Yes he did. He had some good takes recently, and pretty much wiped them away with that lame take.
ESPN loves great teams that play smart, even teams that don't score a lot of points, regardless of their market size...as long as they're in the NFL or MLB.
Yes he did. He had some good takes recently, and pretty much wiped them away with that lame take.
Bolded words are practically an oxymoron tbh. Fox isn't known for intelligence or accuracy.
Right, and the Grizzlies run so much themselves. Lol
Fox Sports on TV has enough local people and local coverage that they usually don't overlook teams, but their radio broadcasts are syndicated nationwide, which is when analysis suffers. Could be worse: ESPN starts with an E for a reason and NBA.com hired Van Earl Wright.![]()
And it's worth noting that the only guys left from the 2007 squad are the Big 3 and the Red Mamba.
At least she's being honest about it
Well there's no way I see it happening, but I know the media would be just furious if it ended up Spurs/Pacers or even worse, Grizz/Pacers in the finals.
Frankly I wouldn't care much about a Grizz/Pacers finals. I mean I'd watch but... damn it would be boring. And the Spurs would slaughter the Pacers...so I could understand others being turned off by the match up. It kind of reminds me of when the Lakers would always match up with the Pacers in the Finals during the early 2000's. Those series would NEVER go beyond 5 games. The Lakers would just dominate.
But ESPN and company don't have to worry. I would consider this Pacers team beating this Heat team in a best of 7 series the greatest upset in sports history. I just CAN'T see it happening. I have the Heat in 4 myself...The pacers are offensively challenged...and they have a ton of match up problems with Miami across the board.
Indiana is 6-0 at home and 2-4 on the road. Paul George is the third best SF in the league when he plays at home, but he's worse than Leonard when he's on the road.
I agree for the most part with that comment. The four teams I would have personally picked would be the Thunder (pre-injury), Spurs, Grizzlies and Heat. Of course, 3 of those teams are Western Conference, so that could never happen. But those 4 would be my pick. Having to take a second Eastern team, and having to adjust for OKC's injuries, I would then agree with your assessment.
Pacers did take them to 6 last year.
I don't think the Pacers win, but I do think it won't be nearly as easy for Miami as you might suggest.
That is the main top players so it is not a fresh face.
For what it's worth, the Lakers and Pacers only met once in the Finals (in 2000) and the Lakers won in 6, winning games by 17, 7, 2 (in OT), and 5 and losing games by 9 and 33.
Oh. Well I was mainly referring to whichever Eastern Conference team they played. Shouldn't have mentioned the Pacers specifically.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)