Reply With Quote
Take a look at to whom the speech was given. The same rhetoric was coming from the administration before, during and after the election.
So during the election Obama wanted to discuss issues with Iran and not threatened them with millitary action. Now since jigga won the elction he has changed tune and threatened them with millitary action? wth? Negro and cracker both have no clue what they are doing. Funny they ripped Mitt for talking tough on Iran now they are doing same . I am all for the goverment doing what they have to do but I was wondering how you Obama defenders would react to this matter?
Take a look at to whom the speech was given. The same rhetoric was coming from the administration before, during and after the election.
I am talking about Obama not the president before. Stick on the subject at hand liberals. Plus Biden was talking not pussy ass Obummer.
Last edited by BobaFett1; 03-05-2013 at 06:28 AM.
Both Romney and Obama are zionist shills, only difference being Romney was a lot worse. What Netanyahu wants from the US he gets from the US, and right now he wants to the US to fight his battles for him in Iran. This isn't a red vs. blue issue at all, it's an our country is controlled by zionists issue.
You're uninformed and appear to be relatively stupid and racist as well. Have fun.
racist? I said they are dumbasses does not make me racist.......u do not know me man
YOu liberals always use the race card.
Whatever you say. You're still uninformed and appear to be relatively stupid.
Do you realize you are moving into the B_D level? I was going to comment but why? It's so much non-sense. It's the type of stuff a first year philosophy major would be saying. Or the guy in high school who wears all black and talks about how he loves to debate people and is really into politics. This is Alamo Community College level.
Th'Pusher u must be a Obummer worshipper.
I guess in your world situations never change?
I would of respect Obama more if he stayed like these during election. He never did because he wanted liberal votes. So he won he trying to act strong.
OTC Level.
Nope. Just no noticeable policy shift.
really cause biden said during election we talk before we talk action...........
You realize Biden was reinforcing the administration existing stance, right? That's why he said Obama was "not bluffing when he threatened force"...
And he maintained that position:
(Reuters) - U.S. Vice President Joe Biden insisted on Monday that President Barack Obama was not bluffing about using force to thwart Iran's nuclear ambitions if all else fails, even as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called for a "credible military threat" against Tehran.
Seeking to reassure Israel and its U.S. supporters just weeks before Obama visits the Jewish state, Biden cautioned that all options, including sanctions and diplomacy, must be exhausted to ensure that the international community will be supportive if military action is deemed necessary.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...92312720130304
read a ing article dude.
Biden should keep his ing mouth shut.
I used to think the "zionists control America" stuff was bull anti-Semitism up until a year ago (if you do some digging you'll find threads where I sang quite a different tune on Israel) but it seems obvious to me now that it's not at all. Netanyahu has more influence over America's foreign policy than any other foreign leader ever has in American history. Even after how much of a disaster the war in Iraq was, we have millions of people in this country (some of which just as liberal as I am on other issues) pining to go start another war that will cost another trillion dollars and more American lives than the war in Iraq did largely because a zionist leader on the other side of the world is telling us we need to. The fact going to war with Iran is even being seriously discussed with the shape our economy is in and with the domestic issues we have proves how much Israel controls this country.
I will say that any liberal who tries to justify any Obama administration aggression towards Iran is a hypocrite. It's a total flip flop if Obama starts showing aggression towards Iran.
Was this a troll job? Worst political debate I've seen here.
There is no debate because Obama is a appeaser. He is not gonna be tough on Iran.
Obama if he sticked with his guns I could respect him.
Idk why that's a bad thing. The sooner we stop trying to control Iran, the sooner their clerics will stop being able to use us as a way of uniting Iran behind Islamic extremism. We empower radical clerics every time we try to influence Iran. If we didn't stage a coup in the 1950s to take out a Democratically elected leader in Iran so we could replace him with an oil puppet, we wouldn't have any of these problems we have with Iran today.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
