Reply With Quote
Dude, dude, dude...wow!
Talking about a ...known....gay president, ok?
The obvious totally s you over doesn't it?
Can we go over the part where "we" know that Baylor didn't know she was gay when they recruited her again? Because I'm not sure we know that.
Dude, dude, dude...wow!
Talking about a ...known....gay president, ok?
The obvious totally s you over doesn't it?
Abolitionists were rare at one time as well.
Civil rights activists were rare at one time as well.
You would have been the guy arguing against Jackie Robinson's playing in the majors. Those guys had power at one time.
Enought to know nobody around here wants to see two guys walking down the street hand in hand. And enought to know if one of our rookie drafties had of kissed his boyfriend on national TV we;'d be talking about that instead of this.
Yes, it's obvious you move the goalposts every time you lose an argument.
Knowing what I know about the black athlete and you say that stupid ? I'd be looking to weed the white player out, give me that speed.
Can't believe you said that.
Why would you be talking about it?
We know Baylor has not condemned her.
We also know that Baylor will continue to honor her.
We know Baylor has not condemned her.
We also know that Baylor will continue to honor her.
Come on man, don't play stupid-er. Did you honestly think anyone was talking about a gay in hiding, come on dude, sheesh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Of course you would act that way -- your reasons for excluding gays had nothing to do with actual performance at all -- those were the same arguments used against blacks in the day.
It's not my fault your arguments are pretty stupid at the core.
We'd all be talking about. The media would have ran with it. You really don't know this?
Since there have been at least two gay NBA players who played a combined 17 seasons without incident, that negates most of the phobe arguments against having a gay on the team.
You're left with Avante's "people like me will be phobes" argument.
Dude, one minute I;m the guy who wanted Robinson out the next, hahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Do you think at all before posting? Slow down, concentrate..ok?
lol @ the expert on stupid .
Answer the question: Why would you be talking about it?
You're the guy rehashing the arguments used against Robinson and re purposing them in your quest to exclude gays. You do the math.
How do we know...without incident...?
And I am talking football as far as gay players go.
You would have back then, because you're just a follower when it comes right down to it, and that is more important to you than perfromance. No big deal.
It's hilarious that you are the only poster in this thread that holds the view that you do. Yet somehow, everyone else is the aberration. Good luck with that line of reasoning.
When I played football the reward for missing a block in practice was to play the part of the in "smear the ".
Didn't I say....OH YUCK...already? You honestly think nothing would have been made about a new NFLer kissing his boyfriend?
Ok, show me an incident.
There have been gay players in the NFL too. Check your almanac.And I am talking football as far as gay players go.
Thank you for repeating your argument that has nothing to do with performance in actual sport.
flag football has a way of changing a man
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions