Reply With Quote
More often than not, the 17 year old would be tried as a teen and not as an adult.
He's a great attorney though.
More often than not, the 17 year old would be tried as a teen and not as an adult.
If you continue to bring logic to the forum I will have to report you to the moderators…
State closers trying to dissuade jurors by belittling Omamas charts proving 4 minutes between cell phone calls. Lame.
"I don't have any charts or videos" while wrinklilng up his face.
Translation: I don't have for evidence.
I think jury chicks see thru it.
More often than not, it depends on the crime.
when is the verdict coming/
lol black people be salty if not guilty
I missed this gem of a post. You're ing delusional.
I can agree with some of that. However, I have seen no lynch mob comments in favor of avenging Zimmerman if he's convicted.
Thank you for the clarification. I didn't know he described someone in his late teens.
just looked at this trial for the first time. george walking into courtroom..........geez that is one fat mofo.
hope he walks. don't want to pay for all the food.
"great bodily harm" lol
Go to storm front.
Zimmerman Trial: 'The Sound of Silence'
The most dramatic moment yet of the George Zimmerman trial yet occurred during the defense's closing argument Friday morning, when attorney Mark O'Mara paused for four minutes to illustrate a long gap in the prosecution's timeline of events.
The television cameras zoomed in on the digital clock, and panned slowly across the stony faces of the spectators as O'Mara walked back to his table, conferred with counsel, checked his papers, then--after what seemed an eternity--returned to continue his argument to the jury.
In case you weren't watching live, those four minutes of silence were longer than the original "Sound of Silence" by Simon and Garfunkel, which might seem like a fairly complicated tune but only clocks in at 3:05.
Those four minutes of eerie silence in the court were a powerful illustration--and experience--of what reasonable doubt means in the defense's theory of the case.
If prosecutors could not explain what Trayvon Martin was doing for four minutes instead of walking home--or running, as state witness Rachel Jeantel testified--how could they claim that Zimmerman had set out to kill Martin? If he felt threatened, why didn't he leave? And wasn't it more likely that Martin had lain in wait for Zimmerman and started a confrontation?
O'Mara's argument continued, providing jurors with an account of events from start to finish--which, oddly, the prosecution had failed to do in its closing argument, preferring to focus on Zimmerman's credibility.
The defense stressed the important of the "reasonable doubt" standard, noting that even if the jury thought it was "highly unlikely" that Zimmerman acted in self-defense, that was not enough to convict him.
Video at link.
http://www.breitbart.com/InstaBlog/2...und-of-Silence
Complaining about racism because of what you read on Stormfront is like complaining about the smell because you decided to go wallow in .
I had to watch the closing arguments because the spectacle of prosecutors trying to argue for a verdict when they have zero evidence, they know they have zero evidence, they know they are standing there only because some lady wanted to make sure she could get re-elected without opposition, and yet they're still giving it the old college try anyway with a whole bunch of arm-waving, is compelling in a farcical sort of way.
Regardless of the verdict, the farce will continue, and it will all be hilarious.
s bag Z's blatant lies, inconsistencies add up to a much bigger pile of than all the hard evidence.
It was hilarious how a defense actor straddled the dummy, lifted its head and shoulders 2 feet off the ground and slammed it down repeatedly, as if Z were perfectly passive, armless, unresisting as that dummy while TM was beating the out of him.
Dummys usually don't fight back.
The coward had a good legal team thanks to a certain group of people providing financial support.
Okay......
tlong was complaining about a lynch mob, not me. I don't care about storm front.
I'm hoping for a hung jury and new trial with the state upgrading to serious prosecutorial talent rather than these local yokels. But it's a Repug FL that doesn't GAF about a young, black male in a hoodie.
LMAO
These weren't the locals...this was the special hit team brought in by the special prosecutor.
They simply couldn't overcome the obstacle of not having any evidence of 2nd degree murder.
This has to sting for a black man. You see so many public defenders who either don't know what the they are doing or are just going through the motions. They'd find a way to let a slow roller like this case nevertheless dribble between their legs.
To the former it turns out that law degree diploma from Southern is worth its weight in toilet paper, and to the latter at the end of the day what difference does it make to them if another poor black man goes to prison? Was he ever going to amount to anything anyway?
You don't have to play dumb; I already know you're dumb.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions