But 40K could get you a nice CTS -- TODAY. I can only imagine the rebadged Volt will be 60K or so. Good grief.
That's on every "10 worst cars of all time" list I've ever read.![]()
But 40K could get you a nice CTS -- TODAY. I can only imagine the rebadged Volt will be 60K or so. Good grief.
You're missing the point again. CTS <> Electric/Hybrid. Emerging tech is always higher. Early adopters buy not so much for the immediate benefits, but to extend the developmental process as well.
True, but I'm assuming hybrids were slow out the gate to be adopted as well. (I could be wrong on that.)
Electric cars are promoted as the chic harbinger of an environmentally benign future. Ads assure us of "zero emissions," and President Obama has promised a million on the road by 2015.
so advertisers stretch the truth? lol
so..... is anyone making you buy one?
I was just pointing out that a high end vehicle like a CTS can be had for the same price as Chevy Volt.
As for your last point, I've always thought people were early adopters because the emerging tech was too cool to pass up. Can you think of another example when the sales of an emerging tech were so tepid?
The cool factor is probaly a player but, you're predicating this conclusion on a false premise....as if this tech development it must take place in a vacuum. Think of the economy. Think of the price of the tech. Think of your descriptor, "tepid".
Are they truly tepid considering the other factors at play? Can you contrast to a similar tech at a similar price point that is positionally redundant (after all, we already have cars that run)? If you can do that, perhaps you can use the term, "tepid".
car mfrs need to get out of the "fuel (battery) business" just like they don't sell gasoline/diesel.
If battery modules were standardized and normalized, then you get get your "fuel" anywhere, even swapping out a discharged batter for a charged battery, rather than waiting hours to recharge.
electric cars business is still VERY PRIMITIVE, like gas cars were in the 1910s.
No, I can't.
Neither can I...which is why I wouldn't characterize sales as "tepid" since that's a fairly relative term.
LOL, I bought one of those.... In 2005. Trust me when I say I am not being sarcastic by saying that this was the best 300 dollars I ever spent, and I can say that I used to drive a caddy. LOL
Then there is this awesome fact that i wear like a badge of honor.
I do 95% of my commuting on a train and bike combo. Both are more efficient and allow me to do work I would otherwise be unable to do while driving. When I do drive, its in a 2000 civic that gets nearly 40 miles to the gallon. It doesn't make sense for me to buy a new car until that one is done but I will likely look at an EV then. It may not make sense then either depending on my commute options.
I don't really give much thought to what the car looks like. I grew out of that when I was 24. If I was as feeble minded as you I might care, though.
Buck up or stay in the truck!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)