Reply With Quote
haven't hit stride, already your claims are defunct.
if your expectations got any lower we'd have to dig a hole to bury them in, SA210.
lol..logic sucks.
haven't hit stride, already your claims are defunct.
if your expectations got any lower we'd have to dig a hole to bury them in, SA210.
Last edited by Winehole23; 02-13-2013 at 02:50 AM.
no, it's just that you morons twist what I originally say and spin my point lol Easy to talk about articles, but we all know the public didn't care until MSNBC actually aired the issue consistently on TV, barely last week. lol But Wine can keep trying.
Your arguments' structural plasticity is surpassed only by WC. That your talking points are easily dissected is not the result of moronic onlookers.no, it's just that you morons twist what I originally say and spin my point lol Easy to talk about articles, but we all know the public didn't care until MSNBC actually aired the issue consistently on TV, barely last week. lol But Wine can keep trying.
Also, just for grins, try constructing a cogent post with out wagging around that confirmation bias RSS teddy bear of yours.
It's funny how you lie, I have owned all of you severely on the actual issues. But keep lying to yourselves, you need it. lol
sa210 owned me and I can't get over it
you've owned me? Not likely.
can't see his own ass in the mirror, but then, who can?
it's actually more funny this way, TB, if also more plodding . . .
plodding is my middle name. lol
TB has some kind of high annoyance threshold or a sadistic streak and therefore likes to engage these people on a regular basis.
Wait. He engages me on a regular basis too. Crap.
SA210, rendered momentarily speechless
whereeas I have a low tolerance for amusement but the highest for bull , so long as it satisfies.
bs that does not satisfy will be rejected swiftly and unsentimentally per the prevailing custom.
SA210: opinion free, fact free resentment?
commonplace. blame and self credit are similarly mal-apportioned, per usual.
yeah, that's it.
I know, duh
Isn't there some rule about declaring oneself the winner of an internet argument?
(^^^usually heavy reliance on smilies, even for SA210)
it ain't his fault. he's been in a cave . . .
imagine the Caspar Hauser scenario . . .
Well "winning" definitely isn't an out of work paralegal who spends his time online all the time instead of working, and then ignoring a thread about the guy he voted for murdering Americans without due process. I know, I know you don't have to post about every single topic all the time.Very telling though that you'd rather jump on a troll bandwagon instead of dicussing the issues of your murderous president of innocent women and babies, and even Americans. Go ahead though, it's obvious you have no clients. lol
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions