts per day and not posts per year.
Changing arguements? How thick are you?
I made a comment about my posting in the NBA forum exclusively and that my posts per day were the lowest they've ever been at that time since I only posted there.
I am making a point that your stupid basis of taking the stat the site is giving you and applying it for however many years is idiotic.
In other words, since I know you have problem with comprehension this means that the more posts you make in a day the more inflated that stat gets. The less you make the lower it gets. Simple enough.
In case you fail to understand let me say it in a way even you would understand..
Posts Per Day ac ulates how many posts you make every day for a period of time (Less than a year) then it crunches that number into your average posts per however many posts you make in a month.
You're taking that erratic statistic and trying to apply it to years instead of days, weeks or up to a month which is what its design to do.
There is a reason why its posts per day and not posts per year.
10k+ posts over a 5 year period is less than 5 posts per day.
All I have to understand is, I have a lower PPD than you in any method of your choice.
I'm not taking your NBA forum/Spurs forum changing the argument bull , or your offseason breaks in consideration. Right now anybody that's reading this would get the point I'm making and not yours.
Umm not quite. 10K posts over the years I have been posting here is about right which was the point I made when you said I didn't have a life or whatever therefore invalidating your attempt at trying to be funny and at the same time proving your idiocy by trying to post smack talk me.
All I have to understand is, I have a lower PPD than you in any method of your choice.
You have much to learn.
I
Here, you know what, I'll attempt to explain your argument or lack thereofUmm not quite. 10K posts over the years I have been posting here is about right which was the point I made when you said I didn't have a life or whatever therefore invalidating your attempt at trying to be funny and at the same time proving your idiocy by trying to post smack talk me.
You have much to learn.
I
A. The original argument is based on who has less of a life
B. You insisted on calculating posts per day to determine the solution
C. I calculate using the simplest formula: Amount of posts divided by the amount of days since registration= Posts per ing day
D. You think I'm still basing every thing off of the Posts per day that the site gives me
E. I'm basing everything off of the official amount of posts, and the legitimate amount of time since registration between the two of us
F. You have a higher PPD than me.
G. You bring in the offseason idle factor, which further hurts your PPD argument.
H. You still think I'm basing off of the # that the site gives me
I. Now you're changing the argument to "you have much to learn", and GED
Son you're doing a fine job of looking like an idiot yourself.
I'm not taking your NBA forum/Spurs forum changing the argument bull , or your offseason breaks in consideration. Right now anybody that's reading this would get the point I'm making and not yours.
First of all you're taking this too seriously. Double posting and exhausting yourself. lol
I may be posting more than you right now but none cares.
Your posts still are far worst than mine. Not that I'm saying mine are 100% the best but better than yours.
In the end I still dont care about any of that. Like I told you in the worst poster thread. Who cares who's what on a board.
Oh wait, apparently you do.
Irishock, stride for internet popularity.
OH ing , you just changed your argument yet again. From the PPD failure to the worst poster argument. And i ing called it!!Son you're doing a fine job of looking like an idiot yourself.
First of all you're taking this too seriously. Double posting and exhausting yourself. lol
I may be posting more than you right now but none cares.
Your posts still are far worst than mine. Not that I'm saying mine are 100% the best but better than yours.
In the end I still dont care about any of that. Like I told you in the worst poster thread. Who cares who's what on a board.
Oh wait, apparently you do.
Irishock, stride for internet popularity.
what's next, the "your posts are worthless" card?
Actually none of that.OH ing , you just changed your argument yet again. From the PPD failure to the worst poster argument. And i ing called it!!
I'm not going to repeat myself by telling you how the Posts per day stat flatuates everytime.
I already said how worthless your arguement has been because your calculations are very innacurate.
The only thing you're failing to see is how dumb you're looking right now.
I may be posting more than you right now but none cares.
Just for s and giggles..
Just on this thread alone I have made like 10+ posts.
There is no calculations that can accurately tell how many posts I make a day then appropiately say how my average posts per day would look, which is what I have been trying to make you understand about that stat, whether you do your "calculations" based on the stat from the site or your own.
It is very exhausting trying to explain something so simple to someone that has the IQ of a re ed puppy.
I think I have been throughout in all of this.
Nash has the basketball credibility to look down at Howard? Even an over-rated Howard doesn't rate such disrespect. Nash is a media creation, a future trivia question, a nowhere man before Mike D'Antoni created a system for him. Never has the MVP award been so meaningless.
Both D'Antoni and his pet squirrel Nash belong to the World B Free wing of NBA historical oddities. All shiny objects, quickly forgotten. Fool's gold.
irishock and shadowflames need to start making out already
He proposed but I told him I dont swim that way.
So the only people that can tell the truth are those with rangs? Even though Nash is past his prime (the reason why his stats suck and he can't guard a chair) he still has the right to call Howard out. In his prime I've seen Nash play through a myriad of injuries. It shouldn't be a surprise that he is expecting the same out of Howard.
That's really stupid. So a guy like Rick Fox has more say than say a guy like Stockton just because Fox was lucky enough to play with the most dominant big man and one of the greatest coach in history? Lol Internet logic
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote