Reply With Quote
They'll oogle while giving her fifty lashes for her debauchery.
as designed. this was counted on.
of course not, but the pictures are always appreciated
you got the message in spite of your bad self. so did I.
and whoever forgets the message may still remember the pictures.
They'll oogle while giving her fifty lashes for her debauchery.
what irony? the ties don't belong to the men.
deliberately using ties to magnify the political message? seems kinda manipulative; is certainly effective.
otoh, they're just ties -- what's the big deal?
I love ties as much as the next guy. And the point I'm making isn't a big deal. But the sense I'm getting is that the dudes here (and in Europe too) are more caught up with the ties then the message because, well, they're ties.
They're attention s trying to make a political message. The medium they're using drowns out the message.
Clearly, these s are concerned with the plight of muslim women and not showing their s at any chance they get to protest the cause celebre in vogue that day ...
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...k_EURO2012.jpg
Last edited by Deuce; 04-05-2013 at 12:59 PM.
prediction?
maybe. remains to be seen.
But I guess we're ok with white people running around saying the Islamists (whatever Islamist means) so long as they got ties, amirite?
s?
implies a cash nexus. but clearly, that's one way to get an interview.
well, of the attention variety at least
I'm ok with people saying whatever they want. this is an unmoderated forum.
That's a convenient response
you're magnifying it. you just posted ties linked to political activism.
also, true
Thinking that I can persuade most people that these es are attention s is a losing battle. I don't think I'm magnifying anything in that regard.
probably not, tbhThinking that I can persuade most people that these es are attention s is a losing battle.
being an attention is incidental to being correct or incorrect, correct?
I dunno. But, why's that matter?
I can't speak to generalities. If you wanna re-ask your question as applied here, go for it ...
so, so what if they're attention s, and that's even better: they're willing to risk their reputations for a cause.
what's your take on the cause?
why does it matter so much that you called them s unconditionally in a public forum?
sure, you walked it back like a good boy . . .
Well, I have two general problems:
1. I think that these s are more concerned with flashing their s for attention than the underlying issue at cause;
2. I think their message is highly inconsistent; as a group opposed to (gender) hierarchies ("FEMEN - is the name of the scandal famous organization of topless women activists, who defend with their breast sexual and social equality in the world;" from their website), I wonder why they adopt a borderline neo-conservative message ( the Islamists, your Morals). They've adopted a colonizing at ude towards the culture and religion of the orient (let's flash our ties so they change; or, we don't care if they change, let's just flash our ties which only reinforces #1). It shows a severe lack of thought for a group ostensibly concerned with equality to take such a position.
It gets international attention, which is exactly their point.
Religions, all of them, makes you stupid and full of hate and vengeance.
And ALL RELIGIONS have always been men's hustle to oppress women as secondary humans.
Because they're s and this is discourse.
Why does it matter so much for you to ask me why I call them s, in a public forum?
Who knew you were so religious?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions