I just seems that if generation X & Y were taxed more & worked until they were maybe 70 to prop up social security there would not be any problem…
More disturbing are the numbers that reflect boomers’ woeful undersaving for retirement as the economy struggles to gain its footing in a low-yield environment, as pointed out in a report published in December by asset management firm Manning & Napier, “Potential Macroeconomic Consequences of an Aging Population With Insufficient Savings.”
“Data provided by the Employee Benefit Research Ins ute shows that, excluding long-term care, a 65-year-old couple in 2012 (with median drug expenses) would need approximately $163,000 to have a 50% chance of meeting their medical expenses throughout retirement, and approximately $283,000 to have a 90% chance.
A stunning 60% of workers have less than $25,000 in savings and investments, excluding their primary home and defined benefit plans, and 30% had under $1,000 in savings and investments,” says the Manning & Napier report.
http://www.advisorone.com/2013/01/17...ent-disaster-l