Actually I do get to dictate what is talked about as I will now remove myself from further discussing the absurdity of a five year olds right to bear arms.
I'm simply curious if you have the right to purchase it, but not the right to bear it.
Actually I do get to dictate what is talked about as I will now remove myself from further discussing the absurdity of a five year olds right to bear arms.
I think the distinction is who keeps physical possession of the weapons.
All you do is nitpick, so yes, I was and still am correct. Your own game bit you in the ass.
Statist pussy.
to nitpick a bit more, they never said they were good with guns at six either.
If the 5 year old was emancipated, then I would agree with you.
The cons ution doesn't spell out every detail. Things like when a child was considered a man or a woman have bearing, as it was part of the culture that wasn't needed to be defined in written law.
No, that's moving the goal posts again.
Sure. As long as we're clear your simply nitpicking.
Started shooting at six does not mean they were good with guns, as you said.
Perfectly clear. Why are you even asking? Nitpicking posts is your M.O.
What age do you think is the appropriate age to own a gun?
Doesn't mean they're against a five year old having one.
Keep up with yourself.
That's up for the parents to decide. As I don't have my own kids yet, I can't say as I would have to make sure they were not re ed first.
You claimed they disagreed with me. Keep up with yourself.
I misread your question as to when to be allowed to shoot a gun. To own one? I'd probably let my kid "own" one when he/she was of legal age to buy his/her own. He/she could shoot the out of mine up until that point and that would be encouraged if they enjoyed it.
You agreed you were nitpicking. Either you are or you aren't. No real difference between 6 and 5 other than nitpicking.
You suck at my game.
I looked it up. It's 18 for long gun, 21 for hand gun?
If this is correct, do you feel the 18 year old has a cons utional right to own and bear a handgun?
When you go out of your way to quote me and say I was wrong, of course I'll nitpick and point out you were in fact wrong. I'm done discussing the nitpicking. You are nitpicking the nitpicking, I can't imagine coming on a message board and posting in the manner you do, it must be tiring. Do you keep a logbook of posts or have a notepad next to your computer?
You had to look that up? You really don't know about firearms, at least you've admitted it.
Sure, when he turns 21.If this is correct, do you feel the 18 year old has a cons utional right to own and bear a handgun?
Yup pretty much. And one that exhibits poor self control.
The point that is being missed here is that the rights of the child are subordinate to the parents. Children do not own property. It is the parents that own it. If a parent decides to allow a child to shoot then that is their perogative. There are issues with child endangerment of course.
What's wrong with teaching kids how to properly use a weapon?
the death-peddling gun industry is a corrupt, unethical as the cigarette industry.
Get 'em hooked young, get 'em hooked for life.
the gun industry doesn't care about "properly", only about selling as much guns and ammo, TO ANYBODY, as they can, by ANY means.
I've admitted it plenty of times.
18 year olds go off to die for our country in the military. Why are you grossly denying brave men and women of our armed forces their 2nd Amendment rights?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)