Reply With Quote
thanks, vlad.
people can get defensive when presented with the truth.
American Holocaust of Native American Indians
thanks, vlad.
people can get defensive when presented with the truth.
So it is confirmed that I never claimed to be enlightened and it is confirmed that you spoke out 'yer ass....again....per par....thanks.
What a dip .
So you hate Mexicans who have papers and are as legal as you? Are you mad about that fact?
Still doesn't mean our economy and resources can support wide open borders for everyone to waltz right through, tbh, so yes, every legal American citizen has a right to complain about illegal immigration...
Lol. Before Europeans ever set foot in America, competing Native American tribes were figuring out how to genocide each other out of existence. Trill talks about the "Disneyfied" version of America history, which also includes the false notion that Native Americans were passing each other the peace pipe and living together in some prehistoric hippy commune.
What kind of ty schools did you guys go to that didn't teach about "the trail of tears, etc, etc" in like the 5th grade. Smh
Stfu.
This is irrelevant to the topic. Stop trying to justify the American holocaust.
seriously.....just STFU
How about the truth that Africans loved slavery just as much as the white man? I'm sure your lib professor sold you on the farce that Europeans marched into Africa and took any number of unwilling Africans by force for use as slaves, but the real truth is:
"Several nations such as the Ashanti of Ghana and the Yoruba of Nigeria were involved in slave-trading. Groups such as the Imbangala of Angola and the Nyamwezi of Tanzania would serve as intermediaries or roving bands, waging war on African states to capture people for export as slaves. Historians John Thornton and Linda Heywood of Boston University estimate that 90 percent of those shipped to the New World were enslaved by Africans and then sold to European traders. Henry Louis Gates, the Harvard Chair of African and African American Studies, has stated that "without complex business partnerships between African elites and European traders and commercial agents, the slave trade to the New World would have been impossible, at least on the scale it occurred.""
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_slave_trade
How come blacks never vilify their own people for selling their ancestors to the white man?
Oh, because Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton told you it was all the white man's fault.
Talk about "Disneyfied" versions of history, of which African history might be the most Disneyfied of all.
I'm not trying to justify it. Ever since man climbed down from the trees and stood upright, he's been at war with himself over land and resources, and will take it, by force, from weaker compe ion. Man has been performing "holocausts" on his fellow man since time immemorial. And if the Native Americans had the means to expand, you can bet your ass they would've rain-danced right into Mexico or Canada (or Europe) and slaughtered the natives of those lands by the thousands. To paint them as some peaceful hippies in comparison to the evil European invaders is the height of lib political correctness. The only reason there's a massive outcry is because they lost.
What I also find funny is that when brown people slaughter each other, no one says a word. Your average hipster liberal arts major will have a manifesto length speech prepared to "educate" you on the horrors of European colonization that happened hundreds of years ago but has nothing to say on the issue of the ongoing genocide in Rwanda. The reason for this is because only white people can be evil. When brown people commit acts of atrocity, it's because "Europeans made them do it."
not gonna disagree with that but this thread is about the amerikkkan holocaust....thx
Stop correcting my willful ignorance of American history, it's hurting my lame argument!
Yes. I also hate other Native Americans.
And what's the goal of this thread?
It's not to enlighten anyone, that's for sure. Seems to me like it's another shallow attempt at guilting whites for things they weren't responsible for. Not one parcel of land on this globe was obtained "legally" and "ethically." Like I said, man has been stealing land for thousands of years. Why should white Europeans be singled out for something all races and cultures have done? I sure as ain't going to apologize, because I don't feel guilty. My Native American ancestors did the same as my European ancestors.
"The Apache migrated south and west, under pressure from the Comanche who were also expanding southward. Being pushed off the buffalo-rich Great Plains into the more austere desert and mountains of the Southwest, probably caused the Apache to become more dependent upon raiding for a livelihood. By 1692, they were present in the present-day state of Chihuahua, Mexico. They soon were also visiting Sonora and Coahuila and seem to have absorbed several other Indian peoples native to the future U.S./Mexico border area, the Suma, Manso, Jano, and Jocome. Chihuahua, Sonora, and Coahuila were more populated and richer than the Spanish colonies in New Mexico and Apache raiding soon became a serious problem."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache-Mexico_Wars
"Absorbed" means they were trading furs and passing the peace pipe around, doesn't it? Nope. They were tomahawking those mutha as.
End of the day, Europeans simply had better technology. They were no more or no less "evil" than the Natives.
On the same note, should we guilt Mexicans for their slaughter of those same Native Americans?
yea i knew about that and i'm fine with it.
the natives fought amongst one another just like the natives of other countries did.
at the end of the day, it was their land and their business.
once they saw they got bamboozled they fought alongside one another to save their rightful land.
you confirmed you are blind by your own set of rules.
but the majority here already knew that you are blind to common sense and logic.
midnightpulp giving you dumbasses a second dose of what I gave over 100 posts ago. And I'd be willing to bet SA210 still won't respond
What did I steal?
please.
there was a very small number of african countries who sold servants. those that did were selling enemies of waring factions and captives.
greeks and romans did the same thing so miss me with that nonsense.
a dose of white guilt?
you haven't learned anything
It was WHO'S land? And where were the lines? You don't believe that every square mile of this huge country had been inhabited, do you?
And how did they have any legitimate moral claim to this land in the first place? I thought they didn't believe in the concept of ownership? In addition to that, Native Americans weren't "born here." They migrated to the New World from Asia, and just as the Europeans did, took this land by force from whatever lower species of human/wildlife was inhabiting it.
it was the native americans land
he's already admitted that
white guilt is what I'm preaching against, re
they were here first.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
