Yeah, it's totally unrealistic to think you can win a championship every year, and that mentality has led the Lakers into some rash signings and waiving of players over the past few years. I don't care what Artest did in '10, Ariza had just as an impressive of an outing the year prior, is 6 years younger, and matches up better in this new era of quick, long, athletic small forwards. If I remember, the Lakers didn't want to give him 33 million, which is what they wound up paying Artest anyway. His '09 campaign should've earned him a future with the Lakers, but a bigger "name" was available, and in time honored Lakers fashion, they preferred the name player. I always felt Ariza was just a perfect fit, from a roster and chemistry standpoint. Artest has been a trainwreck for the Lakers since that big 3 he hit in Game 7 of the Finals.
I don't recall the details, but I thought letting go Farmar go was a big mistake. A young, quick PG who was part of two championship teams let go in favor of signing Steve Blake for the same amount of money. Even in '10, the Lakers had trouble with quick PGs, so they respond by signing an older and slower one as a backup to the slowest one in the league? And it showed when Chris Paul went off in round 1 that year and when Jason Terry torched the Lakers.
Never developing Devin Ebanks and instead signing John McRoberts and Troy Murphy, burying him at the 3rd/4th string. Versatile 6'9" SFs don't come around too often and I think the Lakers should've given him a shot.
The Nash signing was a massive mistake. As Lakerfans were ejaculating here after the signing, I warned them to be prepared for Steve Blake playing 25 minutes a game and seeing Nash in a suit quite often. Sessions would've been a much better fit. Lakers are in desperate need of penetration, and he can get into the lane at will. Also great at drawing fouls.
The time is now for the Lakers FO to be patient and develop something for the future instead of trying "roll the dice" on high profile FAs. You'll never develop team chemistry with that kind of revolving door policy.