Reply With Quote
You aren't willing to put anything on the line.
Even on an anonymous message board.
As stupid as Wild Cobra can be, at least he posts what he actually believes.
You don't, and that's why no one will ever take you seriously. It's as simple as that.
Come at us with what you think really happened on 9/11.
After a full decade plus, you still have nothing -- no truther does. The only reason any of you hold on to this mindset is pride -- which is hilarious since you are at the same time too ashamed to even hint at an actual theory.
You lost dan. You've already given up.
You aren't willing to put anything on the line.
Even on an anonymous message board.
As stupid as Wild Cobra can be, at least he posts what he actually believes.
You don't, and that's why no one will ever take you seriously. It's as simple as that.
Lost?
I'm not waiting for any new evidence to be found...I'm just waiting for the evidence to be released...
Just like NIST put their data out there so it could be peer reviewed right Chumpy?
You haven't done anything with any evidence before, so don't lie about any more evidence, OK?Lost?
I'm not waiting for any new evidence to be found...I'm just waiting for the evidence to be released...
Just like the twoofers made their red paint chips availble for independent review, right dan?
Hey Chump what do you think really happened at the Alamo?
Do you have any proof besides what has been written?
Probably some guys surrendered and were killed later. Either way errbody died.
No. Fortunately there is a lot more evidence than what is written about 9/11.Do you have any proof besides what has been written?
You act like I have not payed attention to this subject. It's not as if you are some font of insight into the tragedy over the last decade. You have been pulling out the same tired bull since this site opened. Sure, every now and then you will parrot something you see from your favorite conspiracy website but that is about it.
Even your back and forth with Chump is the same bull but you have yet to give an alternate theory of what happened. You are just sophist for the notion that there is a national conspiracy and have zero interest in finding out what actually happened.
Nbadan thinks the government trained the hijackers, made them, the people on all four planes, and the planes themselves disappear forever, then had duplicate planes piloted by experienced pilots fly into the WTC's, the Pentagon, and a field (for some reason).
I am not joking. Nbadan seriously believes that that happened.
Quote? That right there sums up the bush=got-one-right club...I'm losing on facts, so I better throw out some straw...
If you've been paying attention then at least get your facts straight...I never said the government did it....You act like I have not payed attention to this subject. It's not as if you are some font of insight into the tragedy over the last decade. You have been pulling out the same tired bull since this site opened. Sure, every now and then you will parrot something you see from your favorite conspiracy website but that is about it.
Some fun facts for Fuzzy Wuzzy...
Is SA210 a troll of your or are you just taking notes from him?
And let's be clear. You do not believe that the government is covering something up?
a troll = posting facts you don't like
If you wanna criticize NBADan without you getting so butthurt and deflecting, then just point out how he left out Obama's murderous war criminal policy and how much more money Obama has spent in Afghanistan and other illegal wars, and the Americans and civilian deaths under Obama, suicides etc, instead of just keeping it on war criminal Bush.
I don't disagree that Bush's foreign policy was awful and contributed to alienating the majority of the ME nor that it was marred by violence against our diplomatic core and military.
I fail to see what bearing that has on an attack that occurred in the first year of his presidency. All that tells me is that his conspiracy is driven by his political bias and not on facts. If anything, it drives home the notion that Arab terrorists indeed flew those planes into the towers. They certainly tried very hard to get at us across the rest of the world.
The reason why I compared him to you is because posting meme's demonstrates an inability to articulate and even worse, a failure to think for ones self. For example, your political takes are 95% memes and youtubes while what you write is misquotes, smilies and juvenile back and forth with chump.
That's just your opinion bc you don't like what's being said. Facts are facts regardless of what form they come in. There is nothing false about that meme he posted, but it was easy for you to spin it and bring me up bc you didn't like the factual info in it. Like I said in another thread, I posted many memes and you-tubes during Bush's Presidency, and for some reasons the pictures and YouTubes were NEVER a problem to the fake liberals of the board, in fact they cheered them on, laughed their asses off and defended them, all the time. Now that the memes and you-tubes are against their current war criminal President who wears a D, the fake liberals of the board ARE butthurt and suddenly don't like it. And the Republicans of the board already didn't like me bc of my takes on Bush so both ignorant sides love to circle jerk with eachother now when it comes to me, shows their true character. Get over yourself. lol
That's YOUR problem if you don't like the way in which facts are given, and no thats not the only way I express myself, you lie. It's a message board btw, I can post a YouTube or pic if I want. Your baseless flame wars are hilarious.Oh, and....
But anyway, back to the topic.
Still talking about me, eh?
And you never got back to the topic.
Now you can -- what do you think really happened to make WTC 7 collapse?
We will not expect a real answer. Just more ankle biting and posts about me.
Memes are to political thought as picture books are to literature.
You have few, if any, independent political takes. Even your 'fake liberal' schtick is straight out of one of your youtubes. So go ahead and call them facts and I will consider them spoon fed political thought. If you want to be their monkey then go right ahead.
So, I'm wrong? You don't think the government made duplicate planes and had experienced pilots fly them on 9/11?
I'll be your honey-suckle......
I guess this was too hard to figure out.
So explain to me what bearing those tallies are on an attack that occurred in Bush's first year in office. I don't go for the bait and switch. We are talking about you thinking there is a government conspiracy to hide from us the facts around the 9/11 facts. What bearing does it have beyond your desire to fellate Obama?
No, not at all, but I have explored the theory that at least some of the planes were duplicated and were remotely flown into the towers ....so that is why the transponders were turned off....but that theory always seems to go back to if the planes were duplicated, then what the happened to the real planes?
No answer.
...anyway, what bothers me most about 9/11 is the math ....the way things worked out the way they did that day for the terrorists...from the incredible odds that 4 planes would be successfully hijacked, the odds that each plane would be commandeered...the incredible odds that the pilots all reach their targets ...and make incredible maneuvers to hit those targets...the NORAD delays...the war games....phantom radar and transponders....unexplained drones...yada..yada..yada...
And what are your statistics based off? You're basically making an argument from ignorance: "I can't see how things happened the way they happened, so they must have happened another way."
FIFU
Ignorance is just accepting that everything happen the way someone says it happened..IMO"I can't see how things happened the way they happened, so they could have happened another way."
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
