How To Convert An Atheist To Christianity

[Avante]

But you're going to call atheists idiots any way.

Because you're an idoit.

Come over here ya little , closer, closer...WHAM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Now pick your boney little ass up and get the out of here.

[Blake]

Yah, that really didn't show me.

Because you're an idoit

[Avante]

Yah, that really didn't show me.

Because you're an idoit

For someone who has proven they don't know you sure have a big ing mouth.

[mouse]

How did this creator/designer you believe in come into existence himself?

You see there was a huge explosion from nothing. and if your brain dead enough to not only believe that crap but to actually have the balls to write a book?







And the weird is.... the brain dead fools that actually spent money on that piece of $hit book?

I take that back........if your sells then more power to you in fact I like this guy he is the Wild Cobra of the book TRolls



I give him his props.

[ChumpDumper]

Come over here ya little , closer, closer...WHAM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Now pick your boney little ass up and get the out of here.

Did you just play act like you were physically striking another poster?

Very unmodlike meltdown tbh.

[Blake]

For someone who has proven they don't know you sure have a big ing mouth.

I've proven I know more about the number of atheists in the world than you and your bigger mouth.

[Avante]

I've proven I know more about the number of atheists in the world than you and your bigger mouth.

Where did I ever mention atheists in the world, try...America...ok?

[Blake]

Where did I ever mention atheists in the world, try...America...ok?

ah, right.

I've proven I know more about the number of atheists in America than you and your bigger mouth.

[RandomGuy]

Let them start ing around with the occult and devil worship...they will start calling on god for help in no time. They will find out quick the spirit world does exist...the difference with god is he doesn't manifest himself in such wicked ways.

If you don't believe in the magic man in the sky, the magic man under the ground doesn't make sense either. Nor do magic spirits.

Sorry. Nice stories from our species' youth, that we will happily cast aside.

[RandomGuy]

It's all about doing what's best for you, what others say about it means nothing. That's just them doing what's best for them. No different that favorite color, favorite beer. Who would argue or debate red vs blue? Coors vs Bud, it's all about personal opinion. Trying to convince anyone your opinion is the one that matters will never work. So keep your belliefs to your yourself unless asked about them and then respect others beliefs.

That is actually the point.

Truth matters.

The only real way to get to the truth is evidence.

Either there is a magic unicorn in the box or there is not. I could believe all day that there is a magic horned equine there, or that Santa will bring me loot, but my belief does not have any bearing on the truth of magic box unicorns or Santa.

We learn about things based on that. There is no evidence for some god/God/gods creating the universe and/or us.

You can either have your opinion based on evidence or not. "Faith" is an excuse people use when they don't have a good reason to believe in something.

[RandomGuy]

I don't believe in God. I 've said that many times. I said I believe in a creator, I just use God because it's easier.

Now disprove the existence of a creator something Einstein did believe in. That's why he wasn't an atheist.

So you believe all this just happened by chance......prove that.

Fallacy: Burden of Proof

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Includes: Appeal to Ignorance ("Ad Ignorantiam")

Description of Burden of Proof
Burden of Proof is a fallacy in which the burden of proof is placed on the wrong side. Another version occurs when a lack of evidence for side A is taken to be evidence for side B in cases in which the burden of proof actually rests on side B. A common name for this is an Appeal to Ignorance. This sort of reasoning typically has the following form:


Claim X is presented by side A and the burden of proof actually rests on side B.
Side B claims that X is false because there is no proof for X.

http://www.nizkor.org/features/falla...-of-proof.html

"God exists"

"I don't think there is evidence to prove that."

"Oh yeah, prove that he does not exist!"

Do you base all of your opinions and world view on flawed logic, or just this one thing?

[redzero]

Do you base all of your opinions and world view on flawed logic, or just this one thing?

Read the rest of the thread and you'll see almost every post of his contains a logical fallacy.

[.G.]

The devil? People still believe in such a concept?

[Heath Ledger]

Why won't god heal amputees?

[Koolaid_Man]

I can't believe yall still talking bout this ...

[Avante]

That is actually the point.

Truth matters.

The only real way to get to the truth is evidence.

Either there is a magic unicorn in the box or there is not. I could believe all day that there is a magic horned equine there, or that Santa will bring me loot, but my belief does not have any bearing on the truth of magic box unicorns or Santa.

We learn about things based on that. There is no evidence for some god/God/gods creating the universe and/or us.

You can either have your opinion based on evidence or not. "Faith" is an excuse people use when they don't have a good reason to believe in something.

Do we have the cell phone today? Sure, so how come we didn't have the cell phone a 1000, 500, 100, years ago?

[silverblk mystix]

That is actually the point.

Truth matters.

The only real way to get to the truth is evidence.

Do you think this also applies to the question of a god - and how can this be when no one knows what a god is? How do you apply this logic on an absolute mystery? (Serious question)


Either there is a magic unicorn in the box or there is not. I could believe all day that there is a magic horned equine there, or that Santa will bring me loot, but my belief does not have any bearing on the truth of magic box unicorns or Santa.

We learn about things based on that. There is no evidence for some god/God/gods creating the universe and/or us.

You can either have your opinion based on evidence or not. "Faith" is an excuse people use when they don't have a good reason to believe in something.

Isn't it convenient that science assigns the "burden of proof" on the other side so they never have to prove that a god does in fact exist?

[Blake]

Do we have the cell phone today? Sure, so how come we didn't have the cell phone a 1000, 500, 100, years ago?

wtf

[Blake]

Isn't it convenient that science assigns the "burden of proof" on the other side so they never have to prove that a god does in fact exist?

It's not science, it's simple logic that assigns burden of proof to the believer, dumbass.

[silverblk mystix]

It's not science, it's simple logic that assigns burden of proof to the believer, dumbass.

Yes, I remember freshman 101 - but the issue is that you are applying this same thing to something completely different. If you are talking about widgets or some other - of course this computes...

Trying to apply this same logic to an absolute mystery is like trying to figure out a math problem by reading lines of shakepeare. Does not compute. Never has. Never will.

Dumbass. (since this is your preferred way to answer/respond to serious questions)

[Avante]

wtf

It's not obvious?

[Blake]

Yes, I remember freshman 101 - but the issue is that you are applying this same thing to something completely different. If you are talking about widgets or some other - of course this computes...

Trying to apply this same logic to an absolute mystery is like trying to figure out a math problem by reading lines of shakepeare. Does not compute. Never has. Never will.

That attempt at a metaphor is terrible. You're lying if you claim you took freshman logic.

Dumbass. (since this is your preferred way to answer/respond to serious questions)

It's my preferred way of saying you're seriously dumb because you repeatedly fail to grasp simple logic that is being explained to you by a number of different posters.

And you're an emotionally weak labeler that can't even live up to his own rules of enlightened living and labeling.

[Blake]

It's not obvious?

You're obviously a dumbass like SBM.

I'm sure someone else with more patience than I have will be here shortly to explain why your cell phone question is ridiculously stupid.

[Avante]

You're obviously a dumbass like SBM.

I'm sure someone else with more patience than me will be here shortly to explain why your cell phone question is ridiculously stupid.

Do I really have to explain it to you?

[silverblk mystix]

That attempt at a metaphor is terrible. You're lying if you claim you took freshman logic.



It's my preferred way of saying you're seriously dumb because you repeatedly fail to grasp simple logic that is being explained to you by a number of different posters.

And you're an emotionally weak labeler that can't even live up to his own rules of enlightened living and labeling.

Well, you are obviously still butthurt and angry so when you'd like to learn something about trying to apply logic to an absolute mystery - let me know.

If you'd rather be your same angry name-caller and labeler - carry on.