How do you figure?
I thought FWD put it succinctly enough: this isn't about race, it's about socioeconomic conditions. It just so happens that those in minorities largely are at the bottom of the socioeconomic ladder.
So stereotyping minorities as stupid, helpless, and dependent on government is okay and justified?
How do you figure?
I thought FWD put it succinctly enough: this isn't about race, it's about socioeconomic conditions. It just so happens that those in minorities largely are at the bottom of the socioeconomic ladder.
And?
If Asian students are outperforming other students, so be it. Unless you think that Asian students come from some "privaledged" background that gives them an unfair advantage. Lol.
from questioning in SCOTUS today, sounds like the JINOs are gonna kill affirmative action.
white persecution complex
Supreme Court justices skeptical of affirmative action for college
http://touch.latimes.com/#section/40.../p2p-72826423/
The Asians have a great work ethic, but they are certainly not coming from the background of blacks/hispanics. Generally speaking, they are more privileged. Many of the asians are also international students, especially from China which means they're likely to be only children and their parents are likely to be affluent enough to pay for their school and test prep... in addition to being affluent enough to send their child oversees to go to school.
But you're deliberately missing my point anyway...
I'm getting pretty tired of this cop-out.they are certainly not coming from the background of blacks/hispanics
So why aren't underrepresented minorities making it on their own without AA or some other form of it? Are they just lazy/dumb?
Are you saying it doesn't happen?
What evidence do you have?
If the Asian kid lives in the same neighborhood and goes to the same school, are they more affluent?
I'm with Justice Roberts on this one; the best way to end racial discrimination is to end racial discrimination.
You could argue that it's "fair" in the sense that people voted in people to make those laws.![]()
My previous reference to what happened at UCLA when AA was eliminated.
We win!!!
http://www.utexas.edu/know/2013/06/2...her-ut-austin/
Supreme Court punted! Blue team wins again! If an actual decision had been reached, we would have most certainly lost. Now, however, the case goes back to the appellate court where UT will kick ass and win again.
In yo face!
Just noticed this comment, but I will dignify your stupid question with a rhetorical question. How many asians do you see living in the neighborhoods of blacks/hispanics?
lol tiny wedge issues like affirmative action fake liberals focus on
Nah, it's an actual policy issue -- especially important here in Texas with the number of minorities.
It's an issue like gay marriage that Obama uses to distract liberals from his track record on economic and foreign policy. Granted, both sides of the aisle use it as a wedge issue. It's an effective tool for Republicans to convince poor white people other minorities are why their lives suck.
So.
The supreme court supports racism. The belief that minorities need help because they can't compete on a level playing field is racism...
The playing field is not level without affirmative action -- even then it's fair from perfect.
They overturned a big part of the voting rights act today. lol.
the VRA gutting is much more important to VRWC SCOTUS than affirmative action, because of its electoral impact in aiding gerrymandering, voter suppression, etc, esp in purple states. Won't help much in red states, they're ed up red already.
I can't believe it's been two whole years since it was ruled on.
Sadly, it's going back to the Supreme Court and this time AA may go down.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)