Which would be totally unfair.
I hate the media and fans obsession with "clutch." This belief that the only plays that matter come in the final moments of a game and are the plays that define a player's legacy. If the Spurs held on in Game 6, Tony Parker's abysmal game would've been forgotten because of the two clutch shots he hit. If he simply played up to par, the Spurs are winning by double digits and there would be no opportunity for a "clutch moment." Furthermore, the Spurs didn't lose that game in the final seconds or even at the line, they lost in the opening of the 4th quarter when Popovich had one of his Frankenstein lineups on the floor and the Heat went on a quick 7-0 run.
A basketball game is a series of interconnected events, one influencing another, and not a collection of individual moments that "mean more" than any others, because ultimately, points scored in the last seconds count just as much as points scored in the 1st quarter.
It's endemic of the highlight culture that sports have been reduced to post-Jordan, appealing to the human tendency toward selective memory.
Duncan was 8-16 from the field and perfect from the line before the missed chip and tip. To respond like that after Game 6 is the definition of "clutch." He just happened to miss at the wrong moment in time.
/rant about "clutch"