"Just leave me alone!"
spurs need a playmaker on the court, we cant have ginoboli being a playmaker and scorer at the same time when his on the court with fetuses that shoulve been aborted long time ago, dude does stupid and bad decision making for his own personal glory....
6 posts now.
"Leave me alone" shtick.
Because in the playoffs you don't give up layups. You foul and make players earn them from the line. If Manu DOESN'T foul, then he has to hear it from Pop for giving up an easy layup.
It was a normal foul. Allen escalating it with major acting and likely an upcoming fine has nothing to do with Gino.
Embarrassed for OP
Same he pulled against Dirk in Game 7 of the 2006 WCF. Luckily, he got bailed out in OT this time.
i hear ya. I still don't consider him a true leader, not in the same calibre as Timmy, but he is underrated. Plus i'll always give credit to someone deserving and so I'll gladly eat my words if he keeps playing like this. Still, his heroball will never go away but just have to accept it at this point. But if he makes the smart passes like most of tonight, he's amazing.I dont know man, Im confused. Both of us know about his past history but I just want to believe in him and be wrong about him so bad.
When did this Jag-Mid feud begin, tbh?..
Tim just said in the press conference that Manu did the right thing and I don't think he was saying it just to not throw Manu on the fire.
Mid ting on _JaG, tbh....
couple days ago, IIRC... personally sad to watch my s going at it... but sometimes you gotta let them vent, IMO
Manu made the right call, IMO. Even if Allen is a good free throw shooter, you gotta make him earn it rather than just giving it to him. Its not Manu's fault that the refs were horrific in the second half, and still blew that call with the benefit of a replay.
I'm a fan of OP but this thread is pretty ing bad..not sure how he's winning anything here..already admitted he shouldn't have made it..Mid ting on _JaG, tbh....
Not a real feud, to be completely and totally 100% honest.
I just can't help but clown on people who change their opinions of players from game to game.
If you hate Tony...cool.
If you hate Manu...cool.
If you hate Ricky Davis....cool.
But you look like a got when you jerk someone off for playing well and then start a thread about how they aren't clutch or should die when they don't play well. It's GNSF-esque
I'm not seeing it imo. I'm seeing postgame meltdowns, that's all
Hes no Timmy or prime Manu, but if he plays like he has these two games and leads this team to the Finals Ill give him his props for overcoming his soft choker label. Im pulling for my French tbh.
Had to do with Parker if Im not mistaken. For some reason nothing bothers _Jag more than criticizing Tony, now hes just using any excuse to go at mid. He follows me into my threads for the same reason too but I dont really pay the much attention tbh.
Meh, Mid jumped the gun a bit with this thread, but _JaG's
Spurs fans have alot invested in this, understandably so. It would give the organization enormous validation to represent the Western Conference given the nature of this season's expectations from OKC and LAL. So I understand Mid getting emotional over that dumb foul.
For the record:
Manu has special qualities about him that Tony will never have. That being said, 60% of the time Manu is on the court he plays like a re . The other 40% he does game-winning .
But there's no guarantee a foul stops him from scoring. How many times have we seen a player try to prevent an easy layup/dunk with a foul only for it to turn into an and 1?
Are you sure it's Pop's MO to foul at that point in the game, with 26 seconds left? I'm sure he'll go to bat for Manu and say it was a good foul, but I just think playing the odds by not fouling is the smarter play. Putting a player at the FT line in that situation also risks him making the 1st, missing the second, opposing team gets the offensive rebound and ties the game with a 3.
By not fouling you remove every bit of risk that can happen to you. Why risk it on the chance he misses a FT? Maybe if Allen was Dwight Howard, but he shoots about 80% and was 4-4 in the game.
If this was at the 5 minute mark (or even the 1 minute mark), I totally agree with fouling. But the clock at 26 seconds changes things.
wasn't a dumb foul. you want to foul someone instead of giving up 2 free points; make them earn it at the line. it was a dumb turnover though..
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote