Reply With Quote
No, I don't bug those that know the game. Usually have decent discussions with them.
You're way too re ed to have a decent discussion with. It's why people on you day after day after day.
Look at your game little man, ya don't know and bug those who do. What a waste.
No, I don't bug those that know the game. Usually have decent discussions with them.
You're way too re ed to have a decent discussion with. It's why people on you day after day after day.
Where do you do anything but..DUH!!!..? You don't know .
The ones who mess with me also mess with everyone else. It's what they do.
Here ya are slick, doing what you do.
Because I don't think it takes a semi auto to defend your home. You're not very bright. You don't have to apologize for being wrong. Since you cry about others not admitting when they're wrong, you just need to acknowledge your own wrongness to avoid being a hypocrite. and I'm not a...
see more
Want more?
Last edited by Avante; 03-26-2013 at 04:57 PM.
after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day after day
I agree 100%, why I even bother with a dummy like you...???
The reality of the situation is that the 49ers didn't make it to the Super Bowl last year, and lost this year. Suck it up.
Kids ignore the why behind things. Those who know the game always take the ..how/why..into consideration. A boxer breaks his hand in a fight, a tennis player pulls a hammy, so both lose. Do we ignore the facts?
Ted Ginn doesn't get hurt the Niners beat the Giants in 2011. An obvious pass interference gets called the Niners are SB champs. I go with the facts.
By the definition of the words, those aren't facts; those are contingencies.
The facts are only what happened independent of contingencies.
Actually, no. Those aren't even contingencies. A contingency is something like, "If Kaep throws the ball in bounds, then the ball's catchable." What you said above are false extensions.
Who knows what would have happened if Ginn had been in the game. It's not like he's a very clutch player. He's dropped balls himself.
And if Kaep finds a way to get that ball in bounds so a PI call would have been possible, then who's to say Flacco can't get the Ravens in position to win the game with 1:42 on the clock and two timeouts. Or that Jones wouldn't return another kickoff for a touchdown?
Then there's common sense. Will Lebron James score in tonights game if he plays? Do we know for sure that old sun will show up tomorrow? Why neither of those have happened yet......
We saw an obvious pass interference win a game for the Ravens, that is a fact.
You agree 100% that people on you again and again and again because you're re ed?
Finally we agree on something.
Lebron James scoring if he plays is also a false extension. The consequent is not necessary follow from the antecedent. A true contingency is, "Lebron James will score tonight if he makes a field-goal or free throw." Also, it's not a fact that the sun will rise tomorrow. A prediction by definition is never a fact.
That the Ravens won on "an obvious pass interference" penalty. Isn't a fact; it isn't even a contingency. The only thing that is necessarily true is that the 49ers would have had the ball at the one-yard line had that penalty been (falsely) called. Seeing as the 49ers couldn't score from the five, there's no guarantee at all they would have scored from the one. Even if they had there's nothing to say they would have gotten the two-point conversion needed to prevent the Ravens from just getting into field-goal range. And if both of those things happened, there's nothing to be said Flacco couldn't throw another hail mary pass to Jones or than Jones couldn't take the kick back for a score. Or if the Ravens only tied with a field goal, there's nothing to say the 49ers would have won in overtime.
That's why your statement is wrong; it literally has nothing factual in it. If you want to say, "If everything had gone San Francisco's way, then they would have stood a good chance of winning," I'd understand. But that wouldn't be stating facts; that'd be whining.
Dude, re ed is a little like you who follows others around to pester them. Why not learn something about football instead, I'll help ya all I can.
Ok then I guatantee, GUARANTEE that the sun will come out tomorrow and that James will score in every game he ever plays if he doesn't get hurt early on. You wanna disagree about those?
The bottom line is very obvious, the Ravens got a gift, we all saw it,
Nope, the Niners got the biggest gift in Super Bowl history (the power outage) and still lost....
If the sun fails to come up tomorrow, then we'll all be dead, so you wouldn't have to worry about being wrong. From what I gather on this forum, that's the type of bet you like to make.
With James, you don't get to add extra contingencies into your "facts." That's not how facts work.
I don't think it's too obvious. There've been plenty of legitimate explanations about why there was no call on that play. Kaep could have forced a call with a better pass, but Ellerbe didn't let him get a good throw off.The bottom line is very obvious, the Ravens got a gift, we all saw it,
You'd have a much better case if you were arguing about the play before that one (if you even still remember it). That was a helmet-to-helmet hit.
Don't watch much football do you? How many times do we hear..."a tale of two halfs"...well? We see teams get smacked around in the first half then here they come in the second all the time. You do know that, right? Remember Seattle vs Atlanta?
Both teams had to deal with that situation, right?
Dude, why fight it so hard? The obvious OBVIOUS penalty gets called....Niners win!!!!! Only a dummy wouldn't see that.
Wow!
Dude, obvious pass interference, ref makes the call the Niners win. All that other means nothing. We all saw the play, the guy was all over Crabtree, call the penalty!!!!!!! Niners at the one. Now it's Gore, Gore, Gore...
But the second half had already started when the power went out and the Niners had just given up an 108-yard kick return to make the score 28-6, you dumb ....
Yes, but the downtime CLEARLY works against the team that has the momentum....Both teams had to deal with that situation, right?
If the city of New Orleans pays their electrical bill, the Niners get blown out, you senile old ....Dude, why fight it so hard? The obvious OBVIOUS penalty gets called....Niners win!!!!! Only a dummy wouldn't see that.
Why fight it so hard? The Ravens are defending champs, just accept it and move on...
Yes, because for some reason, being at the five is so different than being at the one. And there was no way Flacco was going to be able to come back with two timeouts and only needing a field goal to tie or win.
My issues with your point are two-fold: One, you use the word "fact" when you don't actually mean it. You're not the only person who does this, though, so I am only really pointing that out so you'll know for later; two, you can't pretend like the officials should make one call when they ignored others throughout the game. If they had called that game tightly, the Ravens are probably up by nine at that point, and the game would have been over. If they had called a perfect game, then the 49ers are down by 12 and are really out of it.
Your whole point is that if the 49ers would have gotten all the calls, they would probably have won. That's true, but the same can be said for the Falcons, the Ravens last season, and so on. What is a fact is that the Ravens won despite some calls going against them, and with the help of some calls going for them. That's not unfair to any team; that's just the way it is.
I almost feel sorry for you, nobody should be that stupid.
Who scored the most points in the second half ya ing idiot?
We have no way of knowing who does what if there is no power failure, stupid to think we do.
Dude, you can't latch on to receivers, it's against the rules....honest! That call is made the Niners win. , there was also that helmet to helmet hit that also got ignored. Come on if either of those calls are made the Niners win.
Done with your dumb ass on this, too stupid to deal with.
Re ed fat ol' serving up whiny bull .
Perrrrrr par.
Stupid idiot totally ignoring the realities of the situation as usual.
Dude, pity is starting to set in. You're soooo obviously ed up.
The Niners scored most of their points AFTER the power outage.... the downtime provided by the outage CLEARLY sapped the Ravens' momentum and helped the Niners get a second wind and get back into the game, I don't see how you can argue against that....
And we have no way of knowing what happens if the refs make that ticky-tack PI call at the end, yet you seem to think you do....We have no way of knowing who does what if there is no power failure, stupid to think we do.
Dude, you can't late hit other players out of bounds, it's against the rules, but the Niners got away with that one..... , there was also that bull roughing the passer call on Ngata.... if that first call is made and that second call isn't, Ravens still win....Dude, you can't latch on to receivers, it's against the rules....honest! That call is made the Niners win. , there was also that helmet to helmet hit that also got ignored. Come on if either of those calls are made the Niners win.
If Akers doesn't flop on his missed field goal and get a second chance, the Ravens win by even more....
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
