Reply With Quote
All that matters is that the child isn't brought up by insecure, weak-minded bigots like Avante.
Obviously a child needs loving parents, ya reckon? But to deprive a child of a normal family setting is wrong.
All that matters is that the child isn't brought up by insecure, weak-minded bigots like Avante.
Not at all, simply going with the realities of the situation. Why not give a child a normal life if possible.
lol @ normal.
I did.
And teh gheys do.
"People want to know: How will boys learn to become men? Where will they find their role models? Will they grow up to be gay?
Here's the truth: "Boyness" is inherent. It doesn't have to be instilled, or taught. The boys I encountered in my work devised boyhoods using not just social cues, but what seemed like innate male-iden y-building talents. They rode skateboards, they turned sticks into swords, toast into guns, they were leaders on sports teams. No one taught them to do these things. They just had it in them. And, in fact, all the research has reported children of gay parents feel less bound, less restricted, by gender stereotypes than those raised in straight households. They were freer to pursue a wide range of interests. There were no "boy things," no "girl things." Just kid things. That's key."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peggy-...b_1539166.html
But how will they learn about gay wrestling?
This study actually s on your premise.
I am convinced you are an idiot.
paste
Controversial study suggests having gay parents could have downside, but social scientists cry foul.
By: Stephanie Pappas, LiveScience Senior Writer
Published: 06/11/2012 04:59 PM EDT on LiveScience
A new study claiming to find disadvantages for children raised by same-sex parents is attracting criticism from social scientists, who say that the research does not actually address how well gay and lesbians parent.
The research surveyed almost 3,000 18- to 39-year-olds. Most were raised by heterosexual parents, but 175 had mothers who at one point had same-sex relationships and another 73 of whom had dads once in same-sex relationships. The results suggested that children of these parents are more likely than kids in other family structures to be on public assistance, unemployed or in therapy as adults, among other negative outcomes.
Finding was part of large-scale analysis of research about the power of parental rejection
Hey, dummy.
Post a link.
Lesbian parents know how to post links.
If you're going to post a cite, at least post the whole thing or a link to it. Otherwise, cherry picked garbage.paste
By: Stephanie Pappas, LiveScience Senior Writer
Published: 06/11/2012 04:59 PM EDT on LiveScience
A new study claiming to find disadvantages for children raised by same-sex parents is attracting criticism from social scientists, who say that the research does not actually address how well gay and lesbians parent.
The research surveyed almost 3,000 18- to 39-year-olds. Most were raised by heterosexual parents, but 175 had mothers who at one point had same-sex relationships and another 73 of whom had dads once in same-sex relationships. The results suggested that children of these parents are more likely than kids in other family structures to be on public assistance, unemployed or in therapy as adults, among other negative outcomes.
a vagina doesn't make a mom and a pair of testes and a shaft doesn't make a dad.
What was actually talked about if you'd paid attention was the imporatance of a father in the home, how could you have missed that?Finding was part of large-scale analysis of research about the power of parental rejection
Are you really going to read pages?
Ok
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_3186191.html
It actually said a father in the home can be quite detrimental if he's an asshole.
Have a real man read it to you.
"And remember that the way a father affirms his son depends on things like his culture and community and his son’s temperament and interests. The objective of affirmation is to meet a son at his particular point of need and to connect with him -- heart to heart. Indeed, there is no cookie-cutter approach to affirmation. "
"But what all of these acts of affirmation, big and small, communicate to your son is that you are his advocate and that your love is abiding and unconditional."
Funny. That article is exhorting fathers to emphasize anything that wasn't on your list of fatherly attributes. Indeed, nowhere in the article is it even implied that the father is the only one who can provide the nuturing described. Try again.
That wasn't the paged you cited, dummy.
Why are you so dumb?
Did your father teach you to be dumb?
No, actually. That wasn't what was being discussed.
"Examining the cases of more than 10,000 sons and daughters revealed how a cold or distant father can damage a child’s life, sometimes for decades to come.
The review of 36 studies from around the world concluded that his love is at least as important to youngsters as that of their mothers."
Look Avante. You have a viewpoint and I can respect that. All I ask is that you respect others' as well.
And yeah, I read pages.
... but not the rasslin' kind of love.
You totally and completely missed the point...wow!
Here ya go...
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/fischer/080707
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions