Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 31
  1. #1
    Win. Whatever it Takes Whisky Dog's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Post Count
    6,052
    Thanks for being so ing clueless on defense

    Signed,

    Manu Ginobili

  2. #2
    Veteran davidbowie's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    2,697


  3. #3
    Veteran james evans's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Post Count
    5,780
    he's also a 1st class flopper. i've disliked this guy since he was in toronto cuz he always kills us with his flopping as we don't have an answer for it.

  4. #4
    Believe. pikkiwoki's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Post Count
    456
    Actually on the game winner, Jack did the right thing. It was the rookie Barnes who done fukked up. In the post game presser Mark Jackson said they were supposed to switch all screens. Jack switched, Barnes didn't...game over.

  5. #5
    Real Warrior Warlord23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Post Count
    6,025
    Although he played well in the 1st OT, Jack had 2 missed FGAs and a TO in the last few minutes of regulation. He also turned it over and missed 1 FT in the 2nd OT. All in all, I'm happy if Jack feels the need to take shots off isolation plays; he may make a few shots but will have his fair share of -ups

  6. #6
    Veteran Gervin44Silas13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    1,071
    fUGG THAT dUDE!

  7. #7
    veni, vidi, vici naico's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    1,275
    lol Mark Jackson. Good motivating isn't good coaching.

  8. #8
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    "to switch all screens. Jack switched, Barnes didn't"

    but there was no screen, no pick, as Kenny Smith pointed out. "I'm not screened, so I'll stay with my guy"

    Was the no-pick part of Pop's play?



  9. #9
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    Actually on the game winner, Jack did the right thing. It was the rookie Barnes who done fukked up. In the post game presser Mark Jackson said they were supposed to switch all screens. Jack switched, Barnes didn't...game over.
    I think it was pretty ambiguous as to whether that was an actual screen. That's probably what confused Barnes/Jack. From Jack's perspective, it was, because he didn't want to stay with Diaw (bad match-up for the Warriors in the post) and was very inclined to switch. Barnes wanted to stay on Parker (it was the better match-up for the Warriors), so when he didn't actually get touched by Diaw, he assumed there was no screen set and kept playing.

    If Pop drew the play up to take advantage of that ambiguity, he deserves a lot of credit. That's some great meta-coaching right there.

  10. #10
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    "to switch all screens. Jack switched, Barnes didn't"

    but there was no screen, no pick, as Kenny Smith pointed out. "I'm not screened, so I'll stay with my guy"

    Was the no-pick part of Pop's play?


    I hadn't refreshed the window. That's pretty much what I was saying.

  11. #11
    Ruffy RuffnReadyOzStyle's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    24,209
    It's easy to diss the guy right now but he played a really good game and could've won it for them. He's a big threat in this series because we find it hard to guard him and Steph when they're on the court together. I'd like to see CoJo have a crack at defending him.

  12. #12
    Mr. Dignity Solid D's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    23,462
    If Barnes was supposed to switch non-ball screens on that last SOOB play, then he should have switched to Ginobili. Manu set the first screen for TP before flaring to the wing. Barnes continued to follow TP around Manu's screen and Boris' fake screen. That's an old play from Sean Elliott's playing days. The play is designed to pass to the fake/slipped screener as the 1st option (Diaw in this case).

  13. #13
    Chunky Brazil's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    30,520
    Manu input on the play:

    ""On the last play, it wasn't for me; they just left me open," Ginobili said. "I set a screen for TP [Tony Parker] and they both went with him and left me open on the weak side. When I caught it I just saw Brazemore flying. I just gave it a lot of air and it went in."I wasn't even an option. They told me just go screen and stay far from the play. The play was for Tony or Boris. And they got confused."

  14. #14
    Chunky Brazil's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    30,520
    BTW props to Kawi for keeping his cool and for the good decision

  15. #15
    Believe. pikkiwoki's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Post Count
    456
    I think it was pretty ambiguous as to whether that was an actual screen. That's probably what confused Barnes/Jack. From Jack's perspective, it was, because he didn't want to stay with Diaw (bad match-up for the Warriors in the post) and was very inclined to switch. Barnes wanted to stay on Parker (it was the better match-up for the Warriors), so when he didn't actually get touched by Diaw, he assumed there was no screen set and kept playing.

    If Pop drew the play up to take advantage of that ambiguity, he deserves a lot of credit. That's some great meta-coaching right there.
    agree. if pop did that intentionally, what a ing genius lol.

    i'm not sure how defenders are coached to handle those gray area situations when they're told to switch everything. i would think that you'd play "switch everything" like a match-up zone, where you cover whoever comes into your area, to negate any picks. so the fact that manu crossed barnes' face should have been barnes' cue to switch onto manu. i don't know if that's the way barnes should have read it, just my guess.

  16. #16
    Believe. Malice's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    1,012
    Props to Manu to even knowing who the dude Brazemore was, TBH....

  17. #17
    Believe. pikkiwoki's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Post Count
    456
    Props to Manu to even knowing who the dude Brazemore was, TBH....
    not really though, in the postgame interview manu looks down at the statsheet to get the guy's name


    edit: here it is, looks at the statsheet around the 0:40 mark
    http://www.nba.com/spurs/video/2013/...anumov-2470879
    Last edited by pikkiwoki; 05-07-2013 at 04:56 PM.

  18. #18
    Veteran ginobilized's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    2,294
    In rewatching the game winner, HWSNBN did us another solid by applying no pressure whatsoever on Kawhi inbounding the ball

    Thanks to HWSNBN

  19. #19
    Veteran Raven's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Post Count
    17,954
    it may be the first time ever he didn't go off against us..

  20. #20
    Believe. Malice's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    1,012
    not really though, in the postgame interview manu looks down at the statsheet to get the guy's name

    HAHA that makes more sense.

  21. #21
    Veteran rjv's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    10,201
    the look on jack's face (actually, his body language) when manu shot the three is classic. jack knew it was in as soon as manu took the shot.

  22. #22
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    agree. if pop did that intentionally, what a ing genius lol.

    i'm not sure how defenders are coached to handle those gray area situations when they're told to switch everything. i would think that you'd play "switch everything" like a match-up zone, where you cover whoever comes into your area, to negate any picks. so the fact that manu crossed barnes' face should have been barnes' cue to switch onto manu. i don't know if that's the way barnes should have read it, just my guess.
    Also, on the play, Jack was expecting to have to switch. The only reason he was lined up on Diaw was to switch off a screen. So when Diaw and Ginobili ran past each other, Jack assumed a pick had happened when it hadn't. Barnes saw there was no pick and stayed. It's hard to know who was more right, though. It's hard to give Jack the benefit of the doubt. He switched pointlessly a couple of times. I think he was being lazy on defense and didn't want to fight over screens.

  23. #23
    Believe. DatBoyGood's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Post Count
    1,472
    look at the assistant coach next to Mark Jackson on the Manu's game winner

  24. #24
    Believe. KenziE's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Post Count
    982
    In rewatching the game winner, HWSNBN did us another solid by applying no pressure whatsoever on Kawhi inbounding the ball

    Thanks to HWSNBN
    i was telling my wife about this too hahaha

  25. #25
    Hedo Layup Drill ShoogarBear's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Post Count
    39,519
    If Barnes was supposed to switch non-ball screens on that last SOOB play, then he should have switched to Ginobili. Manu set the first screen for TP before flaring to the wing. Barnes continued to follow TP around Manu's screen and Boris' fake screen. That's an old play from Sean Elliott's playing days. The play is designed to pass to the fake/slipped screener as the 1st option (Diaw in this case).
    Yeah, Barnes should have switched to Ginobili. But Bazemore didn't even try to switch to Parker. I can't figure out if that because he actually anticipated the next switch to Diaw or if he just got lucky. I have to guess that if he had switched to Parker, Diaw would have been wide open underneath (which might have been the original intention).

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •