Reply With Quote
HUHweather modification definitely involved tbh
I pose that question to you info warriors out there.
Was this Tornado a man made creation of Obama to divert attention away from Benghazi and word changing?
HUHweather modification definitely involved tbh
CO2, derrrrr
it wont change anything because just like the plant in West, people won't give a about Oklahomans.
Yes
I have to agree with The Reckoning on this. Location means everything. If this tornado on steroids had happened in Pennsylvania, NY, New Jersey, Ohio, Illinois, or DC then people would give a big . However, this is Oklahoma so people will won't give that much of a . Not that many people gave a during the OKC bombing. If 9/11 had happened in like Montana or Wyoming, do you think people would have given a about it?
Laughably untrue.
More people cared about 9/11 than the OKC bombing because 9/11 mostly happened in NYC. Location matters.
Just ask Mouse.
It was either the "Russian Woodpecker," or "HAARP."
well it did seem to only affect red states
It also killed a lot more people.
I thought maybe HarlemHeat was visiting, iow, a God made tornado
Wats Wheather?
wheather is when its graining cats and dogs.
it appeared increasingly likely that residents who lost homes and businesses would turn to the federal government for emergency disaster aid. That could put the state's two Republican senators in an awkward position.
Sens. Jim Inhofe and Tom Coburn, both Republicans, are fiscal hawks who have repeatedly voted against funding disaster aid for other parts of the country. They also have opposed increased funding for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), which administers federal disaster relief.
Late last year, Inhofe and Coburn both backed a plan to slash disaster relief to victims of Hurricane Sandy. In a December press release, Coburn complained that the Sandy Relief bill contained "wasteful spending," and identified a series of items he objected to, including "$12.9 billion for future disaster mitigation activities and studies."
Coburn spokesman John Hart on Monday evening confirmed that the senator will seek to ensure that any additional funding for tornado disaster relief in Oklahoma be offset by cuts to federal spending elsewhere in the budget. "That's always been his position [to offset disaster aid]," Hart said. "He supported offsets to the bill funding the OKC bombing recovery effort." Those offsets were achieved in 1995 by tapping federal funds that had not yet been appropriated.
In 2011, both senators opposed legislation that would have granted necessary funding for FEMA when the agency was set to run out of money. Sending the funds to FEMA would have been "unconscionable," Coburn said at the time.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...=Daily%20Brief
the oilcos pay for these two assholes, why don't the oilcos pay for disaster relief?
lol blue team. Never pass an opportunity to politicize a disaster.
lol @ the "enlightened progressives" cackling like demented school children over the wreckage of Moore in the comments section. Stay classy, progressives.
Seriously?
Going strictly by the number of deaths, the 9/11 attacks were about 1785% worse than the OKC bombing.
You need to explain why you think OKC is the same as 9/11 except only for the location.
Yeah. Both were horrible, but the scope is off my several orders of magnitude. Not really comparable other than superficially.
[QUOTE=TeyshaBlue;6582495]lol blue team. Never pass an opportunity to politicize a disaster.[/QUOTE
Just pointing out how the (OK) Repugs politicized non-OK disasters with the blind ideology of cutting/hating govt. Even now, Coburn's blind ideology says any disaster money for OK must be offset by cuts elsewhere (but not in tax expenditures for his owners the oilcos)
BTW Boo, that Sandy bill was a bull bill that was stuffed with unrelated pork. It ended up passing after they stripped most of the crap out of it.
that wasn't Coburn's point.
He wants ALL FEMA spending offset by cuts elsewhere.
what did these excellent, God-fearing, Bible-thumping OKies do that God punishes them so severely?
they are for same sex marriage? lots of (closeted) gays and lesbians?
Mic e Bachman, or this guy
http://www.nationalmemo.com/5-most-o...e-w-jackson/2/
and other "Christian" people must have the answers.
lol @ boutons mangling language and logic to attempt to work another talking point into the disaster.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
