1. people who never heard of Amina will ask why they are flashing their s.
2. they DO CARE about change, that's why they flash.
neo-conservative is " the Islamists, your Morals" ?
goddam, you right-wingers are consistently stupid s.
Since " s" dictates a profit relationship, it's not an accurate descriptor for what they are trying to accomplish.
1. people who never heard of Amina will ask why they are flashing their s.
2. they DO CARE about change, that's why they flash.
neo-conservative is " the Islamists, your Morals" ?
goddam, you right-wingers are consistently stupid s.
Fair enough
it doesn't. thanks for the clarification.
presumably that includes Amina Tyler, no?
(just curious who all you're calling a hooker)
I'm inclined to say no because she's situated in a very different place viz. FEMEN
fair enough. can you elaborate?
I'm not calling anyone a hooker - just attention s.
She's a Tunisian woman who lives in a different society/culture. Her experiences are different. Because she is an "insider" (for lack of a better term, her message as spoken by her has a different resonance compared to ugly fat es running amok in Kiev.
But at the end of the day, I'm inclined to think AT is an AW too
your delicacy will be duly noted by the insurgent matriarchy.I'm not calling anyone a hooker - just attention s.
If/When that happens, I know I'll be the first against the wall ...
fwiw, I'd have little to no problems with the FEMEN protests if they were honest about their unexpressed colonial at udes
all in the same ditch at the end of the day?
good work!
the royalty check from the secret patriarchy government is on the way!
thanks for doing your part to uphold the double standard for all brothers oppressed by unruly, heathenish crones
(in b4 points @ ties)
A little bit of histrionics helps the medicine go down WH
who says " the Islamists" and what does that have to do with this thread
the hand waving about ties and s wasn't all me.
so then would it be fair to say, "fat ugly es running amok in Kiev" = " s?"
Because calling someone an attention is tantamount to decrying oppression by crones and/or being a sleeper agent for the patriarchy ...
orly? tantamount how?calling someone an attention is tantamount to decrying oppression by crones and/or being a sleeper agent for the patriarchy ..
I see the ability to sense sarcasm is weak in this one
sleeper agent of the patriarchy?: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19260550
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)