Reply With Quote
So your claim was false.
Sloppy work, dan.
After all those years of your research....
So what? WTC 7 fell because it was having loss issues after 1 and 2 fell?
So your claim was false.
Sloppy work, dan.
After all those years of your research....
Why would anyone make a conclusion on a event that hasn't been properly investigated on?
Unlike you I seek the facts before I spew unproven scenarios.
Why wouldn't they?
You aren't a lawyer in court.
You never looked up any of the facts that are already out there. Otherwise you'd know how full of your YouTubes are.Unlike you I seek the facts before I spew unproven scenarios.
This ChumpDumper seems a tad bit hostile so I may return later after you get relived from the shared cubicle.
I would rather debate with another ChumpDumper shill.
With that said did anyone ever explain why WTC7 came down so fast?
Won't matter, you'll never say anything different from the accepted narrative happened because you know it's true.
Yes. Anyone actually searching for the truth would have known that.With that said did anyone ever explain why WTC7 came down so fast?
93 pages of a thread where chump has asked the same question to you clowns hundreds of times and we haven't seen a single one of you answer it....my theory is that none of you are intelligent enough to come up with what you think happened. In fact, conspiracy theories lend themselves to stupid people because it allows you to never have to learn actual facts, you just make up stuff in your head and accept it as truth....sort of like my 4 year old.
You write like a 4 year old...Chumpy might as well be asking if God really exists....90% of Americans will say yes, but have no proof....ask a wing-nut if Obama is Kenyan, a socialist, or after your guns and most will say yes....again no proof...
I'm more interested how the status quo on 911 became so anti scientific-method...It's OK to be anti-science if it works in your favor...is that the new status quo?
Huh?
I'm asking you what you think really happened on 9/11.
It's a simple question.
You've "researched" it for 12 years.
If I wanted a stupid YouTube or an idiotic meme, I would have asked for that.
lol the 9/11 truthers thinking that their youtube videos and infowars reports are objective research is a hilarious display of confirmation bias
None of the YouTube memers here have done any research.
You post that as if you actually have any evidence.
You don't.
Isn't that the whole idea?
Your whole idea is to not do research and just post YouTubes you haven't even watched, yes.
you concluded that 9/11 was an inside job and stopped there.
If it was an inside job, someone needs to go to prison/chair.
Who in your opinion should that someone (s) be?
Obama!
at SA210 pretending like he didn't come to the conclusion that the Boston Bombings were set up by the government, then work his way back from there. His desperate attempts to find anything that supported his asinine, paranoid beliefs were embarrassing.
The YouTube videos are just to show we are not alone in questioning what "really" went on durring 9/11
Most of the YouTube videos you and your narrow minded pals in here seem to dislike are never debunked or addressed.
When you and your misguided tea party clan decide to post some real evidence that I am off base only then can we move forward in this discussion.
Um, mouse -- that is the whole point of this thread. Read all the links and watch all the videos in the OP. Then tell us what you think really happened on 9/11.
The ball has always been in your court.
Do some real research for a change.
None of you wannabe conspiracy theorist have done even the most basic research
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
