States With Most Gun Laws Have Fewest Gun Deaths

[Th'Pusher]

It would be even safer to stuff the car with the strawmen you keep building.

What strawman? You said you wore your seatbelt voluntarily, I said who cares has pulsory seatbelt regulation been effective?

[TeyshaBlue]

Strawbags FTW!

[Drachen]

Why is it OK to infringe on the 2nd amendment but not the 1st or 4th? Thats like saying...hey...you can have two sentences of free speech, but no large capacity paragraphs...

You know that you have to get a permit to protest right? Do you also know that they have limited where you can protest? Heck, the poor westboro baptist church isn't able to protest as closely to the funerals of military soldiers as they would like, or on the days they would like.

[Th'Pusher]

Strawbags FTW!

No straw here. Read the thread CC said he was fine with eliminating seatbelt regulation.

[CosmicCowboy]

No straw here. Read the thread CC said he was fine with eliminating seatbelt regulation.

LOL, you are such a joke little anklebiter.

[Th'Pusher]

LOL, you are such a joke little anklebiter.

I think "suits the outta me" was your exact response when bd, of all people, logically dismantled your redneck ass.

[CosmicCowboy]

First BD did no such thing. I don't care if there is a law requiring seat belt use because smart people wear their seat belt anyway. the stupid people that want to get ejected out the windshield. Let them die.

Second the topic was laws outlawing certain guns and magazines and you were madly building strawmen about seatbelts and airbags.

off, loser.

[TeyshaBlue]

.....bd of all people logically dismantled your redneck ass.

[boutons_deux]

First BD did no such thing. I don't care if there is a law requiring seat belt use because smart people wear their seat belt anyway. the stupid people that want to get ejected out the windshield. Let them die.

Second the topic was laws outlawing certain guns and magazines and you were madly building strawmen about seatbelts and airbags.

off, loser.

it was YOUR analogy with car regulations that I trashed.

[CosmicCowboy]

it was YOUR analogy with car regulations that I trashed.

The only thing you have trashed today is your racing striped jockey shorts.

[boutons_deux]

The only thing you have trashed today is your racing striped jockey shorts.

to quote that joker TB , that's your typical COWARD non-response.

[CosmicCowboy]

it was YOUR analogy with car regulations that I trashed.

And Seat belts are pulsory to minimize fatalities in car accidents. Seatbelt regulation has been highly effective.

mandatory seat belts, and all kinds of safety features have been designed into cars in the last 35+ years have reduced car deaths.

the alcohol industry, always seeking profits at all costs, has very effectively limited the state penalties for DWI, as well has blocking any attempts to lower the legal limit beyond the ridiculously high 0.08. Countries not ruled by their alcohol industries use 0.05.

It was you and the little pekinese comparing car safety laws to gun laws.

[Th'Pusher]

The only thing you have trashed today is your racing striped jockey shorts.

Actually no, your bull has been dismantled. As much as bags like you want to deny it, regulation can work.

[CosmicCowboy]

My analogy was that accidents happen. That's why they are called accidents. I'm sure someone was electrocuted somewhere today too. Do you want to pass laws limiting electrical services to 24V?

[CosmicCowboy]

Actually no, your bull has been dismantled. As much as bags like you want to deny it, regulation can work.

not hardly BTW does my sock fuzz taste good, anklebiter?

[CosmicCowboy]

Strawbags FTW!

[TeyshaBlue]

to quote that joker TB , that's your typical COWARD non-response.

I really left a mark, eh?

[Wild Cobra]

And if you really want to use a car regulation analogy the proposed gun regulations would be more like outlawing cars with more than 150hp.

I'd have to split my WS6 in half, and that still wouldn't be enough...

[CosmicCowboy]

I'd have to split my WS6 in half, and that still wouldn't be enough...

Yeah, I'm crankin 375 in my truck. I may not use em but I want em if I need em.

[rjv]

My analogy was that accidents happen. That's why they are called accidents. I'm sure someone was electrocuted somewhere today too. Do you want to pass laws limiting electrical services to 24V?

if a root cause analysis indicated that the extent of the voltage was statistically likely to create more incidents, yes. because it would not be a purely random event.

would such an analysis of assault weapons be feasible? perhaps-but it would have to leave out subjective assertions which would be difficult.

[TeyshaBlue]

if a root cause analysis indicated that the extent of the voltage was statistically likely to create more incidents, yes. because it would not be a purely random event.

would such an analysis of assault weapons be feasible? perhaps-but it would have to leave out subjective assertions which would be difficult.

Ummm that analysis has been complete for about, I dunno, maybe 125 years.

Also, enjoy baking your cake for 13 hours with your 24V oven.

[Wild Cobra]

Assault weapons bans make no sense at all. Not I have ever seen proposed makes any sense. One of the biggest things politicians do that is bad if with how society already operates and is comfortable with. Sometimes it is necessary, but it always causes blow back. I see no reason why banning what is already legal in weapons, has any net positive effect for the general welfare.

[TeyshaBlue]

translation? Anybody?

[rjv]

Ummm that analysis has been complete for about, I dunno, maybe 125 years.

Also, enjoy baking your cake for 13 hours with your 24V oven.

exactly. accidents occurring under such cir stances would point to another variable. there would be no uncertainty regarding the absolute random nature of the accident. but not all car accidents would belong to such a set (purely random events). some may occur as a result of a root cause (e.g., texting) that at some point could become regulated.

the question is: can such a determination be made about incidents involving assault weapons?

[rjv]

translation? Anybody?

it it ain't broke don't fix it.