Reply With Quote
Holy .
I thought he abandoned that thread out of embarrassment.
Still holding on to that delusion despite being shown the definition of a majority owner and being provided information that Holt doesn't own 50% of the team.
Where's the proof that Holt owns 50%? Still waiting.
LMAO. You really are this stupid arent you? It actually doesnt matter if Holt owns 50%...he can own 40%....35%...and still be majority owner. Please tell me who is a bigger majority owner of the Spurs than Peter.......if you cant do it...you are a joke.
Holy .
I thought he abandoned that thread out of embarrassment.
I thought you would leave out of embarrashment of being a Manu homer...but here you are and here I am.
Yeah, but you're still completely wrong.
And you still believe OJ Simpson is innocent.
Straw men cannot save you.
You'd be much better off letting this argument die. The longer it continues, the worse you look. By definition, one cannot be a "majority owner" if they own 40%...35%... or anything other than one more than 50%. Just because somebody owns more shares than any other single individual doesn't make him the majority owner - that's not how it works.
You like men?
You are without a doubt the biggest moron to sign on in this forum this year. Congrats.
You fail 100%. Economics 101. Man...is everyone stupid here? If I own 40% of a bar...and all the other partners scatter out for the other 60%...I AM THE MAJORITY OWNER. LMAO!!!!
You looking for a date?
Were I into men, they would have to be smarter than you.
That's a plurality owner.
You still can't read. Absolute genius.
I have never seen anyone not grasp ownership control like this. If you owner 40%...35%...of a company...and no one owns more percentage than you...you are the majority owner. How hard is that to understand? Majority owner means the guy who owns they most percentage...LMAO. It doesnt matter what the other percentages add up to...you own the biggest percentage. Period. Man...this is comical.
I'm really not sure if you are serious or I'm getting punk'd here.
I'm trying to be civil here and answer respectfully. Could you be confusing "majority ownership" with "majority interest"?
Economics fail. Utter fail.
You can own the most shares without owning a majority (50% +1). That makes you the plurality owner.
Majority owner means you own 50% + 1 of shares and can push through whatever decisons you wish.
Plurality owner means you need other shares to vote with you to reach the 50% + 1.
Does Holt have other voting partners? Maybe. Probably.
Does that make him Majority Owner? No.
Please, keep arguing that Holt owning less than 50% of the Spurs makes him the majority owner. We're all laughing at the logic knots you twist yourself into.
Majority owner
Definition
A majority owner of a business is a person who controls more than half interest of the organization's outstanding shares, or, occasionally, a group of associated individuals who collectively control more than half interest of an organization's outstanding shares.
- See more at: http://www.investordictionary.com/de....3DNQD1vh.dpuf
Already did that in another thread. The idiot just won't accept he ed up his definitions.
If you don't have more than 50% then you are not the majority owner.
I literally told him that on the second page of his thread. Just because I knew he was going to make that mistake.
After suffering through dumbasses like Chris Ford, Jim Todd, Mike Dunleavy, and Vinny Del Negro, I get a kick out of Spurfan ripping Pop to shreds and calling him overrated.... some people don't know how good they have it with Pop, apparently...
I thought Pop did a good job throughout the regular season and majority of the playoffs, especially when you factor the injuries and age of the team. So I definetly give credit. But the Finals, particularly game 6, was brutal. He looked lost out there, maybe in need of a drink, perhaps helpless with Manu's tiness. Those 2 blew this Finals the most, to the point you hope they can recover from ting their pants. Hopefully they realize it.
Doc Rivers is overrated as well tbh.
Anyway Spurs fans know Pop's limitations better than anyone else but even some outsiders were shocked by how inept he was in the Finals, Bill Simmons among others called him out on it. Pop has an aura that he mostly has thanks to Tim Duncan and people in the media were mostly afraid to call him out on his mistakes but after his historical fail it's starting to change thankfully.
Pop isn't a hack like those guys, he definetly deserves some respect and appreciation. But he's also let his ego and stubbornness get the best of him and the team. Just hope there are people there to tell him about his ups, because he acts like a tenured professor at times, perhaps past his prime.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions