Reply With Quote
Care to offer actual evidence?
You constantly post videos, can't you at least give a time index so we don';t have to waste even more time?
You assholes are so trigger happy to call Chemtrail believers tin foil hat conspiracy theorists.
Well it's a fact they admitted already they spray the sky with chemicles so man up and say you was wrong.
Care to offer actual evidence?
You constantly post videos, can't you at least give a time index so we don';t have to waste even more time?
OMG an hour long youtube video!!! Holy , I was wrong!!!
I mean if it is on an hour long youtube video it must be true.
How can I argue with that? It doesn't get more iron-clad. Can't you see people?!?!?! Wake up sheeple, and everybody watch the hour long video!!
WOE IS ME...
I'm sure Mouse has that must time to lose, but I sure don't.
OMG an hour long youtube video!!! Holy , I was wrong!!!
One more time mouse...
Time index please...
Do conspiracy theorists even watch all these ridiculously long YouTube videos they post?
I wonder that myself. Do they really have that much time to waste?
they do. it's called crop dusting.
Well, we know where are at least one of the idiots saying chemtrails do exist is...
you guys, chemtrails are as real as gianna michaels s just look in the sky dumb s
Why do any of you still even respond? You know it's a troll. NO one who believes the he espouses has 300+ troll names. Still, you bite every time.
who seriously HASN'T seen chemtrails? they've been around for 20 years..plane exhaust doesn't linger for hours at a time.
How many hours did you spend looking at them?
And why wouldn't they linger for hours? Give me your scientific explanation.
because exhaust dissipates faster than that
According to whom?
Contrails are mainly ice and water vapor, which isn't too far from the composition of clouds. Depending on the conditions, clouds can remain without dissipating for hours -- so why can't contrails?
It has been known since the early days of aircraft travel that contrails can persist given the right conditions. Here's a report from 1942 that talks about it. http://naca.central.cranfield.ac.uk/...a-wr-l-474.pdf Some photos and mentions in newspapers about spreading and persisting contrails dating back to the 40's here http://contrailscience.com/persistin...ing-contrails/ Since air traffic has grown greatly in the last few decades and newer aircraft have bigger, more powerful engines pushing out more exhaust with much higher water content bigger contrails are to be expected. They also fly higher on average now which increases the chances for contrail formation.
I can tell you -- they aren't spraying anything.
Coming from a person ( not sure no one has met you in person) that thinks WTC7 came crashing down from a small office fire is even more proof Chemtrails are not only real you slept with your window open at night breathing it in.
Tell me what you think chemtrails are in your own words and why they aren't just ice and water vapor.
Chemtrails - Barium, Aluminum,
anium CONFIRMED In Rainwater
http://rense.com/general21/conf.htm
http://www.thomhartmann.com/forum/20...num-and-barium
Florida Rainwater Sample Tests Positive for Aluminum and Barium
Lab Reports
A lined pond (guzzler) near Redding has about 375,000 ug/l of aluminum. We are concerned that deer and wildlife drink this water. USFS ignored this.
Sugar Pine Canyon Cr. Redding, CA has 4,600,000 ppb of aluminum (normal soil 15,000 ppb) in upper and lower stream. Fish losing scales, sick looking.
Sisson meadow pond water in Mt Shasta has 12,000 mg/kg of aluminum, and the pond is fed by city spring water, but exposed to the sky (sample taken at outlet).
Shastice park (in Mt. Shasta City) stream water has 1540 ug/l of aluminum. Other streams have more, certainly bad for aquatic insects if permanent.
National Weather Service plastic rain gage on a 7’ pole in Mt. Shasta shows 100-1010 ug/l aluminum, with highest amounts after heaviest contrails; it correlates.
With no contrails, we get 0-50 ug/l aluminum in the rain. Several stations report no aluminum, but very high barium or strontium, maybe a anate for reflectivity.
Snowdrift near McCloud on Mt Shasta at 8000’ has 61,100 ug/l aluminum, 83 of barium, and 383 of strontium. This is over 4-5 times that of plain protected soil.
Lab reports during storms range 0 to 30 ug/l in rain with no spraying to 4000 ug/l of aluminum (series), always correlated positively to jet spraying (national info).
Many samples were taken by a trained USDA biologist with legal water sampling experience and MS degree in related subjects. His samples are similar to others.
Samples show a direct relationship to contrail density: More contrails, higher Aluminum, Barium, and/or strontium in water; also boron and arsenic appear.
When we get zero readings of any element, it proves our samples are not self-contaminated by dirt, dust, dirty fingers. We should never get zero if they were.
The Mt. Shasta city public water report in 2010 indicates that aluminum, barium, lead, mercury, cadmium, chromium, and strontium are not found in city water yet.
Contamination is unlikely because jars used are clean glass or official sampling bottles washed with known pure tap water. Results follow contrail density.
Outside soils in Mt. Shasta area in 2007 have over 1.6 % or 16,000 mg/kg of aluminum. Soil is 13000 mg/kg in aluminum under my house, likely natural.
Strontium, barium, and aluminum are found in Mt. Shasta rocks in a few ppb. “Dust” does not explain high amounts in the rain or snow, nor occasionally zero.
Rain samples from Arizona, New York, California, Colorado, Wyoming, Idaho, Pennsylvania, show high Al, Ba, Sr, As, B, Fe, and Mn, but any may be zero.
We think iron/manganese may be meteor dust, and lead is from civil aircraft gas.
Although local geologic minerals vary, we usually get Welsbach patent patterns. Some have no aluminum, but high Sr or Ba, or none so formulas likely differ.
Radioactivity was tested with a local Geiger counter, with no indications.
Some readings may be the result of local polluting industries. However, results are nationally correlated to jet spraying, about 90% with no local factory source.
Redding CA city official Mull says EPA Redding Basic Labs are incompetent.
With different weather, the samples change, so maybe spray formulas do too.
Fibers that appear instead of dust have Welsbach elements, they are a spray error.
http://globalskywatch.com/reference/...ervations.html
http://www.thc-ministry.org/forum/sh...ad.php?p=16789
Chemtrails are real and they are damaging our health
http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/...-they-are.html
ELECTROLYSIS & BARIUM
http://www.carnicom.com/precip1.htm
Protecting Yourself From Chemtrails
http://healthmaven.blogspot.com/2012...hemtrails.html
Proof of chemtrails
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
