Reply With Quote
In the East...
LeBron had atrocious teammates who rarely bailed him out in Cleveland and still went to the Finals, tbh.....
In the East...
raven right about dem methlahomas
Not really debating Lebron had scrubs teammates that couldn't bail him out even when they tried.
They both deffered to their teammates all the time though which was my point.
What took ya so long pops, we were both online but ya waited for me to be offline to post this eh? Trying to shoot a fastball by me
Deflecting
The "most trollable" trolling a supposedly mature person/old .
How was my prediction wrong? I said they are a better team without Westbrook. That doesn't mean they would beat the Grizz with Westbrook. I said they wouldn't even beat the Clippers. How do you figure I thought they could beat the Grizz?What took ya so long pops, we were both online but ya waited for me to be offline to post this eh? Trying to shoot a fastball by me
Deflecting
The "most trollable" trolling a supposedly mature person/old .
"Russell is like training wheels on a bike. As long as he's there, they will never go full speed. When he's gone, they'll struggle for a while to stay upright, but eventually they'll be better off without him than with him. That's not to say they don't need a good PG, but they don't need a shoot first, 2nd and 3rd PG. They need a balanced scoring attack. Any team that has RW isn't going to have balanced scoring and RW isn't good enough to carry a team." -DMC
LOL you resorting to the "I'm to young and stupid, you should be ashamed" defense.
All that calling me out and here I've undressed you in front of the world.
Oh, andat you thinking I check you online status before posting. Unlike you, I don't work at a drivethru so I actually have responsibilities to attend to. You're not one of them.
I think both of you are right.How was my prediction wrong? I said they are a better team without Westbrook. That doesn't mean they would beat the Grizz with Westbrook. I said they wouldn't even beat the Clippers. How do you figure I thought they could beat the Grizz?
"Russell is like training wheels on a bike. As long as he's there, they will never go full speed. When he's gone, they'll struggle for a while to stay upright, but eventually they'll be better off without him than with him. That's not to say they don't need a good PG, but they don't need a shoot first, 2nd and 3rd PG. They need a balanced scoring attack. Any team that has RW isn't going to have balanced scoring and RW isn't good enough to carry a team." -DMC
LOL you resorting to the "I'm to young and stupid, you should be ashamed" defense.
All that calling me out and here I've undressed you in front of the world.
Oh, and
100%Duncan is currently being proved right due to OKC choking and the fact that OKC is still shook up from the loss and clearly never recovered. But in the long run, you'd be right DMC.
OKC would be just fine during the course of the season. I'd say they would still be top 3 seed without question.
This was such a small sample size that we get too caught up in whose right and who's wrong.
Of course I am right. I didn't say they would beat Memphis without RW. There's no way to know if they would or would not even with RW. I said they will eventually be a better team without RW because RW takes too much of the offensive load and the team needs to be weened from having others do their work on the offensive end. You saw that in them when KD had to take the entire scoring load. Imagine a PG who can distribute the ball to guys like Thabo and Nick while those two are conditioned to score, not just look for Kevin or Russell. , I've seen RW scream at Thabo because he's not accustomed to shooting the ball.
The short sighted "nuh uh" from dip s like 100%Stupid are about like something you'd get from a plebe. Never once understanding the nature of my statement nor even trying to understand it, just running off at the sucker about the next series as if there are alternate universes where the outcomes of both scenarios are playing out, and he knows both.
He's wrong, I'm right. I was also right that the Lakers are better without Kobe. I didn't say the Warriors are better without Curry, but they would be better served if he reigned in some of those contested bombs. They need to get into a higher basketball IQ style of play and stop with the college level bull that moves the crowd.
Not admitting your prediction was wrong.How was my prediction wrong? I said they are a better team without Westbrook. That doesn't mean they would beat the Grizz with Westbrook. I said they wouldn't even beat the Clippers. How do you figure I thought they could beat the Grizz?
"Russell is like training wheels on a bike. As long as he's there, they will never go full speed. When he's gone, they'll struggle for a while to stay upright, but eventually they'll be better off without him than with him. That's not to say they don't need a good PG, but they don't need a shoot first, 2nd and 3rd PG. They need a balanced scoring attack. Any team that has RW isn't going to have balanced scoring and RW isn't good enough to carry a team." -DMC
LOL you resorting to the "I'm to young and stupid, you should be ashamed" defense.
All that calling me out and here I've undressed you in front of the world.
Oh, and
Thinking I'm also an old who's working, I'm still studying Pops, too bad this kid is smarter than you even after all of your years lviing on earth.
Deflecting
Lakers better without Kobe
Ya reaching too far pops.
That Cleveland team wouldn't have gotten out of the 2nd round in the West.
30m more makes the Lakers a much better team.Lakers better without Kobe
Ya reaching too far pops.
Not admitting your prediction was wrong.
Thinking I'm also an old who's working, I'm still studying Pops, too bad this kid is smarter than you even after all of your years lviing on earth.
Deflecting
Look at what just happened instead without him tbh.
Just when I think you can't say anything more stupid than you've said, you prove me wrong. Then I consider where you're from and it makes sense.
Look at what just happened instead without him tbh.
Country smack
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions