Reply With Quote
that song is amazing, fam. lil jon and usher made some hit records in the early 00's
They should of just arrested him for playing that old ass song
that song is amazing, fam. lil jon and usher made some hit records in the early 00's
So did nelly
cop killers carry on....
okay.....
you don't listen to music made prior to 2013, doggie?
The video doesn't tell the whole story….
Rosby seemed to be testing boundaries of Hawthorne police officers who were involved in the SWAT standoff, Martinez said.
"It was kind of like he was seeing how far he could go and get away with it," Martinez said. "He was asking where's the black cops and the Hispanic cops? Why there's only one ethnicity there. Little things like that."
Police said they arrested Rosby because he was coming too close to officers during the standoff and blaring music from his car.
http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/lo...214103031.html
My , I am well involved into the music scene prior today. Mostly hip hop but not only.
I'm saying just cause someone was hot for a bit a while ago doesn't mean you can jam them and/or that track now.
Its ok for Nas
Not Lil John
Its ok for a dipset track
Not Lovers and friends
What about Naughty by Nature? I was jamming that last night lol.
What about 'I wanna rock with you' by michael jackson?
Jammin naughty by nature in your car? Meh, it was a tuesday. I'm cool with that.
MJ is the GOAT. No restrictions on him or his music imho.
I told you guys this guy stunk. But you faygo drinking gots had to defend him.
A witness has come forward to reveal that the cop who shot an innocent dog this week has a long history of violence and even shot and killed a man with down syndrome when he was a rookie.By JG VibesPhoto: Youtube
Intellihub.com
July 2, 2013
As we reported yesterday, a Hawthorne police officer shot a not so violent looking dog in front of several people filming the police, as they raided a house with a gang of officers, with several police cars nearby.
Details about this officers past have now surfaced showing a history of violence. One situation has even been described where this officer killed a man with down syndrome as a rookie.
Daniel Saulmon wrote in the description of this recording that:
You can hear him in this recording doing what he can to sweet talk me out of details in an attempt to find information to protect his fellow officers. Once I give him every detail of information I have, he is through with me.
He steals my audio recorder and charges me with 2 felony counts of eavesdropping…632 pc If recording the police was a crime, I would have more counts against me then 2. But its not a crime, and I still will gladly go to jail for it, because as a viewer commented, it seems to flesh out corrupt officers who seek to retaliate against innocent people for no lawful reason. Officers who may not be fit for police work.
No wonder I have seen lies in the media, Swain is the “bold faced liar” writing those stories. I asked him to do something positive recently after a cyclist was killed by another department. I suggested his department lead the way and create policy before they kill someone too.
He said, “naah, I like my officers to have discretion rather then a policy saying what to do.”
That is not surprising, as a Rookie Swain killed a re ed guy who was well known to the department…he allegedly had a screwdriver in his hand. Wouldn’t want good old policy around to spoil good times now would we Swain.
At any rate, this recording is at least 7 years old, but based on my recent arrest on 11-9-2012, the only thing that has changed are a few names. Couple guys retired, like Jester, and Royer.
They did return my video camera and bicycle some 9 days after I was bailed out of jail. Interesting that those items were only kept as “evidence” for about 15 days this time before they returned them.
This is not something that only happened to me by the way. Many people around the country have been charged with the crime of eavesdropping for trying to file a complaint with a recorder. It is a well known fact that it is illegal to do so, arrest that is not record.
You can always record police, no matter what they say to the contrary. If they are doing nothing wrong, they have nothing to hide, right?
damn, its like that punk ass cop/guard on the green mileI told you guys this guy stunk. But you faygo drinking gots had to defend him.
A witness has come forward to reveal that the cop who shot an innocent dog this week has a long history of violence and even shot and killed a man with down syndrome when he was a rookie.
By JG VibesPhoto: Youtube
Intellihub.com
July 2, 2013
As we reported yesterday, a Hawthorne police officer shot a not so violent looking dog in front of several people filming the police, as they raided a house with a gang of officers, with several police cars nearby.
Details about this officers past have now surfaced showing a history of violence. One situation has even been described where this officer killed a man with down syndrome as a rookie.
Daniel Saulmon wrote in the description of this recording that:You can hear him in this recording doing what he can to sweet talk me out of details in an attempt to find information to protect his fellow officers. Once I give him every detail of information I have, he is through with me.
He steals my audio recorder and charges me with 2 felony counts of eavesdropping…632 pc If recording the police was a crime, I would have more counts against me then 2. But its not a crime, and I still will gladly go to jail for it, because as a viewer commented, it seems to flesh out corrupt officers who seek to retaliate against innocent people for no lawful reason. Officers who may not be fit for police work.
No wonder I have seen lies in the media, Swain is the “bold faced liar” writing those stories. I asked him to do something positive recently after a cyclist was killed by another department. I suggested his department lead the way and create policy before they kill someone too.
He said, “naah, I like my officers to have discretion rather then a policy saying what to do.”
That is not surprising, as a Rookie Swain killed a re ed guy who was well known to the department…he allegedly had a screwdriver in his hand. Wouldn’t want good old policy around to spoil good times now would we Swain.
At any rate, this recording is at least 7 years old, but based on my recent arrest on 11-9-2012, the only thing that has changed are a few names. Couple guys retired, like Jester, and Royer.
They did return my video camera and bicycle some 9 days after I was bailed out of jail. Interesting that those items were only kept as “evidence” for about 15 days this time before they returned them.
This is not something that only happened to me by the way. Many people around the country have been charged with the crime of eavesdropping for trying to file a complaint with a recorder. It is a well known fact that it is illegal to do so, arrest that is not record.
You can always record police, no matter what they say to the contrary. If they are doing nothing wrong, they have nothing to hide, right?
Exactly. I'm not saying all cops are bad, just this particular guy. KILL HIM.
Btw, a few weeks ago, I coincedentally saw a video of a rottweiler attacking a cop. The rott actually went in for the kill, and the cop calmly put his foot out, grabbed his taser and tasered it. It yelped and ran the other way, it was sad to see but it was NECCESARY. The cop was in the right, in this case this is VERY wrong. Only pussies and assholes can justify this type of dictatorship, I think it's a sheeps mentality to wish that cops were always in the right.
post the video and stfu you crybaby ass, animal lovin ass, dress my puppy up in sweaters ass
Post the video you saw a few weeks ago lol
Well, apparently the cop shot the wrong suspect. He should have shot this moron instead.
This is one of those cases were an incompetent ass mother er like that cop is given a badge and a gun. ing pussy, tbh.I told you guys this guy stunk. But you faygo drinking gots had to defend him.
A witness has come forward to reveal that the cop who shot an innocent dog this week has a long history of violence and even shot and killed a man with down syndrome when he was a rookie.
By JG VibesPhoto: Youtube
Intellihub.com
July 2, 2013
As we reported yesterday, a Hawthorne police officer shot a not so violent looking dog in front of several people filming the police, as they raided a house with a gang of officers, with several police cars nearby.
Details about this officers past have now surfaced showing a history of violence. One situation has even been described where this officer killed a man with down syndrome as a rookie.
Daniel Saulmon wrote in the description of this recording that:You can hear him in this recording doing what he can to sweet talk me out of details in an attempt to find information to protect his fellow officers. Once I give him every detail of information I have, he is through with me.
He steals my audio recorder and charges me with 2 felony counts of eavesdropping…632 pc If recording the police was a crime, I would have more counts against me then 2. But its not a crime, and I still will gladly go to jail for it, because as a viewer commented, it seems to flesh out corrupt officers who seek to retaliate against innocent people for no lawful reason. Officers who may not be fit for police work.
No wonder I have seen lies in the media, Swain is the “bold faced liar” writing those stories. I asked him to do something positive recently after a cyclist was killed by another department. I suggested his department lead the way and create policy before they kill someone too.
He said, “naah, I like my officers to have discretion rather then a policy saying what to do.”
That is not surprising, as a Rookie Swain killed a re ed guy who was well known to the department…he allegedly had a screwdriver in his hand. Wouldn’t want good old policy around to spoil good times now would we Swain.
At any rate, this recording is at least 7 years old, but based on my recent arrest on 11-9-2012, the only thing that has changed are a few names. Couple guys retired, like Jester, and Royer.
They did return my video camera and bicycle some 9 days after I was bailed out of jail. Interesting that those items were only kept as “evidence” for about 15 days this time before they returned them.
This is not something that only happened to me by the way. Many people around the country have been charged with the crime of eavesdropping for trying to file a complaint with a recorder. It is a well known fact that it is illegal to do so, arrest that is not record.
You can always record police, no matter what they say to the contrary. If they are doing nothing wrong, they have nothing to hide, right?
http://www.dailytech.com/California+...ticle29272.htm
More evidence that shows how HPD (the same one in the video in the OP) likes to abuse their power just because they have a ing badge and a gun.
"If you don't give me your ID, then you're going to jail."
That's what a California cop, Officer Gabriel "Gabe" Lira, tells a man who is videotaping a routine traffic stop. For Daniel J. Saulmon who lives in Hawethorne, a suburb of Los Angeles west of Compton, he was simply doing his citizens duty. After all, his taxes help fund the Hawethorne Police Department, so why shouldn't he be allowed to record video of police in public on the job, in order to ensure that they do not abuse their citizen-entrusted power?
I. Show Some ID, Bud
Unfortunately, the Hawethorne Police Department's police officers didn't feel they owed the taxpayer anything.
Instead they arrest him (as the tape clearly shows) for failing to produce ID. The only problem? There is no law in California banning recording of on-duty cops and there is no law that requires Californians to produce papers to cops. And in states where there are such laws, the requirement is that the individual be suspected of committing a crime.
Initially the HPD tried to charge the citizen with resisting, delaying and obstructing an officer -- an offense punishable for up to $1,000 USD in fines and a year in jail. They also cited him fornot having reflectors on his bike pedals (punishable with a fine of up to $250 USD).
Ultimately both charges were dropped. Mr. Saulmon's video, ironically, offered vindication by showing the officer improperly demanded his identification. It also showed he was standing a good distance away from the investigation site, and hence was not obstructing.
The extra irony is that the HPD officers should definitely have known better than to pick on Mr. Saulmon. Keenly aware of his rights, he regularly records local arrests. In 2005 he was arrested in a similar situation for eavesdropping/wiretapping. The charges were eventually dropped, and the HPD paid him a settlement of $25,000 USD for the wrongful arrest.
Ridiculous....lets hang these mother ers
"What am I under arrest for?" ... "I don't know what have you been doing?"
You just haven't been to Hawthorne, Ca.
It took until page 3 for somebody to look at this rationally, and it was sbm of all people.
It took until page 3 for somebody to look at this rationally, and it was sbm of all people.
WTF are you laughing at?
I am the king of rationality!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
