Reply With Quote
Sports doesn't take statistics to win games, it takes heart.
Kawhi Leonard and Manu Ginobili each missed a free throw down the stretch, either of which would have iced the game. Kawhi shot 82.5% from the FT line this season, while Manu shot 79.6%. The probability that both players would miss a free throw is only 4.0425%, meaning that the Spurs' chances of winning this game was 95.9575%.
Sports doesn't take statistics to win games, it takes heart.
Interesting, but you don't account for the two rebounds the Spurs missed. I would like to see some statistical odds that they fail to make either defensive board, and miss both those free throws. The odds have to be less than 1%.
As if it didn't hurt enough already b
Impossible odds come up for us 90 percent of the time.
This is what it is like being a Spurs fan.
Games are not won with a calculator..
I thought I'd never feel worse than losing my six figure suicide pool (under 5% of entries left) when Detroit had like a 98% chance of beating Andrew Luck and the Colts this past year.
Can't attach a price to tonight though. If you give Lebron two shots at it, he'll come through in the clutch eventually. And friggen Ray Allen. Can he please retire?
Pop ed up 100 %
I blame those missed rebounds after James bricks....
And Pop surely overcoached this one.
God hates the Spurs. It's the only logical explanation for all of this.
U have to account for the made freethrows as well (I think one by KL and 3 by Manu). e.g. Manu's 3/4 is pretty much his 79.6%.Kawhi Leonard and Manu Ginobili each missed a free throw down the stretch, either of which would have iced the game. Kawhi shot 82.5% from the FT line this season, while Manu shot 79.6%. The probability that both players would miss a free throw is only 4.0425%, meaning that the Spurs' chances of winning this game was 95.9575%.
Gambler's Fallacy. Each of Manu's individual free throws is a separate event, whose probability of going in is independent of other events that preceded it.
Feel bad for Leonard, but ...damn
So you just take out 2 missed FT's (out of 6) and assume that they go in, without accounting for the other?
If so: You can also say Bron missed 15 shots and usally makes 49%...We got lucky he didn't make 7 more adn we lose by 14 in regulation.
Kick a man when he's down, why dontcha?
God hates the bobcats not the spurs
I recommend you do some reading on Logic so you can understand why this statement is fallacious.
http://www.nizkor.org/features/falla...s-fallacy.html
I know what your trying to tell me without reading this (it's not like I didn't study this ^^). But can you please explain whats the difference between your statement and my Bron counter statement?
I'm just saying:
There is a 50,4% chance Manu makes 3FT's.
And there is a 41,6% chance Manu makes 3 and KL makes one.
That said: We had a pretty big chance (58,4) do not make one of the made FT's.
Taking the 6 FT's the usal outcome probalby would be one more make (since Manu is at about his %tage and KL is below), but the 96% are very falseleading.
@WagerMinds 5h
The Heat, down by 5 with just :28 remaining, are now +5000 to win the game outright. $100 bet wins you $5,000. Any takers?
Actually, the probability of each missing one given those individual probabilities is 9.38%. Calculated as follows:Kawhi Leonard and Manu Ginobili each missed a free throw down the stretch, either of which would have iced the game. Kawhi shot 82.5% from the FT line this season, while Manu shot 79.6%. The probability that both players would miss a free throw is only 4.0425%, meaning that the Spurs' chances of winning this game was 95.9575%.
Ptot = [2C1*p1*(1-p1)][2c1*p2*(1-p2)] = [(2)(0.825)(0.175)][(2)(0.796)(0.204)]
2C1 is the combination of 2 things taken 1 at a time, pn is the probability of a successful free throw for person n. Product of 2 binomial distributions.
Still a small chance of losing, but a 90% chance is normally not betting odds, statistically speaking.
Manu should have at least focused on hitting his free throws. He played a pretty bad game. The Spurs didn't take advantage enough of the Heat sticking to Danny Green. They should have allowed Manu to create more stuff knowing the help wouldn't come. It's on Pop to make the adjustments now. He just chocked the game away. Just one more rebound. Like Riley says no rebounds no rings.
Clearly the OP does not have a PHD in math
Not to mention tbh that somehow a loose rebound bounces around and lands in the hand of the best 3 point shooter of all time lol
This fuggin game
Each miss one, in this case, means each miss at least one. Basically he should have summed all these up (assume q=1-p):
1) Prob of each player missing exactly 1 FT (your calculation above): 2*2*p1q1p2q2
2) Prob of only one player missing 2FT = q1q1p2p2 + p1p1q2q2
3) Prob of one player missing 2 FT and the other missing 1FT: 2*q1q1p2q2 + 2*p1q1q2q2
4) Prob of both players missing all their free throws : q1q1q2q2
CORRECTION: 1, 3, 4 summed up give probability for each player misses at least one. Adding 2 gives the real desired probability of "at least 2 free throws missed"
Last edited by Kobulingam; 06-19-2013 at 08:29 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
