Reply With Quote
According to latest media reports, the onset of senility begins with fact-checking Precious.
According to latest media reports, the onset of senility begins with fact-checking Precious.
http://americablog.com/2007/06/white...ves-again.htmlTO: WHCA
FR: Steve Scully [head of WHCA]
RE: Embargo on Briefing Room Photos
As indicated in an e-mail last week, The White House has placed an embargo on all photos of the new briefing room until Monday, January 9th [sic - I think they mean July 9]. I am trying to convince them to ease up on that in order to allow release of photos the weekend prior to our move-back date.
But please note the following from Josh Deckard in WH Press.
Questions…let me know.
—–Original Message—–
From: Deckard, Josh [Executive Office of the President]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 10:30 AM
To: mills nytimes; redmonds ap; SCULLY, STEVE;
Peter Doherty abc
Cc: Sforza, Scott N.
Subject: ASAP
Press are NOT allowed to photograph the brief room during this transition- they aren’t even supposed to be in there. Press took pictures this morning and got very rude w/ the workers when they asked them to stop.
Please make sure those pictures don’t run.
If anyone breaks this rule from here on out they will lose their pass.
Thanks
Whoops.
Butthurt begins with being exposed by a fact-check.
Facinating to watch young journos throw their former hero under the bus. And over what?
No thinkprogress or dailykos article?
The only good fact check is one done erroneously during a presidential debate.
It's always good when you get butthurt about it.
You're even getting butthurt on behalf of another poster.
that's your -for-tat. A local reporter compared to a clinton wh insider? Yeah that seems legit. Good find. I also bet you never said anything bad about Bush either
For being a drama queen. I would have reacted the same had it come from the Bush White House.
I'll let you catch up and refine your semantics.
Whoops is right...Wow I sure do have egg on my face...
I guess this works perfect as a control because the press treated the bush presidency and obama presidency the same...
There is prob a statue of this guy at every major journalism school, but now he's gone full birther. lol
Woodward was as much an insider in the Bush administration to start out. Worked pretty well for Bush at first.
Eh, you're doing your best to try and make a big deal out of it like a good little hack.
Let the others on your mailing list know.
It definitely warranted top billing on HuffPo. Story of the year, tbh.
If anything, the whole thing reeks of lack of professionalism... screaming on the phone? email to apologize? the WH doesn't have to pay attention to anybody they don't want to. But you would at least expect certain professionalism handling an area like the media.
A local reporter yelling at a president does not equal a former Clinton WH insider's editor being told by BHO's WH to stop the negative articles or they will lose their press credentials.
Very ironic that you of all people would be using the semantics argument
The big deal was made by the Obamaphiles in the media.
You're using people losing their press credentials in the same with someone threatening to take them away... Way to stay on topic as always!
Woodward was a bush insider???? Wow...Just wow... I got nothing...It's all you
There's a new "top billing" story on HuffPo every 45 minutes.
This one never should've sniffed it.
soldier boy is afraid for woodward.
no wonder we had to pay them not to kill him.
Press corps calling Woodward a swollen vag: http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/...172.html?hp=f1
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions