Those within the organization who actually have knowledge of the situation would tell you Ibaka was absolutely not a choice - he just inked a deal first. YOu have to understand Presti is very methodical in his approach, like it or not. He has a very methodical approach and sticks to it. However, the idea that he chose Ibaka over Harden is simply 100% inaccurate. He went into negotiations wanting both players, obviously. This was not a situation where he said..ok, I'm going to choose which player I value more, do whatever it takes to sign that guy, and deal with player #2 after that. That is an approach some GMs would take and that's just a difference in business practices. I truly believe Presti had a number on both guys, he was going to offer that figure to both players, timing being irrelevent, and see what happened. Call it stubborn if you will. That's just the way Presti is. He has financial considerations in running the franchise and I know it's easy for fans to scoff at a few million bucks and consider it insignificant to an NBA franchise, but he's a businessman and he puts pretty strict limitations on his contract negotiations. I understand the argument that Presti was $X away from inking Harden and it could've resulted in a much different outcome for OKC last year and the upcoming few years and that shipping Harden out to save this amount of money was stupid - I don't disagree with that. I do think it was a bad trade, but I do also have some respect for the way Presti operates, some sort of appreciation for the difficulty in juggling financial considerations which are much more complex than most of us realize, and sticking to his guns. I didn't like the outcome, but I can respect the way he operates.