Reply With Quote
All blacks do is ing , whine, and fail at life they are a pathetic shameful breed.
why are you calling him black president? show some respect.
it'll be easier if blacks didn't have to live under an invisible martial law and people with privilage and power weren't racist and didn't discriminate towards minorities. obama already said he isn't the president for black america so why would he change laws for us?
All blacks do is ing , whine, and fail at life they are a pathetic shameful breed.
all whites do is drive a 1000 miles for some underage poon and get caught on dateline..exit is that way>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
What? He is a black President. How is that disrespectful? He's the first black president and that is a huge deal. Which is why I don't get the complaints about lack of progress. The most powerful country on Earth is led by a black man. Period. I went to a rougher high school my Freshman and Sophmore year with plenty of poor whites, and they got harrassed all the time.
While he said he's not the president for black America, he did say he would put his "track record" up against anyone's with regards to the programs in place to help minorities. You say us as if Obama is excluded - is that how you feel?
what does obama have to do with this anyway? i don't like that clown.
Well it's interesting that you seem to be blaming the whites, while also now claiming that blacks are also not doing enough to help the blacks. It's odd considering the most powerful leader in the world, in the country you live in/complain about, is black.
well you brought him up like since he was black, he would swoop in and save the day whenever there is a race problem. breh, the president aint . he's done a lot for minorities with the dream act and the immigration laws he's trying to implement. all i want him to do is legalize marijuana like he promised. what's in his track record as far as the programs he's put in place for minorites? i rarely listen to anything the guy says.
I am not supporting Obama, I am simply trying to understand how both the white man and a black President can both be the problem at the same time with regards to continued mass prejudice towards the black man. You seem to hint at the fact today is basically no better than slave days or something and that the court system is basically designed to hurt black men.
I find it hard to believe to a certain degree that a black President would allow a massive racial profiling in the court systems - even at the state level without being a major proponent for change.
If blacks were half as awesome as they all seem to think they are, they wouldn't be failing this badly at life. Slavery was like 200 years ago, and its the fault of fellow blacks that they were ever sold into slavery in the first place. Companies don't give a about skin color, they care about bottom line. Blacks are just inferior, we all have to admit this desegregation was a failed experiment.
where did i blame whitey???
Cuz - you claim whitey is racist err day.
so we're not talking about the trial anymore?
Of course we are. You claim whitey is racist. You blaiming whitey, plus the POTUS for the prejudice against the black man and claim the court system is a scam and that ties back into the trial.
Trill - I'm with you on a few things. I definitely think racism is still prevalent and there are injustices. But you troll so hard it's hard to tell when you are being serious or just silly.
Your kind is on the wrong side of the bell curve tbh. Legalizing all them s is only going to fully wipe out blacks from America once and for all. Talk about compe ion for those low skill jobs which they do 10 times better than you all. Blacks will be more rare than a Native American sighting in America in 50 years.
Scroteface - I know you're a DoK troll, but please shut up.
for the record, i don't think all whites are racist. i don't trust our government or obama and i do think the court system is a scam.
Agreed...it's gonna be tough living with the fact that a 17 year old ed you up, but don't ing shoot him.
The previous history of the victim isn't relevant if the defendant has never met the victim. Martin isn't on trial, Zimmerman is.
So was he trespassing or not, and was Zimmerman a security guard or not?
Did Zimmerman know anything about Martin's history when he decided to pursue him?
thinking that's me
Except that George is claiming he was attacked. Such testimony I think should be relevant.
your statement is rather inaccurate.
Martin was not trespassing. Zimmerman was not in the acting capacity of a guard that night.
If either of these were different, the prosecution could probably never attempt to bring this to trial.
You do understand don't you, that the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial are three separate branches of government, right?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
