Reply With Quote
No because the forum settings generally don't allow double clicking the reply button.
Still waiting for you to explain what you will do when the WBC gets to Oklahoma.
Well I did minor in it and enjoy looking at all the sad cases that can be found everywhere; all it is is a dash of common sense and observatory skills and ton of memorizing odd mental disease names. Ignorant combative atheists are a personal favorite of mine.it's ing sad if you ask me. The internet is a giant megaphone and some are obnoxiously louder than others. They probably don't get enough love in real life and look for it anywhere they can get it. Now they're going to accuse us for being internet psychologists.
No because the forum settings generally don't allow double clicking the reply button.
Still waiting for you to explain what you will do when the WBC gets to Oklahoma.
Probably just try to prevent them from doing anything in the city limits; we're not exactly a violent community.
So Christians think one guy sticking his d*ck inside another guys ass is an abomination?
Well, gotta side with the Christians on this one, tbh.
Most laws in the old testament were largely common sense things for the protection of the health of people. S fish and Pork carried all sorts of especially without refrigeration and proper cooking. sexuality was probably seen as a rather good way to spread disease by sticking your into a hole where literal is, so it would probably be in the best interest of the community to cut down on that. So on and so forth.
Nah, even if they enter city limits, you won't do anything about it.
I'm actually in a couple of atheist clubs in real life, (who are trying to convert me lol) and a couple of communities online. For the most part they are all really intelligent with rather impressive degrees and jobs and such; it's the ones on the lower end of the stick I find amusing.
We probably would, believe it or not Oklahoma is a rather religious state and just about everyone who practices Christianity sees WBC as an abomination.
At what point in the New Testament did society no longer need protection from sexuals?
Cool. What exactly will you good Christians do about them when they arrive?
It was still frowned against, Jesus just said maybe we should probably stop beating people to death with stones to enforce it.
Yes, I'd like fries with that.
that's funny because I find the Christians that want to disavow the Old Testament hilarious.
Why stop killing them if they pose such a hazard?
Why kill them in the first place if they really aren't much of a hazard?
Christians don't disavow the Old Testament, we acknowledge it's our history. We just don't practice it's teachings because it was instructed by Jesus Christ; his teachings being the basis of Christianity. (It's in the name)
I just took the psychology classes for fun, no way in I'd try to make a career out of it.
Probably either have the city or police prevent them from picketing in OKC or just have people picket their picket.
Denial of climate change is tied to the general evangelical denial of mainstream science. They believe scientists are part of a nefarious agenda to destroy belief in God anyway, so believing that scientists are part of a nefarious agenda to bring about Global Communism with prevention of climate change as its pretext is not a stretch.
Most global warming scientists agree that they were initially wrong with their hypothesis. Don't have the facts in front of me but pretty sure this is accurate.
Precisely why they had to change the name from 'Global Warming' to 'Climate Change'.
To some of the dudes on this board, Christians = Old Testament Jews no matter how much you tell them those laws are nulled by Christ.
So when are you going to sacrifice your next goat bro? I think I'm past due.
I thought Satanists sacrifice goats and Jews sacrifice sheep o.oTo some of the dudes on this board, Christians = Old Testament Jews no matter how much you tell them those laws are nulled by Christ.
So when are you going to sacrifice your next goat bro? I think I'm past due.
Yeah, they agree they were wrong by being too conservative in their estimates. Scientific consensus is that the earth is warming even faster than they predicted and is directly tied to carbon emissions.
Do you believe that climate change / global warming is a hoax? Or as your "esteemed" Senator put it, "the second-largest hoax ever played on the American people, after the separation of church and state."?
Do you believe the earth is 6000 years old as well?
Really? That's interesting. As far as I know, a high priest in Leviticus had two goats, one killed as a sin offering while the other was let go into the wilderness as a removal of sin.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions