Reply With Quote
dang i guess you weren't lying about me being the only reason you follow this case, awwwww
deliberations usually take days, so hopefully you'll be able to catch my reaction after you done picking them grapes.
Umm no I don't claim to be dispassionate. Again quite the contrary. You know that I have admitted on many occassions to be an asshole and in this very thread, I said that I probably needed to explain myself dispassionately.
Darrin, its lack of critical thinking skills like this that make me think you are not very smart. Specific examples. You should try it.
dang i guess you weren't lying about me being the only reason you follow this case, awwwww
deliberations usually take days, so hopefully you'll be able to catch my reaction after you done picking them grapes.
People will be trolling you for months over your post, so might as well get used to it.
I don't think this one will take days. I expect to have a good buzz on and be soaking in the pool and watching it on the outside big screen tonight when they read the verdict.dang i guess you weren't lying about me being the only reason you follow this case, awwwww
deliberations usually take days, so hopefully you'll be able to catch my reaction after you done picking them grapes.
Great, CC is turning a thread into his own ranch blog again.
Jury just said they will continue deliberations tomorrow at 9am.
dude asked about the grapes. I showed him.
haters gotta hate.
Nah dude. They've already finished for the day.
hmmmm. OK. interesting.
They probably thought it would be bad form to waltz right back in with a not guilty verdict. They have probably been back there playing sudoku and candy crunch trying to make it look like it was a hard decision.
the jury just ended for the night and will pick back up tomorrow at 9am. so we'll be able to link back up here in the manana.
"The man who does not do his own thinking is a slave, and is a traitor to himself and to his fellow-men." -George Ingersoll
lol at your denial. Please don't get hooked on drugs because you will forever deny you are addicted. I just saved your life with that piece of advice.
There's a divide within the jury.
The only problem is that according to testimony given he did get his head beat in. What it looks like to me is that he got popped in the nose fell down and hit his head.
I have seen a guy stomped so bad that it caused brain damage before we pulled the guys off of him. I have hurt myself worse slipping in the shower.
Quite possible. judging by you and your buddies there are always a few wads around that are incapable of logical thought. maybe one got on the jury. Worst case a hung jury and no retrial.
You're an inarticulate ideologist. I can demonstrate this by once again pointing out your inability to articulate a supporting argument once again and the flippant comment about a Cadillac.
The relationship between socioeconomics and education is well established empirically. If you don't believe me then I will be more than happy to link a mul ude of scholarly works that outline how this is so. , they teach it in every economics class that has ever been.
Take note of the above. That is how to articulate what you mean and why you mean it. I would be more than happy to walk you through some exercises that would help you with this skill. You clearly lack it.
You're an inarticulate ideologist. I can demonstrate this by once again pointing out your inability to articulate a supporting argument once again and the flippant comment about a Cadillac.
The relationship between socioeconomics and education is well established empirically. If you don't believe me then I will be more than happy to link a mul ude of scholarly works that outline how this is so. , they teach it in every economics class that has ever been.
Take note of the above. That is how to articulate what you mean and why you mean it. I would be more than happy to walk you through some exercises that would help you with this skill. You clearly lack it.
You're an inarticulate ideologist. I can demonstrate this by once again pointing out your inability to articulate a supporting argument once again and the flippant comment about a Cadillac.
The relationship between socioeconomics and education is well established empirically. If you don't believe me then I will be more than happy to link a mul ude of scholarly works that outline how this is so. , they teach it in every economics class that has ever been.
Take note of the above. That is how to articulate what you mean and why you mean it. I would be more than happy to walk you through some exercises that would help you with this skill. You clearly lack it.
You're an inarticulate ideologist. I can demonstrate this by once again pointing out your inability to articulate a supporting argument once again and the flippant comment about a Cadillac.
The relationship between socioeconomics and education is well established empirically. If you don't believe me then I will be more than happy to link a mul ude of scholarly works that outline how this is so. , they teach it in every economics class that has ever been.
Take note of the above. That is how to articulate what you mean and why you mean it. I would be more than happy to walk you through some exercises that would help you with this skill. You clearly lack it.
You're an inarticulate ideologist. I can demonstrate this by once again pointing out your inability to articulate a supporting argument once again and the flippant comment about a Cadillac.
The relationship between socioeconomics and education is well established empirically. If you don't believe me then I will be more than happy to link a mul ude of scholarly works that outline how this is so. , they teach it in every economics class that has ever been.
Take note of the above. That is how to articulate what you mean and why you mean it. I would be more than happy to walk you through some exercises that would help you with this skill. You clearly lack it.
You're an inarticulate ideologist. I can demonstrate this by once again pointing out your inability to articulate a supporting argument once again and the flippant comment about a Cadillac.
The relationship between socioeconomics and education is well established empirically. If you don't believe me then I will be more than happy to link a mul ude of scholarly works that outline how this is so. , they teach it in every economics class that has ever been.
Take note of the above. That is how to articulate what you mean and why you mean it. I would be more than happy to walk you through some exercises that would help you with this skill. You clearly lack it.
You're an inarticulate ideologist. I can demonstrate this by once again pointing out your inability to articulate a supporting argument once again and the flippant comment about a Cadillac.
The relationship between socioeconomics and education is well established empirically. If you don't believe me then I will be more than happy to link a mul ude of scholarly works that outline how this is so. , they teach it in every economics class that has ever been.
Take note of the above. That is how to articulate what you mean and why you mean it. I would be more than happy to walk you through some exercises that would help you with this skill. You clearly lack it.
You're an inarticulate ideologist. I can demonstrate this by once again pointing out your inability to articulate a supporting argument once again and the flippant comment about a Cadillac.
The relationship between socioeconomics and education is well established empirically. If you don't believe me then I will be more than happy to link a mul ude of scholarly works that outline how this is so. , they teach it in every economics class that has ever been.
Take note of the above. That is how to articulate what you mean and why you mean it. I would be more than happy to walk you through some exercises that would help you with this skill. You clearly lack it.
You're an inarticulate ideologist. I can demonstrate this by once again pointing out your inability to articulate a supporting argument once again and the flippant comment about a Cadillac.
The relationship between socioeconomics and education is well established empirically. If you don't believe me then I will be more than happy to link a mul ude of scholarly works that outline how this is so. , they teach it in every economics class that has ever been.
Take note of the above. That is how to articulate what you mean and why you mean it. I would be more than happy to walk you through some exercises that would help you with this skill. You clearly lack it.
You're an inarticulate ideologist. I can demonstrate this by once again pointing out your inability to articulate a supporting argument once again and the flippant comment about a Cadillac.
The relationship between socioeconomics and education is well established empirically. If you don't believe me then I will be more than happy to link a mul ude of scholarly works that outline how this is so. , they teach it in every economics class that has ever been.
Take note of the above. That is how to articulate what you mean and why you mean it. I would be more than happy to walk you through some exercises that would help you with this skill. You clearly lack it.
You're an inarticulate ideologist. I can demonstrate this by once again pointing out your inability to articulate a supporting argument once again and the flippant comment about a Cadillac.
The relationship between socioeconomics and education is well established empirically. If you don't believe me then I will be more than happy to link a mul ude of scholarly works that outline how this is so. , they teach it in every economics class that has ever been.
Take note of the above. That is how to articulate what you mean and why you mean it. I would be more than happy to walk you through some exercises that would help you with this skill. You clearly lack it.
You're an inarticulate ideologist. I can demonstrate this by once again pointing out your inability to articulate a supporting argument once again and the flippant comment about a Cadillac.
The relationship between socioeconomics and education is well established empirically. If you don't believe me then I will be more than happy to link a mul ude of scholarly works that outline how this is so. , they teach it in every economics class that has ever been.
Take note of the above. That is how to articulate what you mean and why you mean it. I would be more than happy to walk you through some exercises that would help you with this skill. You clearly lack it.
You're an inarticulate ideologist. I can demonstrate this by once again pointing out your inability to articulate a supporting argument once again and the flippant comment about a Cadillac.
The relationship between socioeconomics and education is well established empirically. If you don't believe me then I will be more than happy to link a mul ude of scholarly works that outline how this is so. , they teach it in every economics class that has ever been.
Take note of the above. That is how to articulate what you mean and why you mean it. I would be more than happy to walk you through some exercises that would help you with this skill. You clearly lack it.
You're an inarticulate ideologist. I can demonstrate this by once again pointing out your inability to articulate a supporting argument once again and the flippant comment about a Cadillac.
The relationship between socioeconomics and education is well established empirically. If you don't believe me then I will be more than happy to link a mul ude of scholarly works that outline how this is so. , they teach it in every economics class that has ever been.
Take note of the above. That is how to articulate what you mean and why you mean it. I would be more than happy to walk you through some exercises that would help you with this skill. You clearly lack it.
You're an inarticulate ideologist. I can demonstrate this by once again pointing out your inability to articulate a supporting argument once again and the flippant comment about a Cadillac.
The relationship between socioeconomics and education is well established empirically. If you don't believe me then I will be more than happy to link a mul ude of scholarly works that outline how this is so. , they teach it in every economics class that has ever been.
Take note of the above. That is how to articulate what you mean and why you mean it. I would be more than happy to walk you through some exercises that would help you with this skill. You clearly lack it.
You're an inarticulate ideologist. I can demonstrate this by once again pointing out your inability to articulate a supporting argument once again and the flippant comment about a Cadillac.
The relationship between socioeconomics and education is well established empirically. If you don't believe me then I will be more than happy to link a mul ude of scholarly works that outline how this is so. , they teach it in every economics class that has ever been.
Take note of the above. That is how to articulate what you mean and why you mean it. I would be more than happy to walk you through some exercises that would help you with this skill. You clearly lack it.
You're an inarticulate ideologist. I can demonstrate this by once again pointing out your inability to articulate a supporting argument once again and the flippant comment about a Cadillac.
The relationship between socioeconomics and education is well established empirically. If you don't believe me then I will be more than happy to link a mul ude of scholarly works that outline how this is so. , they teach it in every economics class that has ever been.
Take note of the above. That is how to articulate what you mean and why you mean it. I would be more than happy to walk you through some exercises that would help you with this skill. You clearly lack it.
You're an inarticulate ideologist. I can demonstrate this by once again pointing out your inability to articulate a supporting argument once again and the flippant comment about a Cadillac.
The relationship between socioeconomics and education is well established empirically. If you don't believe me then I will be more than happy to link a mul ude of scholarly works that outline how this is so. , they teach it in every economics class that has ever been.
Take note of the above. That is how to articulate what you mean and why you mean it. I would be more than happy to walk you through some exercises that would help you with this skill. You clearly lack it.
You're an inarticulate ideologist. I can demonstrate this by once again pointing out your inability to articulate a supporting argument once again and the flippant comment about a Cadillac.
The relationship between socioeconomics and education is well established empirically. If you don't believe me then I will be more than happy to link a mul ude of scholarly works that outline how this is so. , they teach it in every economics class that has ever been.
Take note of the above. That is how to articulate what you mean and why you mean it. I would be more than happy to walk you through some exercises that would help you with this skill. You clearly lack it.
You're an inarticulate ideologist. I can demonstrate this by once again pointing out your inability to articulate a supporting argument once again and the flippant comment about a Cadillac.
The relationship between socioeconomics and education is well established empirically. If you don't believe me then I will be more than happy to link a mul ude of scholarly works that outline how this is so. , they teach it in every economics class that has ever been.
Take note of the above. That is how to articulate what you mean and why you mean it. I would be more than happy to walk you through some exercises that would help you with this skill. You clearly lack it.
You're an inarticulate ideologist. I can demonstrate this by once again pointing out your inability to articulate a supporting argument once again and the flippant comment about a Cadillac.
The relationship between socioeconomics and education is well established empirically. If you don't believe me then I will be more than happy to link a mul ude of scholarly works that outline how this is so. , they teach it in every economics class that has ever been.
Take note of the above. That is how to articulate what you mean and why you mean it. I would be more than happy to walk you through some exercises that would help you with this skill. You clearly lack it.
You're an inarticulate ideologist. I can demonstrate this by once again pointing out your inability to articulate a supporting argument once again and the flippant comment about a Cadillac.
The relationship between socioeconomics and education is well established empirically. If you don't believe me then I will be more than happy to link a mul ude of scholarly works that outline how this is so. , they teach it in every economics class that has ever been.
Take note of the above. That is how to articulate what you mean and why you mean it. I would be more than happy to walk you through some exercises that would help you with this skill. You clearly lack it.
You're an inarticulate ideologist. I can demonstrate this by once again pointing out your inability to articulate a supporting argument once again and the flippant comment about a Cadillac.
The relationship between socioeconomics and education is well established empirically. If you don't believe me then I will be more than happy to link a mul ude of scholarly works that outline how this is so. , they teach it in every economics class that has ever been.
Take note of the above. That is how to articulate what you mean and why you mean it. I would be more than happy to walk you through some exercises that would help you with this skill. You clearly lack it.
You're an inarticulate ideologist. I can demonstrate this by once again pointing out your inability to articulate a supporting argument once again and the flippant comment about a Cadillac.
The relationship between socioeconomics and education is well established empirically. If you don't believe me then I will be more than happy to link a mul ude of scholarly works that outline how this is so. , they teach it in every economics class that has ever been.
Take note of the above. That is how to articulate what you mean and why you mean it. I would be more than happy to walk you through some exercises that would help you with this skill. You clearly lack it.
You're an inarticulate ideologist. I can demonstrate this by once again pointing out your inability to articulate a supporting argument once again and the flippant comment about a Cadillac.
The relationship between socioeconomics and education is well established empirically. If you don't believe me then I will be more than happy to link a mul ude of scholarly works that outline how this is so. , they teach it in every economics class that has ever been.
Take note of the above. That is how to articulate what you mean and why you mean it. I would be more than happy to walk you through some exercises that would help you with this skill. You clearly lack it.
You're an inarticulate ideologist. I can demonstrate this by once again pointing out your inability to articulate a supporting argument once again and the flippant comment about a Cadillac.
The relationship between socioeconomics and education is well established empirically. If you don't believe me then I will be more than happy to link a mul ude of scholarly works that outline how this is so. , they teach it in every economics class that has ever been.
Take note of the above. That is how to articulate what you mean and why you mean it. I would be more than happy to walk you through some exercises that would help you with this skill. You clearly lack it.
You're an inarticulate ideologist. I can demonstrate this by once again pointing out your inability to articulate a supporting argument once again and the flippant comment about a Cadillac.
The relationship between socioeconomics and education is well established empirically. If you don't believe me then I will be more than happy to link a mul ude of scholarly works that outline how this is so. , they teach it in every economics class that has ever been.
Take note of the above. That is how to articulate what you mean and why you mean it. I would be more than happy to walk you through some exercises that would help you with this skill. You clearly lack it.
Oh noes!!!!
No it is not.
You are a narcissistic blowhard.
Godel was convinced he was going to be poisoned and a theist. He starved himself. Smart man? Because he thinks deeply about basic logic?
I don't think so. So because you are interested in math this precludes you from preconceived notions and neurotic behavior?
Sure thing.
Basic idea remains the same for incompleteness. Different fundamental logic for different problems. Not very satisfying. But what is...
i thought you were going to the ranch, fam? bring me a bottle of cabernet when we meet up at scott's place.
Where am I being bombastic? I don't see it. Condescending and pedantic no doubt but it just comes across to me that you are asshurt and trying to ape me. I get a lot of it to the point youre cliche even in this thread by itself. Try harder.
That Godel was paranoid is not mutually exclusive to his takes on set theory. Its like me saying the sky is blue and then you going no the ocean is blue! Baseless psychobabble doesn't change that. Whatever.
As for the differences in fundamental logic I think you are mistaking the path to a conclusion with the fundaments of logic. Most of the issue I see there is just linguistic and not insurmountable. Really though you are just dissembling for the topic like many others here are.
Who is trolling who at that point. At least you guys try.
When CC starts trying to compare penis size on the basis of money like this you know you are winning.
Ape you...
It's not linguistic. It's fundamental symbolism that are not mere words.
Anyhows, when this incident first came to the forefront you already had it pegged. Now you just skirt the facts that don't suit you and dig hard for those facts that fit. Typical of some lowly party hack.
I don't know why you are reposting valid arguments.
Zimmerman said that he would try and get back up and Martin would slam his head back down. He said that this went on for awhile. The ME said that his wounds were not consistent with that.
Do you think his account is truthful?
Words are symbols. If you are claiming that you have induced some truth outside of perception that you cannot make a word for then I laugh at you. I have a word for it: bull .
And now you are making claims as to what I thought on this subject from the beginning or what evidence I have looked at etc. I mean if you had said something and I just ignored it then that would be one thing. This tact you are taking just tells me you are mad and lashing out at me. Your tears are delicious. Really if you are upset then may I suggest you look for more productive outlets?
As I pointed out before I was wrong on the issue of presumption once a basis for self defense was established. That does not fit my narrative from before but I was wrong. In the face of that your whining just doesn't hold up.
At lest you stopped with the psychobabble.
You sure you want to drink the same grapes he has been stomping on with his athlete's feet and corn nuts? You might get a toe nail in your throat.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
