Spurs got the easiest path, imho.

[look_at_g_shred]

No don't give me that "if they were healthy" excuse. It's the Lakers management's fault their not healthy. Mitch thought it would be a good idea to get a old hobbled Nash and hobbled Howard waste all the money on old stars and not incorporate a bench with young talent. And to top it off Jimmy boy and Mitch thought it would be a good idea to hire Mike _'Antoni who is notorious for overplaying his starters and running them into the ground. lol that's a damn good job the best front office in the league did.

Chris Paul? lol and lol to getting Steve Nash in his prime..

[rascal]

rascal's definitely not a Spurs fan. Back when the team was winning les he ed about how boring they were and how he liked running teams better. Then when the Spurs became a running team he ed about them not playing inside.

The Spurs have never been a running team under pop.

[100%duncan]

^ gity

[rascal]

the lakers won't win more les than Spurs in next 10 years unless they get Lebron or Durant. Stop smokin the crack. It just doesn't add up, KObe is finished, Howard can never lead a team, they still gotta pay Nash, Metta and even if they amnesty Gasol, that wont' be enough to sign a superstar.

sorry but again, that bull that LA will get more championship than Spurs in next 10 years is nothing but pulled out of your ass bull .

come up with a realistic scenario and then we can start talking, otherwise STFU

You must have your eyes closed to the Lakers history. The lakers will have no problem regrouping and will be a contender in no time. The spurs will need another franchise all time great lucky lottery ball bounce pick.

[rascal]

^ gity

Grow up

[rascal]

the lakers won't win more les than Spurs in next 10 years unless they get Lebron or Durant. Stop smokin the crack. It just doesn't add up, KObe is finished, Howard can never lead a team, they still gotta pay Nash, Metta and even if they amnesty Gasol, that wont' be enough to sign a superstar.

sorry but again, that bull that LA will get more championship than Spurs in next 10 years is nothing but pulled out of your ass bull .

come up with a realistic scenario and then we can start talking, otherwise STFU

The Lakers will win more les than the Spurs over the next 10 years. Like it or not.

[rascal]

rascal where you at got?

Grow up. That is 8th grade trash talk.

[100%duncan]

[hater]

You must have your eyes closed to the Lakers history. The lakers will have no problem regrouping and will be a contender in no time. The spurs will need another franchise all time great lucky lottery ball bounce pick.

I figured you didn't have any realistic scenarios

chances of spurs getting another 1st round pick >>>> lakers chances of landing another Magic, or Kobe/Shaq/Gasol/Jackson combination

if I was a betting man, I'd say Spurs have better chance at success over lakers in next 10 years

[james evans]

there is no easy path against the thunder when durant can get fouls for someone looking at him and every time fisher hits the floor, even when he's on the bench, he gets an offensive foul call. it's damn near impossible to stop a team with the slightest bit of contact the whistle blows. we saw that last year

[DAF86]

there is no easy path against the thunder when durant can get fouls for someone looking at him and every time fisher hits the floor, even when he's on the bench, he gets an offensive foul call. it's damn near impossible to stop a team with the slightest bit of contact the whistle blows. we saw that last year

Well, I was talking about the Western Conference only. Of course the Heat have the easiest path with the East conference being a ing joke and all that.

[DAF86]

Did you just watch that abortion?

[spurraider21]

If Houston gets a couple of upsets the spurs path to the finals would include beating the 6, 7, and 8 seed

[DAF86]

That was pretty damn easy, tbh.