Reply With Quote
Creepn believed DeeDee...
Zimmerman’s defense tries to Hammer Home the Wimp Factor…
George Zimmerman’s defense team continued Wednesday to play up the wimp factor, calling yet another witness to reinforce their claim that the pudgy neighborhood watch volunteer was "by no stretch of the imagination" a match for Trayvon Martin in their fight before Zimmerman shot and killed the teen in a gated Florida community last year.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/07/10...ase-wednesday/
Creepn believed DeeDee...
Damn the defense attorneys are destroying the prosecution!
The mannequin was initially introduced by prosecutor John Guy during cross-examination of defense witness Dennis Root, a former law enforcement officer who testified as an expert on defensive use of force. Guy used it to show how, if Martin were straddling Zimmerman, he would have had difficulty reaching for a gun holstered at his waist.
After Guy wrapped up his round of questioning, lead defense attorney Mark O'Mara stepped up.
"May I use your doll?" asked O'Mara.
O'Mara straddled the dummy on the floor in front of the witness stand, grabbed it by the shoulders and drove its head into the floor repeatedly.
"Would the injuries on Mr. Zimmerman, the back of his head, be consistent with someone doing this on cement?" asked O'Mara as he slammed the flopping mannequin's head into the floor.
"I don't think so," replied Root.
"How about this?" asked O'Mara, continuing to bash the life-sized dummy against the floor, but placing its arm against his shoulder, as if it were resisting. "How about someone resisting the attack? Could that have come from if someone was resisting me pushing down like this?"
Root responded, "I believe so."
CC believes Zimmerman...Creepn believed DeeDee...
The jury will agree with CCCC believes Zimmerman...
/creepn
LMAO at West begging Zimmerman not to take the stand and testify.
You see that CC? Lawyers so afraid to let Zimmerman take the stand and *gasps* tell the truth.
I think what he is afraid of is Zimmerman exposing himself as a creepy loser…
The defense has so thoroughly destroyed the prosecutions case that Zimmerman would be an idiot to testify now and open himself up to possibly getting tripped up on cross.
Did you not think i was referring to them as well? They hope he gets found innocent so the guy gets lynch mobbed.
Just sad tbh. One guy makes an irresponsible decision and we have to muddy things up the way we have.
"One guy makes an irresponsible decision"
the one who bought Skittles?
or
the one who murdered him?
Anybody find the street sign that Z lied about, saying he got out of his truck ONLY to read the mythical sign, NOT to stalk M on foot?
Could be the one that attacked the guy with the gun.
Don't say "they". I never said that.
Zimmerman just declined to testify.
Coward.
smart. no need to. Prosecution hasn't proven their case.
Judge Nelson declined a 2nd time to acquit Zimmerman saying that evidence provided supported 2nd degree murder.
pffft. That's not what she said.
What is somewhat stunning about this case is that each person's opinion of what happened is just that, an opinion. That will include, frankly, the members of the jury. It seems to me that the decision they make might very well boil down to who they think was yelling "help". That will boil down to which relative was more convincing, because the "experts" are at a loss. I don't know what happened that evening, whether this was murder, or self defense, and none of you do either. The only person who knows beyond any doubt is on trial.
The evidence presented by the prosecution has been limited. There is no smoking gun, no great eyewitness or CSI type revelation. They have presented their opinion of the events. Shouldn't be enough to convict. Honestly won't surprise me if it is.
LMAO! Caught the gym witness in a bold face lie! He was asked if he was marketing Zimmerman for his self-defense classes to which he replies," Absolutely not!"
Link to advertisment page: https://twitter.com/TonyPipitone/sta...858049/photo/1
Twunt judge rules Traybonz texts are inadmissable.
Fraid of the truth.
The judge was out of line. Defense was still making its case. The judge properly asked Zimmerman after Zimmerman Sr. testified and the defense said they would call no more witnesses. West was right to object and I have no doubt, even though this issue will not be appealed that an appeals court would indicate that the judge should wait to question the defendent until the close of all other witnesses in the defense. Any one sentence in a testimony could change the need for him to testify and then her questions to Zimmerman become completly unnecessary. It was bad form by the judge, sloppy in my opnion and I would have raised the same objection.
A young mother who lived in the gated community where Zimmerman shot Martin told jurors Wednesday the neighborhood watch volunteer helped comfort her after a home invasion by two young men left her frightened.
Olivia Bertalan said Zimmerman supplied her with a new lock for her sliding door and offered to open his own home to her after the incident, which happened about six months before Zimmerman’s fateful confrontation with Martin,. Although she said the two invaders were African-Americans in their late teens, there was no suggestion that Martin was involved. The testimony was instead apparently presented to show how seriously Zimmerman took his role as a community protector.
Powerful testimony to a jury full of women.
Actually, since those were African American teens I would think this could actually help the prosecution; goes to both mindset and motive of GZ.
Shocking. She actually called one for the defense.
This is a direct quote from an article without sourcing. Poor form but good content.
This is typical emotional nonsense from the Zimmerman Defense Corps of Guero and Whitey.
This is actual analysis. This speaks to concepts of law and how the issues raised in the article apply. Taking facts and events and applying them.
That is one thing that I get from ZDCGW, this is completely emotional from them. You get like:
slam dunk
powerful
owned
destroy
shredded
What you don't get is any sort of real analysis but instead emotional hyperbole. That just tells me that ZDCGW is basing their conclusions on an emotional and not analytical reasoning. They are to analysis as Rick Perry is to politics.
The closest I get to it not being so is CC claiming "by all accounts" of "independent lawyers" or other similar takes. Not only is the notion of "all" wrong but it speaks directly to the first quote in my sig. He also has a penchant for making claims that his emotional claims are justified but then expects you to look it up.
All in all it's hard to take the ZDCGW seriously.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
