Well when somebody tells me something a 100 times I get it. What an idiot!
I told you it wasn't serious and that's exactly what we are going to see. You are a moron~~~~~~~~~~
you obviously did not, you dumb got
So tell me again moron just how serious was it since nothing is going to happen to those girls, yep...not very!I guess what happened to Emmett Till wasn't serious, since nothing happened to his murderers. Don't claim that this is somehow different, because you are arguing that if somebody gets away with something, it wasn't serious.
claiming I'm disconnected from reality when you seriously think that people always pay for their misdeeds
Well when somebody tells me something a 100 times I get it. What an idiot!
I told you it wasn't serious and that's exactly what we are going to see. You are a moron~~~~~~~~~~
You told me that it wasn't serious based on the extremely idiotic belief that people are always punished for their misdeeds. You are a ing mouth breather~~~~~~~~~~
What you never seemed to get (not surprised being a moron) was the degree of wrong/seriousness there. To a dummy like you iT was..OH MY GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...when to me and everyone else with even half a brain it was...bad girls!
You were wrong again Woo, those girls will get what something like that deserves, which is....not much.
NEXT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So, if boys ripped a girl's clothes off, it would be "bad boys!"? If a man ripped a woman's clothes off, it would be "bad men!"?
Prove it.You were wrong again Woo
those girls will get what something like that deserves, which is....not much.Yes, because history has taught us that people always get what they deserve!
NEXT RE ED TAKE BY AVANTE!!!! I enjoy dismantling your infantile, hypocritical arguments.
Talk about dylusional, wow~~~~~~~~~~
I told you...no big deal..as we will see...no big deal. You were wrong as you always are. You ever deal in facts? The...facts...are, only uptight little know nothings like you saw that as some ....YIKES!!!!!!!!!...the rest of us...dumb kids.
This is too easy.
Avante dodges the question yet again! If you are so right about everything, why do you keep dodging questions?
Again, is it no big deal if a couple of boys ripped a girl's clothes off? Is it no big deal when a man rips a woman's clothes off?
Pay attention, you can do this...
Nobody is talking about adults, you got that? Yes believe it or not the law and everyone else (with a brain) realizes kids are kids. That's why we adults are responsible for them until 18, honest!!!
Still with me moron?
Ok...
In our society boys and girls are looked at differently, yes I know news to your dumbass. A little boy is suppose to get into fights, act like a little monster, not so with little girls. A girl hits a boy, big deal. A boy hits a girl it is a big deal. A boy has tons of girl friends, it';s..atta boy!..how about a girl having lots of boyfriends? You really don't understand any of that do you?
Woo, where in the did you grow up, was it on this planet?
The government still prosecutes kids for breaking the law, dumb got.
I already know that there is a double standard in our society. I want to know why you think it's okay for a little boy to be stripped naked by girls but that it's not okay for boys to strip a little girl naked. Both are being stripped naked against their will. Why are you such a ing hypocrite?In our society boys and girls are looked at differently, yes I know news to your dumbass. A little boy is suppose to get into fights, act like a little monster, not so with little girls. A girl hits a boy, big deal. A boy hits a girl it is a big deal. You really don't understand any of that do you?
I grew up on a planet where it was illegal to pin another human being down and strip them naked. What ing planet did you grow up on?Woo, where in the did you grow up, was it on this planet?
A dumb got thinks kids get treated like an adult.
That's right got we do have a double standard right or wrong, Something I am talking about you moron.
So just how illegal is it idiot when giggIng kids with no physical harm intented are involved? it's illegal to steal chewing gum and rob a bank, I know...huh? You know oral sex is illegal in some states?
Do you even understand the word....degrees?...at all.
Dumb got puts words in my mouth yet again.
I know that there is a double standard, dumb got. I want to know your justification for it.That's right got we do have a double standard right or wrong, Something I am talking about you moron.
It's just as illegal as a giggling man stripping a woman naked against her will.So just how illegal is it idioot when gigglung kids with no physical harm intented involved?
Do you even understand the word....degrees?...at all.You are right about everything, but can't make an argument that isn't a strawman.
Do you understand the phrase "juvenile court" at all, dumb got?
More total bull .
That's right moron...Juvenile Court.....BINGO~!
Talk abouit one dumb individual, wow!
Bottom line got
It will go just as I said, no big deal. Why?..because it wasn't dummy.
Another incomprehensible post by Avante. Are you ever going to explain why it's okay for girls to strip a boy, but it's not okay for boys to strip a girl or for a man to strip a woman?
Where did I ever say it was ok? Of course it isn't ok, it's wrong. Just not...OH MY GOD!!!!!!!!..wrong like you try to make it out to be. Come on dummy, it's soooooo damn obvious....dumb kids acting dumb.
I'm like most men, it's not cool to take advantage of the weaker sex.
Why you keep talking about men and women????????? That is something total different but being a total moron you don't see it.
What relevance does strength have? In all situations, the victim is overpowered, so strength is irrelevant.
Again, why do you hold boys to higher standards than girls? Why does one's sex matter in regards to the severity of the exact same crime? Why should girls and women be exempt from being punished for their transgressions?
No, it isn't totally different. It's similar enough to be relevant to the conversation.Why you keep talking about men and women????????? That is something total different but being a total moron you don't see it.
Who said anything about females being exempt from anything? They commit a crime they get punished just like a man.
Then there are exceptions, this is one of them. Once again, this is all about....in-tent...ok? We saw some kids totally unaware of what they were really doing. They saw it as harmless fun sand it's totally obvious, yes they were wrong but what kid isn't.
Their intent was to strip a boy naked and film it. A middle school-aged girl knows that that is wrong. Period. The only case, legally speaking, where doing something like this isn't illegal is one where the assailant can be proven not to know right from wrong. You have not, at any point, shown that to be case. "It's obvious!" is not an argument.
Prove that those girls are incapable of discerning right from wrong, or shut the up, dumb got.
It's not about right or wrong ya little ing freak it's about the degree of right or wrong, how many damn times do I have to tell your moronic ass that? It's wrong to drive 45 in a 35 but not nearly as wrong as it is to drive 95 in a 35, I know...ZOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM.
Where's my crayon?
Yes yes and yes....the girls were wrong....but on a whole different degree than your freaky llittle ass is trying to play. This was small stuff, no big thang, minor, tiny, we shouildn't even be talking about it small.
What would you do if something big did happen, explode?
Then, by your own standards, it is no big deal if a man does the exact same thing to a woman or if a boy does the exact same thing to a girl.
By my standards if a man even touchs a woman against her will he needs that hand chopped off and crammed up his ass.
If two little boys are messing around in any way with a little girl against her will they both need one serious ass whipping to the point of blood.
If two little girls are messing with a little boy in anyway against his will, they get a strict warning, grounded, no TV, cell, video games for a month. If they ever do it again, then they get their ass whipped until blood is oozing.
What is your justification for treating females to lower standards than males? I am not asking you whether or not females are equal in strength to males. I am asking you why females who commit the exact same crimes as males should be punished less severely.
Work with me here...
You see a girl about 5-4 130 pounds or so pounding on this guy who stands 6-4 around 250, I'm betting it gets a grin and your ignore it. Now what if the situation was reversed?
You do see the difference there, I hope.
Some things are just like that, you standing there as she changes the flat, you asking her...can you open this, ha~~~~ I hate to break it to you like this, but we are different, honest.
I don't give a . If a girl chose to hit on a guy who is clearly bigger than she is, she deserves what she gets.
That is not what I asked you. Again, why should a boy get a worse punishment than a girl for the exact (i.e., the only difference is the sex of the attacker; everything else is exactly the same) same crime?Some things are just like that, you standing there as she changes the flat, you asking her...can you open this, ha~~~~ I hate to break it to you like this, but we are different, honest.
missed the pointTotally misundertood the girl vs guy bit, why am I not suprised?
It's simply the world we live in, guys open doors, guys stand up when a woman enters the room, guys get out of bed to check that noise in the night, guys change the oil, guys climb on the roof, guys lift that frig when moving.
It's simply a different deal, right or wrong.
I didn't misunderstand anything. I asked you to provide a justification, and you haven't. I already know how the world works. I want you to explain why you would dole out unfair treatment.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)