Reply With Quote
You Lieno idea how the Cons ution works
GFY
You Lie
GFY
Gun Activists Warn Obama is Raising a Private Black Army to Massacre White Americans
Gun Owners of America president Larry Pratt appeared Tuesday on the Talk to Solomon Show alongside conservative blogger Greg W. Howard, of Twittergate fame, for another chance to spew anti-Obama conspiracy theories.
Pratt predicted that President Obama may begin confiscating guns in order to provoke a violent response to justify further oppression, which host Stan Solomon feared would lead to the imprisonment of hundreds of thousands of people.
Pratt once again insisted that Obama is acting like King George III, a sentiment with which Solomon concurred, saying, “That will happen quickly and they will wipe those people out to set an example.”
But Solomon wasn’t finished: “I believe they will put together a racial force to go against an opposite race resistance, basically a black force to go against a white resistance, and then they will claim anyone resisting the black force they are doing it because they are racist.”
Howard agreed: “You may be right because he has been sowing the seeds of racial hatred; we were healing quite well as a nation on racial issues
After arguing that Obama is “not American” and not a natural born citizen, Howard maintained that Obama may begin “wiping out a few hundred people who own guns, pull a large scale Waco or a Ruby Ridge type incident” and have it “tinged it with racial overtones.” But just in case Obama goes through with his plans to “take down” the Internet, “people are setting up phone-trees all over the place” to stop Obama in his tracks.
“If Obama can take your guns away he can take your car, he can take your home, he can take your bank account, he can take your very life,” Howard said.
Unsurprisingly, Pratt agreed with their insane ramblings: “I do agree that the Obama administration would definitely be capable of something as evil as you were suggesting.”
However, Pratt warned that “a lot of people resolved, ‘no more free Wacos,’” and that if Obama “starts playing the massacre game the way you did at Waco, well, you’re going to get surrounded, you won’t be able to go home safely, your family won’t be safe.”
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/conten...acre-americans
And we all can be assured this asshole knows that Ms of racist, white, rural bubbas suck down his propaganda as Gospel truth.
You do realize you followed this post by fringe religious propaganda. right? I mean, millions buy into anti-American rhetoric when they burn flags (IE your parallel to bubbas). It's a big business in the Mid east and North Africa. I know the parallel isn't exact but there's nuts out there everywhere - making fringe red teamers look bad doesn't mean blue team is always right, which is what you imply by constantly making excuses (shilling) for Dems.
"making fringe red teamers look bad doesn't mean blue team is always right"
means that to you and other dumb s, not to me
"which is what you imply by constantly making excuses (shilling) for Dems."
The main, overwhelming advantage of the Dems is that they ARE NOT Repugs.
now GFY
The REAL reason for America's gun frenzy finally obvious. It's All About The Benjamin$$$
Firearms-makers to politicians on gun rights: You balk, we walk
Firearms companies ranging from gun shops to machinists are joining forces to oppose new gun control laws. Some are threatening to move away from states that crack down on guns, others are refusing to sell gear to police that can't be sold to citizens.
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politic...All+Stories%29
Liberty!
Freedom!
2nd Amendment!
Water the Tree!
Marans!
Sharia!
UN!
Barry's n!gg@ army gonna getcha!
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
oilco puppet from bloody redd Okie land
Coburn: Congress should ‘eliminate the recordkeeping’ on guns in the U.S.
Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) on Sunday said that Republicans would block any effort to extend background checks to include private firearms sales unless Congress agreed to “eliminate the recordkeeping” on guns in the United States.
Coburn, who is one of four senators working for a bipartisan bill to expand background checks, recently refused to comment to The Washington Post about his position on keeping records on private sales, saying that “I don’t negotiate through the press.”
But on Sunday, the Oklahoma senator drew a line in the sand.
“I don’t think we’re that close to a deal, and there absolutely will not be recordkeeping on legitimate law-abiding gun owners in this country,” Coburn insisted. “And if they want to eliminate the benefits of trying to prevent the sales to people who are actually mentally ill and the criminals, all they have to do is create a recordkeeping. And that will kill this bill.”
“So if you really want to improve it, you have to eliminate the recordkeeping and give people the right and the responsibility to do the right thing. And that’s check on the [National Instant Criminal Background Check System] NICS list to make sure you’re not selling a gun to somebody who’s in one of those two categories.”
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/02/2...e+Raw+Story%29
NRA/Repugs have already forced ATF to use only paper, not computers, for gun records. Now, it's NO RECORDS at all.
More Guns = More Gun Violence and More Gun Profits
Black Lawmaker Receives Death Threat Over Gun Bill: ‘There Will Be Blood! I’m Coming For You, N—–’
“I guarantee there is not enough law enforcement or military to stop an all-out overthrow of this government if you or that n—– president tries to take our guns,” one e-mail dated Feb. 13 reads. “Guarantee we will make World War I and II look like child’s play, many will die. Be prepared.”
Another e-mail expresses hope that someone would “Giffords” both Fields and Rep. Beth McCann, a reference to the 2011 mass shooting that nearly killed Arizona Rep. Gabby Giffords.
The paper letter attributed to Sain states, “There will be blood! I’m coming for you, n—– b—–.” . . . “Limiting magazine sizes is stupid and will not work,” he wrote on Feb. 13. “I for one have 100+ 30 round mags and 150 round drums. I will never give those up and I am far from being some whack job.”
In an email to Fields the following day, Sain wrote: “I ordered a ton of new 30 round magazines today C***bag…go f*** yourself and your new law…we won’t abide by it…C*** N*****.”
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...g-for-you-n-b/
gun fellators, just gotta luv 'em!
You are a ing idiot. Europe was able to demilitarize because we have subsidized their goddamn military.
Sincerely,
ter McGee
Also the way they were able to socialize medical care.
And I guess you ing idiots believe the Marshall Plan was purely altruistic?
highly favored NRA Dem shill gets clobbered.
Robin Kelly Rolls in Chicago Primary, Takes Aim at NRA
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/p...469,full.story
Federal Appeals Court: There Is No Second Amendment Right To A Concealed Firearm
A panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, which included a Reagan and a George W. Bush appointee, held unanimously on Friday that the Second Amendment does not protect a right to carry a concealed firearm:
[T]he er opinion notes that, “[l]ike most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited. From Blackstone through the 19th-century cases, commentators and courts routinely explained that the right was not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.” As an example of the limited nature of the Second Amendment right to keep and carry arms, the Court observed that “the majority of the 19th-century courts to consider the question held that prohibitions on carrying concealed weapons were lawful under the Second Amendment or state analogues.” And the Court stressed that “nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions.”
There can be little doubt that bans on the concealed carrying of firearms are longstanding. In er, the Supreme Court cited several early cases in support of the statement that most nineteenth century courts approved of such prohibitions. We note, however, that this view was not unanimous. Nevertheless, “[m]ost states enacted laws banning the carrying of concealed weapons” in the nineteenth century.
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...ealed-firearm/
hey, you racist, less gun fellators, this guy is talking 'bout YOU!
Illinois Republican Legislator Compares Gun Regulations To Castration
SACIA: Don’t blame the rest of us. This isn’t about Democrats, it’s not about Republicans. It’s because Chicago wants a warm fuzzy. “Let’s pass a bill that will eliminate assault rifles.” Last year, there were more people killed with hammers than with assault rifles. Here’s an analogy folks, I ask you to think of this: You folks in Chicago, want me to get castrated because you’re families are having too many kids. It spells out exactly what is happening here! You want us to get rid of guns. … You bet I used Chicago as an example, because you’re the folks that want this craziness.”
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...ns-castration/
Add this asshole to The List!
Cop humiliates Sen. Graham at gun hearing: ‘You’re wrong’ on background checks
Echoing the National Rifle Association, Graham argued before the Senate Judiciary Committee that enhanced background checks are not needed because the laws currently on the books are not enforced well enough.
“When almost 80,000 people fail a background check and 44 people or prosecuted, what kind of deterrent is that?” he asked. “I mean, the law obviously is not seeing that as important, if it’s such an important issue, why aren’t we prosecuting people who fail a background check?”
“Just for the record, from my point of view, the point of a background check…” Milwaukee police chief Edward A. Flynn began. “Senator…”
“How many cases have you made?” Graham pressed. “How many cases have…”
“You know what?” Flynn said. “It doesn’t matter. It’s a paper thing.”
“Can I ask the questions?” Graham interjected.
“I want to finish the answer,” Flynn replied.
“I want to stop 76,000 people from buying guns illegally,” he said. “That’s what a background check does. If you think we’re going to do paperwork prosecutions, you’re wrong.”
The Senate committee’s audience erupted into applause, which committee chair Sen. Dianne Feinsten (D-CA) asked to quiet down.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/02/2...e+Raw+Story%29
Idaho Lawmaker Wants To Draft All Adults Into Militias
While Rice hasn’t offered specific language for his proposed amendment, he indicated that the age and gender requirements would be dropped, making all adults eligible for service.
“Today we held a print hearing on my proposed state cons utional amendment that will eliminate age and gender discrimination from our definition of the state militia,” the lawmaker wrote in a message posted to Twitter. “This will allow the state to backstop the individual right to keep and bear arms in an effective way that is supported by the reasoning in all the U.S. Supreme Court decisions.”
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...al-government/
Last edited by boutons_deux; 02-28-2013 at 01:09 PM.
Texas school employee shot in gun safety class
At the conclusion of the CHL training on February 27, 2013, one certified person stayed for private instruction with the instructor and had a mechanical malfunction with his weapon. With the assistance of the instructor, the malfunction was addressed, but the gun misfired and the bullet ricocheted coming back to strike the VISD employee in the left leg. The VISD employee was attended to at the scene and transferred to Tyler for further treatment. The injury is not life threatening or disabling. Because of privacy and security issues we cannot make any further statement.
http://www.salon.com/2013/02/28/texa..._safety_class/
lol boutons with 6 copy pastas
lol laughingstock of the forum
lol spreading blue team propaganda at all time
lol shill
weak , zizi, ya got nothin, less, absolutely nothing
Like I said before youre a classic outer party member. You dont buy into everything but youre quick to make a hundred excuses since the opponent is soooo much more terrible. Its lame man.
It's TRUE, man.
The REPUGS ARE so much worse than the Dems.
Here's a non-copy-paste deep, original, insightful thought: GO YOURSELF, GUN FELLATOR MAN
How many are you willing to sacrifice to have cars? Swimming pools? Matches?
Lol Jr. High.
All good questions.
Since you ask, I have never much considered the answers to any of them.
I think we sacrifice far too many people on the bloody car altar, quite frankly. 30,000+ dead per year is far in excess of what I am willing to pay.
Seems to me that we could spend about as much money on trains and changing zoning to make cities dense enough for that to be a bit more economical and we could avoid the economic losses.
Assuming each one of those people had $20,000/year jobs, that is $600,000,000 in lost GDP every year... ulative. $600M this year, pluse $600M next year...
Sure we get a lot of economic activity relating to cars, but I honestly wonder if the sheer loss of human life, injuries, and trauma makes up for it.
"Assuming each one of those people had $20,000/year jobs, that is $600,000,000 in lost GDP every year"
each motorcycle accident avgs $1M+, so accidents so generate GDP in medical, etc, care.
http://blogs.findlaw.com/injured/201...ar-report.html
Last edited by boutons_deux; 05-06-2013 at 01:01 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
