Reply With Quote
& he's a pile of .
http://www.nba.com/pacers/news/grang...regular-season
He looked terrible when he came back, and the Pacers weren't going anywhere anyways, but 2 knee surgeries before age 30 is never good.
& he's a pile of .
Heat got the east 4 sho
Paul George is already better than Granger anyway and definitely has a higher ceiling. Makes no difference anyway. Indy is an Eastern Conference Finals team tops.
^& George is a pile of in his own right.
Why would you say that Cubs?
He's soft & gun-shy. He'll make ya sorry. You can see it a mile away. They're wasting their time.
Yeah you're right. He doesn't realize how good he is yet.
good news for us tbh. pacers have always been a tough matchup for us, not saying we couldn't beat them but the pacers w/o granger would be much easier to overcome.
^ Even with Granger, the Heat would have had no problem taking them out.
Good for the Pacers tbh, they were playing better without him
It is always better to have a good player around. Granger cant stay healthy for Pacers to benefit from it.
Granger > Lance Stephenson, no?
Still a big loss. His outside shooting always made him better fit in a beta role anyway. Would have thrived next to today's paul george
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
