What numbers? The ones that include rebounding or is strongly influenced by teammates ?
Are you saying that cool graphic isnt true?
I'm saying it's outdated if it is true. It also is strongly influenced by teammates.What numbers? The ones that include rebounding or is strongly influenced by teammates ?
Are you saying that cool graphic isnt true?
You still haven't provided Diaw's nifty little chart.
Its outdated by about a month and a half. You think Lee became a better defender during that span? I dont have to provide Diaws cool graphic either because even if Diaw sucked hes not the worst, Lee is.
It's outdated because the numbers say Lee doesn't give up 60% shooting.Its outdated by about a month and a half. You think Lee became a better defender during that span? I dont have to provide Diaws cool graphic either because even if Diaw sucked hes not the worst, Lee is.
Why not provide Diaw's graph, you seem really confident it'll prove you right.
What numbers ?
Why would I need to provide a graph to show Diaw is better than the worst? You look for it if you think it will prove Lee isnt the worst tbh.
http://www.sloansportsconference.com...0the%20NBA.pdf
Lee is the worst of the players on the list. Diaw isn't even on the list so there's really no way of telling
Actually the ONE list in that report Diaw made, he was ranked lower than Lee
Yeah, look at what column is decreasing. Out of all the shots Diaw faced (make or miss) he faced a smaller percentage than David Lee did from within 5 feet. That must mean Lee is a better defender or atleast not any worse than Diaw!!
Figure 3: Opponents' field goal percentages vary widely depending on which interior defender is close to the basket. Milwaukee's Larry
Sanders is one of the most effective interior defenders in the league; opponents struggle to score when he is near the basket. This is not the
case with Golden State’s David Lee; when he is close to the basket, opponents score at very high efficiencies.
That is from that figure. Those appendixes you looked at serve a purpose but not the one youre looking for, try again amigo.
Table 1: The top and bottom 5 interior defenders according to proximal FG%, which is defined as the opponent’s FG% when the
qualifying defender is within 5 feet of the shot attempt
That is from another table were Lee comes in 3rd to last.
Read the limitations section, there is no exclusion of any player when coming up with the numbers for the figure and table. The appendixes simply break down what kind of shots are being defended and the percentages...the 'list were Diaw was lower' that you saw was just an expanded list. But it actually proves Diaw was included in the study (figure and table) since they have a record of the shots he faced. Way to make yourself look like a fool dumbass .
Last edited by FkLA; 04-09-2013 at 03:31 AM.
Nope, I still think that:
Boris Diaw must be a mav krew nuthugger tbhhe's playing like ass just to make Fkla look bad
Where you at you re ed Jew. You too much of a got to take your L like a man ?
Would this Warriors team be better off with Diaw instead of Lee?
I mean, if Warriors fans think that they are better with nobody instead of Lee, I think Diaw could top that.
http://forums.realgm.com/boards/view...454743656ac015
They are all asking to trade Lee for a stretch 4, I wonder if Diaw could fit that role.
is someone ready to apologise?
diaw is only good if he fkn shoots the ball instead of beinga passive on offense
last night bogut didnt even bother to cover him or anyone on the switch that was hovering around the perimeter, he doesnt run out or do anything besides dare the player to shoot, parker and diaw took their chances and live with it...
Laughing at people that put this got on a pedestal tbh. He may be better than a fat, lazy, passive Diaw but that isnt really saying much.
How I wish David "the ultimate cancer" Lee was playing this series, tbh.
No way, Lee is way better. Hes a 20-10 machine, Bogut cant even hit a damn FT and I dont even know who the Draymond Green is.
So then you were still wrong
Yeah, it makes perfect sense to assume that was the point of my point.
Yeah, it makes perfect sense to assume that was the point of my point.
Sure. You didnt compare it to Melo-RJ homerish takes or anything like that.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
