You sound like Trill Clinton in the Kerry Rhodes thread.
Why is it that I wouldn't be as upset about dating a woman who lezzes out on the down-low...
Using the word "crusade" when trying to victimize Christianity is about as unintentionally hilarious as it gets, tbh.
You sound like Trill Clinton in the Kerry Rhodes thread.
Why is it that I wouldn't be as upset about dating a woman who lezzes out on the down-low...
Your logic and reasoning has led you to an obsession? Seems destructive.
That's the point bro. I picked my words on purpose.
It's a combination of that and how much Christianity has destroyed America, just in my lifetime.
I also am a big fan of defending people's civil rights, which inherently makes me hostile towards Christianity.
so you're trying to make fun of me for ripping on a religion that forgives child molesters?
That's not very hilarious.
Yet you attack Christians' civil rights...
You can replace Christians with Hispanics and you'd fit right in on Fox News.
That was meant to be tongue in cheek ... but seriously ... that is bit worrisome.
Of course you can be with a woman that experiments with a lez or cheats with some dude and have the same result, but I think you factor that risk.
But that woman who believes or wants to believe her man is straight is not only being lied to but being put at some considerable risk if their sex is unprotected.
All unprotected sex has risks but at least that women is anticipating that, not some other stuff ...just saying.
So lets see if I get this right...
When atheists crusade - They run around and argue about it on the internet
When Christians crusade - They go around with swords and murder anyone who doesn't convert to Christianity
Yup, atheists are the bad ones when it comes to crusading.
Gosh you're slick!
Gosh you're slick!
You can be Christian and not be a fan of religion.
You sound just as extreme as the people you so passionately hate for their extremism. That's the irony of it all. There is nothing logical about an obsession rooted in hatred.
Once again you're falsely equating someone's beliefs with someone's race/sexual orientation. Attacking someone for beliefs they choose is much different than attacking someone for the traits they're born with.
I would also love to hear how I'm infringing on the civil rights of Christians.
Thanks! I knew you would like it.
What about what I've said is extreme? Be specific.
Apparently stuff I say on a message board makes me as extreme as people who blow up abortion clinics and protest funerals, tbh.
I was kidding with my comment as well. I wouldn't be okay with my girlfriend sleeping around on me with anyone. I was just playing with the double-standard a lot of guys have with sexuality.
I agree about undercover relationships in general. They cause a lot of problems, and I am definitely not in the business of defending gay people who do it.
We all know people used Christianity as a tool for other gains than conversion. Thinking otherwise is funny.![]()
I'm not a fan of a religion that forgives child molesters. In this case, that would be Christianity.
I'm not a fan of a religion that forgives child molesters. In this case, that would be Christianity.
Are you asking me or are you asking yourself?
If what you say about the difference is true, then the 14th Amendment wouldn't protect against discrimination based on beliefs. This country sees religious freedom as a sacred right, and they thought so even before they protected race and sexual orientation.
You're infringing on Christians' rights as much as most of the people you're attacking are infringing on gay people's rights. Calling someone else stupid, misguided, evil, whatever, or saying that their belief system is bad is not an attack on civil rights, so neither or nor vocal anti-gay activists are doing anything wrong.
Voting against measures such as marriage is also not violating civil rights. If it were, we wouldn't vote on it in the first place. It's saying that anyone who votes against the legalization of marijuana is violating the pot-smokers' civil rights. We have a democratic process, and most people on both sides are using it.
Just read his Kerry Rhodes and I dont agree with everything or the numbers though I have never really looked in to it (not a stats guy outside of sports either) ...
And No I dont think it should be a double standard if you cheat especially with no protection you put your partner at risk ...gay or straight.
But some women that have been burnt not only have those risks but also it really effs with their mind.
Where I agree with Trill is not that Jason needed to come out, but just dont get married, engaged or be intimate with women.
If you need an excuse to fit in, if you dont want to be outed ...play the religous card and say you are saving it for marriage ... until you are ready to be out the closet.
Sleeping with a woman for appearance sake while you pillow bitin' on the down low is reprehensible.
Last edited by Killakobe81; 05-01-2013 at 09:09 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)